IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/saeana/46864.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effect of Corn Price on Profitability of Control Vs Phytase Enhanced Diet of Hogs

Author

Listed:
  • Atreya, Ajita
  • Vitale, Jeffrey D.
  • Stoecker, Arthur L.
  • Carter, Scott D.

Abstract

Economic Simulation model (SIMETAR) was used to investigate the effect of future corn price on profitability of control and phytase enhanced diet of hogs. The completed simulation model was used to estimate probability distribution for control vs lower excretion diet profitability under different corn prices. Data used was collected from recent field trials in Oklahoma that tested the effect of phytase enhanced diets on reducing phosphorus emission. The results showed that as the market price of corn increases control diet will be more profitable than phytase enhanced diet, given the cost of other remaining feed ingredient is constant for both the diets.

Suggested Citation

  • Atreya, Ajita & Vitale, Jeffrey D. & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Carter, Scott D., 2009. "Effect of Corn Price on Profitability of Control Vs Phytase Enhanced Diet of Hogs," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46864, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:saeana:46864
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.46864
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/46864/files/SAEA%20Paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.46864?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boland, Michael A. & Preckel, Paul V. & Foster, Kenneth A., 1998. "Economic Analysis Of Phosphorus - Reducing Technologies In Pork Production," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(2), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Yap, Crystal & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V. & Doering, Otto C., III & Richert, Brian T., 2004. "Mitigating the Compliance Cost of a Phosphorus-Based Swine Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(1), pages 1-12, April.
    3. Conrad Lyford & Todd Hicks, 2001. "The Environment and Pork Production: The Oklahoma Industry at a Crossroads," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 265-274.
    4. Boland, Michael A. & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V., 1999. "Nutrition and the Economics of Swine Management," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(1), pages 83-96, April.
    5. Hien, Victor & Kabore, Daniel & Youl, Sansan & Lowenberg-DeBoer, J., 1997. "Stochastic dominance analysis of on-farm-trial data: The riskiness of alternative phosphate sources in Burkina Faso," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 15(3), pages 213-221, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kaplan, Jonathan D., 2001. "Prevention Versus Utilization Of Excess Nutrients From Animal Feeding Operations:The Case Of Managing Nutrient Uncertainty," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20533, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    2. Fox, P. & Rockstrom, J. & Barron, J., 2005. "Risk analysis and economic viability of water harvesting for supplemental irrigation in semi-arid Burkina Faso and Kenya," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 83(3), pages 231-250, March.
    3. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Black, J. Roy & Harsh, Stephen B., 2008. "Incorporating Environmentally Compliant Manure Nutrient Disposal Costs into Least-Cost Livestock Ration Formulation," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 40(1), pages 1-14, April.
    4. Hadrich, Joleen C. & Wolf, Christopher A. & Harsh, Stephen B., 2005. "Optimal livestock diet formulation with farm environmental compliance consequences," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19427, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    5. Sanna Lötjönen & Esa Temmes & Markku Ollikainen, 2020. "Dairy Farm Management when Nutrient Runoff and Climate Emissions Count," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(3), pages 960-981, May.
    6. Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Langyintuo, Augustine S. & Dogbe, Wilson, 2006. "Economics of the impact of alternative rice cropping systems on subsistence farming: Whole-farm analysis in northern Ghana," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 91(1-2), pages 102-121, November.
    7. Janne Antero Helin, 2014. "Reducing nutrient loads from dairy farms: a bioeconomic model with endogenous feeding and land use," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 45(2), pages 167-184, March.
    8. Stacy Sneeringer & Nigel Key & Shirley Pon, 2018. "Do Nutrient Management Plans Actually Manage Nutrients? Evidence from a Nationally‐Representative Survey of Hog Producers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 632-652, December.
    9. Lambert, Dayton M. & Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 2001. "Optimal Row Width For Corn And Soybean," Staff Papers 28681, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    10. Yap, Crystal & Foster, Kenneth A. & Preckel, Paul V. & Doering, Otto C., III, 2001. "The Economic Impacts Of Phosphorus-Based Manure Management Policies On A Representative North Central Indiana Hog-Grain Farm," Staff Papers 28642, Purdue University, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    11. Kaufman, James & Kalaitzandonakes, Nicholas G., 2011. "Mitigating environmental externalities in livestock production through feed biotechnologies," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 104(9), pages 770-780.
    12. De Matteis, Maria C. & Yu, T. Edward & Boyer, Christopher N. & DeLong, Karen L. & Smith, Jason, 2018. "Economic and environmental implications of incorporating distillers’ dried grains with solubles in feed rations of growing and finishing swine in Argentina," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 21(6), July.
    13. Yap, Crystal & Foster, Ken & Preckel, Paul & Doering, Otto & Richert, Brian, 2004. "Mitigating the Compliance Cost of a Phosphorus-Based Swine Manure Management Policy," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 36(1), pages 23-34, April.
    14. Jefferson, Kenrett Y. & Traxler, Greg, 2002. "The Economics Of Value Enhanced Crops: An Analysis Of Benefit Sharing In The U.S," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19619, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    15. Adhikari, Murali & Paudel, Krishna P. & Martin, Neil R., Jr., 2002. "An Evaluation Of An Economic Strategy For Preventing Water Pollution Using A Phosphorus Consistent Transportation Model: A Case Of Broiler Litter Management," Agecon Series 31657, Louisiana State University, Department of Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness.
    16. Stonehouse, D. P. & de Vos, G. W. & Weersink, A., 2002. "Livestock manure systems for swine finishing enterprises," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 279-296, September.
    17. Jeffrey Ohlmann & Philip Jones, 2011. "An integer programming model for optimal pork marketing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 190(1), pages 271-287, October.
    18. Lowenberg-DeBoer, James, 1999. "Risk Management Potential Of Precision Farming Technologies," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Southern Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 31(2), pages 1-11, August.
    19. Leen, Frederik & Van den Broeke, Alice & Aluwé, Marijke & Lauwers, Ludwig & Millet, Sam & Van Meensel, Jef, 2018. "Stakeholder-driven modelling the impact of animal profile and market conditions on optimal delivery weight in growing-finishing pig production," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 34-45.
    20. Huang, Wen-Yuan & Magleby, Richard S. & Somwaru, Agapi, 2001. "The Economic Impacts Of Alternative Manure Management Regulations On Hog Farms In The Heartland: An Individual-Farm Analysis," 2001 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Chicago, IL 20676, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Production Economics;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:saeana:46864. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/saeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.