IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/tamfip/42779.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Counter-Cyclical Farm Safety Nets

Author

Listed:
  • Richardson, James W.
  • Klose, Steven L.
  • Smith, Edward G.

Abstract

Since the 1920's, the federal government has used an array of farm programs to provide a “safety net” for American agriculture. Farm programs have used price supports, disaster payments, income supports, direct payments, and supply management to provide a safety net for particular markets and producers. This array of farm programs has rarely been organized or managed with the sole purpose of providing a minimum income level to farmers. With the exception of set aside programs, the programs have provided incentives for production and the diversification of production through out the continental United States. While the FAIR Act of 1996 has been generously applauded for allowing producers planting flexibility, maintaining export competitiveness through marketing loan programs, and maintaining production, the Act has been criticized for its lack of a sufficient safety net. All crop insurance programs and marketing loan provisions may be considered safety nets. However, the ad hoc passage of emergency relief in each of the last three years 1998-2000 suggests that these programs have not provided sufficient support to program crop agriculture. The safety net issue, therefore, will likely be a major source of debate in crafting the next farm bill. Can the U.S. government reduce the liquidity problem facing major crop agriculture while pressing the popular provisions of the FAIR Act? Developing a whole farm safety net proposal is one alternative being studied.

Suggested Citation

  • Richardson, James W. & Klose, Steven L. & Smith, Edward G., 2001. "Counter-Cyclical Farm Safety Nets," Policy Issues Papers 42779, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:tamfip:42779
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.42779
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/42779/files/ip01-1.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.42779?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Adams, Gary M. & Richardson, James W., 2001. "Exploring Options For A New Farm Bill," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 33(2), pages 1-10, August.
    2. repec:ags:joaaec:v:33:y:2001:i:2:p:261-270 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Gundersen, Craig & et al. [+9], 2000. "A Safety Net For Farm Households," Agricultural Economic Reports 308435, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. Chad E. Hart & Bruce A. Babcock, 2000. "Counter-Cyclical Agricultural Program Payments: Is It Time to Look at Revenue?," Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) Publications 99-bp28, Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CARD) at Iowa State University.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blandford, David & Boisvert, Richard N., 2004. "U.S. Policy for Agricultural Adjustment," IAPRAP\IATRC Summer Symposium, Adjusting to Domestic and International Agricultural Reform in Industrial Countries, June 6-7, 2004, Philadelphia, PA, 15771, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    2. Berkeley Hill, 2008. "Some Economics of Public Statistics," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(3), pages 387-420, September.
    3. Schumann, Keith D. & Feldman, Paul A. & Richardson, James W. & Smith, Edward G., 2001. "Comparison of Alternative Safety Net Programs for the 2000 Farm Bill," Working Papers 42781, Texas A&M University, Agricultural and Food Policy Center.
    4. Blandford, David & Boisvert, Richard N., 2002. "Non-Trade Concerns And Domestic/International Policy Choice," Working Papers 14615, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    5. Johnson, D. Demcey, 2002. "Issues And Trends In The U.S. Field Crop Sector," Proceedings of the 7th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2001: Structural Change as a Source of Trade Disputes Under NAFTA 16876, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    6. Unknown, 2002. "Cimmyt 2000-2001 World Wheat Overview And Outlook: Developing No-Till Packages For Small-Scale Farmers," Facts and Trends/Overview and Outlook 23725, CIMMYT: International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center.
    7. Richardson, James W. & Outlaw, Joe L., 2017. "Npr - The Role Of U. S. Safety Net Programs In Incentivizing Farm Growth: A Simulation Approach," 21st Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2-7, 2017 345821, International Farm Management Association.
    8. Boisvert, Richard N., 2002. "Analysis of a Re-Focused Agricultural Policy within a Farm-Household Framework Some Data Requirements," Workshop on the Farm Household-Firm Unit: Its Importance in Agriculture and Implications for Statistics, April 12-13,2002, Wye Campus, Imperial College 15727, International Agricultural Policy Reform and Adjustment Project (IAPRAP).
    9. Offutt, Susan E., 2001. "What Does Farm Structure Imply For Future Farm Policy?," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2001 33103, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    10. Dismukes, Robert & Arriola, Christine & Coble, Keith H., 2010. "ACRE Program Payments and Risk Reduction: An Analysis Based on Simulations of Crop Revenue Variability," Economic Research Report 262248, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Marjoleine Hennis, 2002. "New Transatlantic Conflicts: American and European Food Policies Compared," EUI-RSCAS Working Papers 1, European University Institute (EUI), Robert Schuman Centre of Advanced Studies (RSCAS).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:tamfip:42779. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aftamus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.