IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ags/aaeatr/323986.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Challenges with Developing an Extension Program for Markets Evolving under an Uncertain Framework: Lessons from Program Development for Carbon and Hemp Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Martinez, Charley C.
  • Smith, S. Aaron
  • Mark, Tyler
  • Goeringer, Paul

Abstract

Extension programs are the link between producers, applied research, and policy. Additionally, Extension educators are often the initial point of contact for producers when new agricultural markets emerge. Emerging markets provide opportunities and challenges for all producers. However, developing an Extension program to assist producers can be difficult due to limited production information (or process clarity), a lack of infrastructure, uncertain marketing channels, and uncertain policy direction. During the emergence of new commodities or markets, the development of Extension programming is necessary to aid producers and other agricultural stakeholders in clarifying the risks and rewards of entering or participating in the market. A further complication is a bimodal distribution of clientele ranging from those operators new to agriculture to established operators. The development of carbon and hemp markets in the United States highlights the difficulties in providing producers with timely information when a highly uncertain policy and regulatory environment exists. This paper discusses how to develop an Extension program to address producers’ needs for emerging markets effectively. Specifically, we highlight the benefits of collaboration, obtaining grant funding, program development, and identifying research topics. Finally, the program development discussed can be utilized by Extension educators when developing programming for future emerging markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Martinez, Charley C. & Smith, S. Aaron & Mark, Tyler & Goeringer, Paul, 2022. "Challenges with Developing an Extension Program for Markets Evolving under an Uncertain Framework: Lessons from Program Development for Carbon and Hemp Markets," Applied Economics Teaching Resources (AETR), Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 4(3), August.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:323986
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.323986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/323986/files/AETR_2022_014RRV4I3_v3.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.323986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mark, Tyler & Shepherd, Jonathan & Olson, David & Snell, William & Proper, Susan & Thornsbury, Suzanne, 2020. "Economic Viability of Industrial Hemp in the United States: A Review of State Pilot Programs," Economic Information Bulletin 302486, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mehrab Valizadehderakhshan & Abolghasem Shahbazi & Masoud Kazem-Rostami & Matthew Scott Todd & Arnab Bhowmik & Lijun Wang, 2021. "Extraction of Cannabinoids from Cannabis sativa L. (Hemp)—Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, April.
    2. GwanSeon Kim & Tyler Mark, 2023. "What factors make consumers in the USA buy hemp products? Evidence from Nielsen consumer panel data," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Ebert, Kerri & Hoch, Braden & Taylor, Hannah & Schwab, Benjamin, 2020. "From the Ground Up: A Look at Kansas’ First Year of Industrial Hemp Production," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(2), December.
    4. Staples, Aaron J. & Malone, Trey & McFadden, Brandon R., 2022. "CBD and THC: Who Buys It, and Why?," Journal of Food Distribution Research, Food Distribution Research Society, vol. 53(3), November.
    5. Jane Kolodinsky & Hannah Lacasse & Katherine Gallagher, 2020. "Making Hemp Choices: Evidence from Vermont," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Dhoubhadel, Sunil P., 2021. "Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward for the U.S. Hemp Industry," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    7. Jeffrey S. Young & Tanner J. McCarty, 2023. "Adapting network theory for spatial network externalities in agriculture: A case study on hemp cross‐pollination," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(4), pages 1267-1287, August.
    8. Waea, 2021. "Western Economics Forum: A Journal of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, v.19, Issue 2, Fall 2021," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 19(2), December.
    9. Gurinder Kaur & Ronald Kander, 2023. "The Sustainability of Industrial Hemp: A Literature Review of Its Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-15, April.
    10. Obed Quaicoe & Fafanyo Asiseh & Omoanghe S. Isikhuemhen, 2023. "Qualitative Analysis of Industrial Hemp Production, Markets, and Sustainability in North Carolina, United States," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Haohan Zhao & Heping Xiong & Jikang Chen, 2021. "Regional Comparison and Strategy Recommendations of Industrial Hemp in China Based on a SWOT Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeatr:323986. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.