IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/332580.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic Partnership Agreements and Africa’s integration and transformation agenda: the cases of West Africa and Eastern and Southern Africa regions

Author

Listed:
  • Mevel, Simon
  • Valensisi, Giovanni
  • Karingi, Stephen

Abstract

Significant progress have been made recently by African countries towards the signing of the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) with the European Union (EU), and following twelve years of intense negotiations. However, unilateral trade preferences granted to African economies to a WTO-compatible reciprocal –albeit asymmetric– agreement, such as the EPAs, has traditionally raised numerous concerns, notably on the potential impact on Africa’s regional integration and development prospects. These questions are all the more relevant at the current juncture, characterized by the growing momentum towards the establishment of the Continental Free Trade Area (CFTA) by the indicative date of 2017. In light of this, an empirical assessment using the MIRAGE computable general equilibrium (CGE) model was undertaken to sheds new lights on these issues, focusing on the cases of West African and ESA regions. Findings show that if trade benefits are to be expected for both Africa and the EU –following the signing of EPAs– these will esentially be concentrated in a handful of non-industrial sectors and countries as far as Africa is concerned. Moreover, it will be detrimental to intra-African trade and reducing tariff revenues for African governments. Nevertheless, the establishment of a CFTA before the EPAs are fully implemented would not only preserve gains from EPAs but reverse its negative effects on African economies. Indeed, intra-African trade would then be strongly stimulated, especially in industrial products, thereby offering positive perspectives for Africa’s structural transformation. The reduction of costs to trade across borders would enhance further the benefits. Therefore, Africa should seize the opportunity offered by the transitional period under EPAs to effectively deepen its regional integration process.

Suggested Citation

  • Mevel, Simon & Valensisi, Giovanni & Karingi, Stephen, 2015. "The Economic Partnership Agreements and Africa’s integration and transformation agenda: the cases of West Africa and Eastern and Southern Africa regions," Conference papers 332580, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332580
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/332580/files/7649.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Boumellassa, Houssein & Debucquet, David Laborde & Mitaritonna, Cristina, 2009. "A picture of tariff protection across the World in 2004: MAcMap-HS6, Version 2," IFPRI discussion papers 903, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2008. "The potential cost of a failed Doha Round," Issue briefs 56, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    2. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2010. "Eight Years of Doha Trade Talks: Where Do We Stand?," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 11(2), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Itakura, Ken, 2014. "Impact of liberalization and improved connectivity and facilitation in ASEAN," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 2-11.
    4. Douillet, Mathilde, 2011. "Which trade integration scheme can best help Sub-Saharan Africa develop and export more processed agricultural goods?:," IFPRI discussion papers 1119, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    5. Mevel, Simon & Moll de Alba, Jaime & Oulmane, Nassim, 2015. "Regional trade integration and trade facilitation as a pro-industrialization policy tool: the case of North Africa’s countries," Conference papers 332590, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Springmann, Marco & Mason-D'Croz, Daniel & Robinson, Sherman & Wiebe, Keith & Scarborough, Peter, 2016. "The health co-benefits of a global greenhouse-gas tax on food," Conference papers 332766, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    7. Bouet, Antoine & Laborde, David, 2008. "The potential cost of a failed Doha Round:," Issue briefs 56, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    8. Matthews, Alan & Salvatici, Luca & Scoppola, Margherita, 2017. "Trade Impacts of Agricultural Support in the EU," Commissioned Papers 252767, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Maria Cipollina & David Laborde Debucquet & Luca Salvatici, 2017. "The tide that does not raise all boats: an assessment of EU preferential trade policies," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 153(1), pages 199-231, February.
    10. Gouel, Christophe & Mitaritonna, Cristina & Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2011. "Sensitive products in the Doha negotiations: The case of European and Japanese market access," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2395-2403.
    11. Sulser, Timothy B. & Ringler, Claudia & Zhu, Tingju & Msangi, Siwa & Bryan, Elizabeth & Rosegrant, Mark W., 2009. "Green and blue water accounting in the Limpopo and Nile Basins: Implications for food and agricultural policy," IFPRI discussion papers 907, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    12. Niemi, Janne, 2018. "Short-run and long-run food import elasticities with persistent trading habits," Working Papers 111, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    13. Valentina Raimondi & Margherita Scoppola & Alessandro Olper, 2012. "Preference erosion and the developing countries exports to the EU: a dynamic panel gravity approach," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 148(4), pages 707-732, December.
    14. Joaquim Bento Ferreira-Filho & Mark Horridge, 2011. "Ethanol Expansion and Indirect Land Use Change in Brazil," Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre Working Papers g-218, Victoria University, Centre of Policy Studies/IMPACT Centre.
    15. Bouët Antoine & Laborde-Debucquet David & Dienesch Elisa & Elliott Kimberly, 2012. "The Costs and Benefits of Duty-Free, Quota-Free Market Access for Poor Countries: Who and What Matters," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, June.
    16. Bouët Antoine & Laborde-Debucquet David & Dienesch Elisa & Elliott Kimberly, 2012. "The Costs and Benefits of Duty-Free, Quota-Free Market Access for Poor Countries: Who and What Matters," Journal of Globalization and Development, De Gruyter, vol. 3(1), pages 1-27, June.
    17. Maria Cipollina & Luca Salvatici, 2010. "The trade impact of European Union agricultural preferences," Journal of Economic Policy Reform, Taylor and Francis Journals, vol. 13(1), pages 87-106.
    18. Crozet, Matthieu & Lalanne, Guy & Poncet, Sandra, 2013. "Wholesalers in international trade," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-17.
    19. Anderson, Kym & Martin, Will & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique, 2013. "Estimating Effects of Price-Distorting Policies Using Alternative Distortions Databases," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 877-931, Elsevier.
    20. Mevel, Simon & Mathieu, Morgane, 2016. "Emergence of mega-regional trade agreements and the imperative for African economies to strategically enhance trade-related South-South Cooperation," Conference papers 332678, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:332580. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.