IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/revage/v23y2001i1p265-274..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Environment and Pork Production: The Oklahoma Industry at a Crossroads

Author

Listed:
  • Conrad Lyford
  • Todd Hicks

Abstract

Few current debates in agriculture are as contentious as those that surround pork production and the environment. Large amounts of pork production now take place on huge pork production megafarms, often located in nontraditional pork producing states. Initially environmental regulations of these facilities are usually not stringent, but these facilities are increasingly being regulated by costly and stringent legislative requirements. However, these facilities provide increased employment, incomes, and tax base for local communities. Common concerns are how these facilities should be regulated environmentally and appropriate industry responses. While this case study focuses on the Oklahoma pork industry, the general lessons of agricultural industrialization and environmental regulation have wide relevance.

Suggested Citation

  • Conrad Lyford & Todd Hicks, 2001. "The Environment and Pork Production: The Oklahoma Industry at a Crossroads," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 23(1), pages 265-274.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:23:y:2001:i:1:p:265-274.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1111/1058-7195.00059
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Stacy Sneeringer & Nigel Key & Shirley Pon, 2018. "Do Nutrient Management Plans Actually Manage Nutrients? Evidence from a Nationally‐Representative Survey of Hog Producers," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(4), pages 632-652, December.
    2. Sneeringer, Stacy & Pon, Shirley, 2016. "Do nutrient management plans actually manage nutrients? Evidence from a nationally-representative survey of hog producers," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235681, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    3. Atreya, Ajita & Vitale, Jeffrey D. & Stoecker, Arthur L. & Carter, Scott D., 2009. "Effect of Corn Price on Profitability of Control Vs Phytase Enhanced Diet of Hogs," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46864, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:revage:v:23:y:2001:i:1:p:265-274.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press or Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.