IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/uersib/302486.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Economic Viability of Industrial Hemp in the United States: A Review of State Pilot Programs

Author

Listed:
  • Mark, Tyler
  • Shepherd, Jonathan
  • Olson, David
  • Snell, William
  • Proper, Susan
  • Thornsbury, Suzanne

Abstract

After a hiatus of almost 45 years, the Agricultural Act of 2014, Public Law 113-79 (the 2014 Farm Bill) reintroduced industrial hemp production in the United States through State pilot programs. U.S. industrial hemp acreage reported by State pilot programs increased from 0 in 2013 to over 90,000 acres in 2018, the largest U.S. hemp acreage since the 146,200 acres grown in 1943. While the U.S. hemp industry grew rapidly and commercial hemp production was legalized again by the 2018 Farm Bill, the industry’s long-term economic viability is uncertain. This study documents outcomes and lessons learned from the State pilot programs and examines legal, agronomic, and economic challenges that may affect the transition from the pilot programs to economically viable commercial production. Competition with alternative crops for acreage, global competitiveness, market transparency, and the ability to manage regulatory and market risks will determine patterns of development in the emerging U.S. hemp industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark, Tyler & Shepherd, Jonathan & Olson, David & Snell, William & Proper, Susan & Thornsbury, Suzanne, 2020. "Economic Viability of Industrial Hemp in the United States: A Review of State Pilot Programs," Economic Information Bulletin 302486, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:302486
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.302486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/302486/files/eib-217.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.302486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Obed Quaicoe & Fafanyo Asiseh & Omoanghe S. Isikhuemhen, 2023. "Qualitative Analysis of Industrial Hemp Production, Markets, and Sustainability in North Carolina, United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    2. Martinez, Charley C. & Smith, S. Aaron & Mark, Tyler & Goeringer, Paul, 2022. "Challenges with Developing an Extension Program for Markets Evolving under an Uncertain Framework: Lessons from Program Development for Carbon and Hemp Markets," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(3), August.
    3. Waea, 2021. "Western Economics Forum: A Journal of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, v.19, Issue 2, Fall 2021," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    4. Mehrab Valizadehderakhshan & Abolghasem Shahbazi & Masoud Kazem-Rostami & Matthew Scott Todd & Arnab Bhowmik & Lijun Wang, 2021. "Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. (Hemp)—Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Ebert, Kerri & Hoch, Braden & Taylor, Hannah & Schwab, Benjamin, 2020. "From the Ground Up: A Look at Kansas’ First Year of Industrial Hemp Production," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), December.
    6. Jane Kolodinsky & Hannah Lacasse & Katherine Gallagher, 2020. "Making Hemp Choices: Evidence from Vermont," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    7. Haohan Zhao & Heping Xiong & Jikang Chen, 2021. "Regional Comparison and Strategy Recommendations of Industrial Hemp in China Based on a SWOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.
    8. Jeffrey S. Young & Tanner J. McCarty, 2023. "Adapting network theory for spatial network externalities in agriculture: A case study on hemp cross‐pollination," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1267-1287, August.
    9. Gurinder Kaur & Ronald Kander, 2023. "The Sustainability of Industrial Hemp: A Literature Review of Its Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Dhoubhadel, Sunil P., 2021. "Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward for the U.S. Hemp Industry," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    11. Staples, Aaron J. & Malone, Trey & McFadden, Brandon R., 2022. "CBD and THC: Who Buys It, and Why?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 53(3), November.
    12. GwanSeon Kim & Tyler Mark, 2023. "What factors make consumers in the USA buy hemp products? Evidence from Nielsen consumer panel data," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:uersib:302486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ersgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.