IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersmp/329880.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Use of Land Reserves to Control Agricultural Production

Author

Listed:
  • Ericksen, Milton

Abstract

A land reserve program is one instrument for achieving pro- duction adjustment. But the results of past programs have been less than expected because of "slippage." This term refers to the proportion of acreage put into a reserve for which there is no corresponding reduction in production of the crops being controlled. Slippage coefficients in land reserve programs during 1956-73 usually ranged between 0.4 and 0.5, implying a program efficiency rate of only 50-60 percent in reducing acreage. Acreage put into land reserve also tends to be less productive than acreage being cropped, thus further reducing program production abatement. A land reserve program which would link base acreage to the previous year's crop acreage is discussed. Land reserve acres would be required to come from the land actually used for production of the controlled crop in the previous year. One problem of such a plan would be that income supplements tied to annually updated bases might be an incentive for producers not to participate in the program for a year to establish a large base. The probability of this response would be decreased if income supplements were variable annually.

Suggested Citation

  • Ericksen, Milton, 1976. "Use of Land Reserves to Control Agricultural Production," Miscellaneous Publications 329880, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:329880
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329880
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329880/files/ERS-635.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.329880?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Garst, Gail D. & Miller, Thomas A., 1975. "Impact of the Set-Aside Program on the U.S. Wheat Acreages," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 27(02), pages 1-8, April.
    2. Weisgerber, P., 1969. "Productivity of Diverted Cropland," Miscellaneous Publications 321941, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Frey, H. Thomas, 1973. "Major Uses of Land in the United States, Summary for 1969," Agricultural Economic Reports 305571, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. J. P. Houck & M. E. Ryan, 1972. "Supply Analysis for Corn in the United States: The Impact of Changing Government Programs," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 54(2), pages 184-191.
    5. Houck, James P. & Ryan, Mary E., 1972. "Supply Analysis For Corn In The United States: The Impact Of Changing Government Programs," Staff Papers 13554, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    6. Sharples, Jerry A. & Walker, Rodney L., 1974. "Shifts in Cropland Use in the North Central Region," Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, vol. 26(4), pages 1-6, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boggess, William Glenn, 1979. "Development and application of an interregional separable programming model of United States agriculture in 1985," ISU General Staff Papers 197901010800008192, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Love, H. Alan & Foster, William E., 1990. "Commodity Program Slippage Rates For Corn And Wheat," Western Journal of Agricultural Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 15(2), pages 1-10, December.
    3. Dvoskin, Dan, 1988. "Excess Capacity in U.S. Agriculture: An Economic Approach to Measurement," Agricultural Economic Reports 308036, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Langley, James A. & Price, J. Michael, 1985. "Implications of Alternative Moving Average Loan Rates," Agricultural Economic Reports 307994, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    5. Norton, Nancy Anders, 1986. "The Effect Of Acreage Reduction Programs On The Production Of Corn, Wheat, And Cotton: A Profit Function Approach," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278421, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    6. Teigen, Lloyd D., 1988. "Agricultural Policy, Technology Adoption, and Farm Structure," Staff Reports 278118, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Norton, Nancy Anders, 1986. "The Effect Of Acreage Reduction Programs On The Production Of Corn, Wheat, And Cotton: A Profit Function Approach," 1986 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Reno, Nevada 278421, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Brandow, George E., 1977. "Policy for Commercial Agriculture, 1945-71," A Survey of Agricultural Economics Literature, Volume 1: Traditional Fields of Agricultural Economics 1940s to 1970s,, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Brandow, G.E., 1977. "PART III. Policy for Commerical Agriculture, 1945-71," AAEA Monographs, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, number 337215.
    4. Langley, James A., 1983. "Regional acreage response functions for major US field crops: estimation and policy implications," ISU General Staff Papers 198301010800008678, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    5. Grant, Warren R. & Beach, John & Lin, William, 1984. "Factors Affecting Supply, Demand, And Prices Of U.S. Rice," Staff Reports 277629, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    6. Chembezi, Duncan M. & Womack, Abner W., 1992. "Regional Acreage Response For U.S. Corn And Wheat: The Effects Of Government Programs," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 24(01), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Haile, M.G. & Kalkuhl, M., 2014. "Volatility in the international food markets: implications for global agricultural supply and for market and price policy," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 49, March.
    8. Bailey, Kenneth W. & Womack, Abner W., 1985. "Wheat Acreage Response: A Regional Econometric Investigation," Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, December.
    9. Yinhao Wu & Enru Wang & Changhong Miao, 2019. "Fertilizer Use in China: The Role of Agricultural Support Policies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-23, August.
    10. Bakhshi, Samira & Kerr, William A., 2009. "Is There Supply Distortion In The Green Box? An Acreage Response Approach," Working Papers 51093, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    11. Araji, A.A. & White, Fred C. & Guenthner, Joseph F., 1995. "Spillovers And The Returns To Agricultural Research For Potatoes," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, December.
    12. Kanlaya J. Barr & Bruce A. Babcock & Miguel A. Carriquiry & Andre M. Nassar & Leila Harfuch, 2011. "Agricultural Land Elasticities in the United States and Brazil," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 33(3), pages 449-462.
    13. Kramer, Randall A. & Pope, Rulon D., 1980. "The Benefits And Costs Of Participation In Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis," Working Papers 225685, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    14. Weaver, Robert D., 1978. "Discontinuous Policy and Distorted Choices: the Case of Acreage Control," Staff Paper Series 291354, Pennsylvania State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    15. Demirdöğen, Alper & Olhan, Emine & Chavas, Jean-Paul, 2016. "Food vs. fiber: An analysis of agricultural support policy in Turkey," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 1-8.
    16. Howland, Frank M., 1990. "Alternative Empirical Measures Of The Supply Effect Of The Corn Price Support Program," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 271035, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Just, Richard E., 1992. "Discovering Microeconomic Relationships in Agriculture," 1992 Conference (36th), February 10-13, 1992, Canberra, Australia 146530, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Ubilava, David, 2008. "Analysis of the Soybean-to-Corn Price Ratio and its Impact on Farmers' Planting Decision-Making in Indiana," 2008 Annual Meeting, February 2-6, 2008, Dallas, Texas 6783, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    19. Umanath Malaiarasan & R. Paramasivam & K. Thomas Felix & S. J. Balaji, 2020. "Simultaneous equation model for Indian sugar sector," Journal of Social and Economic Development, Springer;Institute for Social and Economic Change, vol. 22(1), pages 113-141, June.
    20. Griffiths, William E. & Anderson, Jock R., 1978. "Specification Of Agricultural Supply Functions - Empirical Evidence On Wheat In Southern N.S.W," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 22(2-3), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersmp:329880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.