IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v130y2017icp17-24.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on constructing clear compromise plans

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Qi
  • Guo, Bing

Abstract

The regular two-level fractional factorial designs of n factors and N runs, having resolution IV and allowing experimenters to clearly estimate all main effects and a set of required two-factor interactions (2fi’s), are called clear compromise plans. Four classes of clear compromise plans have been discussed in the literature. The general minimum lower order confounding (GMC) is an elaborate criterion, which was proposed to select optimal fractional factorial designs. This paper gives a theory on constructing a set of class three clear compromise plans with 5N∕32+3≤n≤N∕4+1, called partially general minimum lower order confounding (P-GMC) designs. We first prove that each P-GMC design is constructed by a GMC design and two specified columns. Then we study the properties of these designs. For N=32,64 and 128, we illustrate that the P-GMC designs are admissible designs. Furthermore, they all have GMC, except for the P-GMC 213−7 and 223−16 designs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Qi & Guo, Bing, 2017. "A note on constructing clear compromise plans," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 17-24.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:130:y:2017:i:c:p:17-24
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2017.06.029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016771521730233X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2017.06.029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eric D. Schoen & Robert W. Mee, 2012. "Two‐level designs of strength 3 and up to 48 runs," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 61(1), pages 163-174, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. SCHOEN, Eric D. & VO-THANH, Nha & GOOS, Peter, 2015. "Two-level orthogonal designs in 24 and 28 runs," Working Papers 2015016, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    2. Nha Vo-Thanh & Peter Goos & Eric D. Schoen, 2020. "Integer programming approaches to find row–column arrangements of two-level orthogonal experimental designs," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 52(7), pages 780-796, July.
    3. Eendebak, Pieter T. & Schoen, Eric D. & Vazquez, Alan R. & Goos, Peter, 2023. "Systematic enumeration of two-level even-odd designs of strength 3," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    4. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & SCHOEN, Eric D. & GOOS, Peter, 2018. "A mixed integer optimization approach for model selection in screening experiments," Working Papers 2018007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    5. SARTONO, Bagus & GOOS, Peter & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2012. "Orthogonal blocking of regular and non-regular strength-3 designs," Working Papers 2012026, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    6. VÁZQUEZ-ALCOCER, Alan & GOOS, Peter & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2016. "Two-level designs constructed by concatenating orthogonal arrays of strenght three," Working Papers 2016011, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.
    7. EENDEBAK, Pieter T. & SCHOEN, Eric D., 2015. "Two-level designs to estimate all main effects and two-factor interactions," Working Papers 2015019, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:130:y:2017:i:c:p:17-24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.