IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/amj/wpaper/a-fen_23005.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The decision making of commercial pilots seen from ethics

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Bernardo Carmona Benitez

    (Universidad Anahuac Mexico (Mexico))

  • Luis Felipe Llanos

    (Universidad Anahuac Mexico (Mexico))

Abstract

The reference framework for decision-making from an ethical point of view has not been studied in depth in the commercial pilot industry (CPL). To do so, a survey with six scenarios is designed with the advice of the Mexican Pilots Union. The results indicate that CPLs do not apply the same ethical decision-making framework, 50% apply deontological rules, and the other 50% teleological theory rules, regardless of gender, age, experience, or crew position. Among the ethical approaches, most of the CPLs apply the personal moral approach, which is part of a deontological theory, as an ethical decision-making framework. The implication of the results is the recommendation that CPL training programs should promote ethics discussion groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Bernardo Carmona Benitez & Luis Felipe Llanos, 2023. "The decision making of commercial pilots seen from ethics," Papers 23005, Working Papers of Business and Economics School. Anahuac University (Mexico)..
    • Handle: RePEc:amj:wpaper:a-fen_23005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://revistas.anahuac.mx/public/REPEC/amj/wpaper/2023/Working_paper-The_decision_making_of_commercial_pilots_seen_from_ethics_23005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:eme:mrn000:01409170911006894 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. John Sparks & Yue Pan, 2010. "Ethical Judgments in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(3), pages 405-418, February.
    3. Zhenzhong Ma, 2009. "The Status of Contemporary Business Ethics Research: Present and Future," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 255-265, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Margarida Avillez & Andrew Greenman & Susan Marlow, 2020. "Ethical Judgments About Social Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Influence of Spatio-Cultural Meanings," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 161(4), pages 877-892, February.
    2. Christian Julmi, 2024. "Analysis and Intuition Effectiveness in Moral Problems," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 191(1), pages 179-193, April.
    3. Qian, Lixian & Yin, Juelin & Huang, Youlin & Liang, Ya, 2023. "The role of values and ethics in influencing consumers’ intention to use autonomous vehicle hailing services," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    4. Rasim Serdar Kurdoglu & Nüfer Yasin Ateş, 2022. "Arguing to Defeat: Eristic Argumentation and Irrationality in Resolving Moral Concerns," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 519-535, January.
    5. Zhenzhong Ma & Maoliang Bu, 2021. "A New Research Horizon for Mass Entrepreneurship Policy and Chinese Firms’ CSR: Introduction to the Thematic Symposium," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(4), pages 603-607, April.
    6. Shu-Yun Du & Xiao-Chen Shao & Alfredo Jiménez & Jeoung Yul Lee, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility of Chinese Multinational Enterprises: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. de Kerviler, Gwarlann & Ardelet, Caroline & Slavich, Barbara, 2022. "Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 899-913.
    8. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Ethical Judgments: What Do We Know, Where Do We Go?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 115(3), pages 575-597, July.
    9. Jie Chen & Lefa Teng & Yonghai Liao, 2018. "Counterfeit Luxuries: Does Moral Reasoning Strategy Influence Consumers’ Pursuit of Counterfeits?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(1), pages 249-264, August.
    10. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Ghislaine Garmilis, 2016. "Accounting Professionals’ Ethical Judgment and the Institutional Disciplinary Context: A French–US Comparison," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(4), pages 639-659, December.
    11. Valor, Carmen & Antonetti, Paolo & Zasuwa, Grzegorz, 2022. "Corporate social irresponsibility and consumer punishment: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1218-1233.
    12. Christopher Robertson & Dane Blevins & Tom Duffy, 2013. "A Five-Year Review, Update, and Assessment of Ethics and Governance in Strategic Management Journal," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(1), pages 85-91, September.
    13. Loréa Baïada-Hirèche & Jean Pasquero & Jean-François Chanlat, 2011. "Managerial Responsibility as Negotiated Order: A Social Construction Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 101(1), pages 17-31, March.
    14. Hanne Knight & Phil Megicks & Sheela Agarwal & M.A.A.M. Leenders, 2019. "Firm resources and the development of environmental sustainability among small and medium‐sized enterprises: Evidence from the Australian wine industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(1), pages 25-39, January.
    15. Gwarlann de Kerviler & Caroline Ardelet & Barbara Slavich, 2022. "Ethical judgments of sexualized ads featuring Women: The role of identification with feminine archetypes," Post-Print hal-03600339, HAL.
    16. Brian Baldassarre & Giulia Calabretta & Ingo Oswald Karpen & Nancy Bocken & Erik Jan Hultink, 2024. "Responsible Design Thinking for Sustainable Development: Critical Literature Review, New Conceptual Framework, and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 25-46, November.
    17. Zhenzhong Ma, 2010. "The SINS in Business Negotiations: Explore the Cross-Cultural Differences in Business Ethics Between Canada and China," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 123-135, February.
    18. Nicholas McClaren, 2015. "The Methodology in Empirical Sales Ethics Research: 1980–2010," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(1), pages 121-147, March.
    19. Benjamin Boeuf & Jessica Darveau, 2019. "An Ethical Perspective on Necro-Advertising: The Moderating Effect of Brand Equity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(4), pages 1077-1099, April.
    20. Peter Mudrack & E. Mason, 2013. "Dilemmas, Conspiracies, and Sophie’s Choice: Vignette Themes and Ethical Judgments," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 118(3), pages 639-653, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:amj:wpaper:a-fen_23005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Agustin Moya (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.