IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331458.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Evaluation of the Impact of Nigeria’s Trade and Investment Policy Reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Ogunkola, E. Olawale
  • Bankole, Abiodun S.
  • Adewuyi, Adeolu O.

Abstract

Current efforts at reforming Nigeria’s economy cover all known approaches to trade and investment reforms. At unilateral level the National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS) forms was adopted. Bilateral efforts manifests in the increasing number of bilateral investment treaties and bilateral trade agreements in the recent years. Efforts at regional level include intra-regional efforts under the auspices of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and extra-regional efforts as exemplified by the on-going negotiations of an Economic Partnership Agreement (EPA) between West African countries and the European Union (EU). Multilateral efforts are not lacking as Nigeria is actively engaged in the negotiations of Doha Development Round (DDR) of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Efforts at liberalizing trade and investment regimes in the country are not new as the country attempted structural adjustment programme (SAP) was pivoted on trade, exchange rate and investment reforms, perhaps the dimension and the speed at which the current efforts are being conducted are the new elements in the current wave of trade and investment reforms. Against the background of various attempts at liberalizing trade and investment policy regimes in Nigeria since the mid-1980s and the current efforts at negotiating and/or designing new trade and investment policy at unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral levels this paper presents an evaluation of past efforts with a view to informing the current efforts. Trade and investment theories and the linkages between them provides evidence on potential impacts of reforms on economic growth and performances; lessons from the design, implementation, expectation and effects of the past reforms provided rich information on the limit to realizing these potential effects. Notwithstanding that the nature and form of agreements are currently under negotiations, different estimates of possible impacts of these agreements have pointed to opportunities and challenges. The emerging trend points to a relatively fixed costs of reforms that are invariant to approach (unilateral, bilateral, regional and multilateral) to trade and investment reforms. However, the benefits appear to be dependent on the approach with multilateral promising the greatest benefits of all. More importantly the realization of the benefits not automatic and it may not even be realized at all if the reforms are truncated. There is, therefore, the need to manage the trade and investment reforms in order to optimize the potential benefits. The paper suggested some practical steps forward in guiding commitments to be made at the different levels of negotiations which include (1) tying the rate (depth, height and width) of reforms to be committed to progress made at addressing supply response constraints. (2) Given the diverse interest of stakeholders and the country in general, there is a greater role for external agent of restraint hence unilateral trade and investment reforms may not offer the best option. However, for other approaches to be optimally beneficial to the country there is the need for mainstreaming trade in the adopted development strategies and also for prioritizing issues at regional as well as at multilateral level. (3) There is a greater need in Nigeria for coordinating and harmonizing institutions and policies for improved performance of the economy. For instance, trade and investment policy reforms process needs to balance interests of stakeholders at both the design and implementation stages. The realization of optimum benefits from trade and investment reforms is contingent on complementary policies that among other things guarantee macroeconomic stability, a necessary and almost sufficient condition for sustainable pro-poor growth that is the long-term goal of the Nigerian economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Ogunkola, E. Olawale & Bankole, Abiodun S. & Adewuyi, Adeolu O., 2006. "An Evaluation of the Impact of Nigeria’s Trade and Investment Policy Reforms," Conference papers 331458, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331458/files/2168.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kehoe, Timothy J., 2002. "An Evaluation of the Performance of Applied General Equilibrium Models of the Impact of NAFTA," Conference papers 331066, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. Hertel, Thomas & Hummels, David & Ivanic, Maros & Keeney, Roman, 2007. "How confident can we be of CGE-based assessments of Free Trade Agreements?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 611-635, July.
    3. Varoudakis, Aristomene & Rossotto, Carlo Maria, 2004. "Regulatory reform and performance in telecommunications: unrealized potential in the MENA countries," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 59-78, February.
    4. Jesper Jensen & Thomas Rutherford & David Tarr, 2014. "The Impact of Liberalizing Barriers to Foreign Direct Investment in Services: The Case of Russian Accession to the World Trade Organization," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: APPLIED TRADE POLICY MODELING IN 16 COUNTRIES Insights and Impacts from World Bank CGE Based Projects, chapter 6, pages 125-149, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    5. Hoffmann, Anders N., 2003. "Imperfect competition in computable general equilibrium models -- a primer," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 119-139, January.
    6. Konan, Denise Eby & Maskus, Keith E., 2000. "Joint trade liberalization and tax reform in a small open economy: the case of Egypt," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 365-392, April.
    7. John Whalley, 2004. "Assessing the Benefits to Developing Countries of Liberalisation in Services Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1223-1253, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise KONAN & Ari Van ASSCHE, 2001. "Regulation, Market Structure and Service Trade Liberalization: A CGE Analysis," Middle East and North Africa 330400038, EcoMod.
    2. Konan, Denise Eby & Van Assche, Ari, 2007. "Regulation, market structure and service trade liberalization," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 24(6), pages 895-923, November.
    3. Cretegny, Laurent, 2009. "The Economics of Adaptation to Climate Change - An Integrated Assessment Framework," Conference papers 331822, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    4. María C. Latorre, 2009. "The economic analysis of multinationals and foreign direct investment: a review," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 191(4), pages 97-126, December.
    5. Latorre, María C. & Bajo-Rubio, Oscar & Gómez-Plana, Antonio G., 2009. "The effects of multinationals on host economies: A CGE approach," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 851-864, September.
    6. Joseph Francois & Bernard Hoekman, 2010. "Services Trade and Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 642-692, September.
    7. Bussolo, Maurizio & Niimi, Yoko, 2009. "Do Regional Trade Pacts Benefit the Poor? An Illustration from Dominican Republic--Central American Free Trade Agreement in Nicaragua," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 146-160, January.
    8. Konan, Denise Eby & Maskus, Keith E., 2006. "Quantifying the impact of services liberalization in a developing country," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 142-162, October.
    9. Koesler, Simon, 2014. "Specifying parameters in computable general equilibrium models using optimal fingerprint detection methods," ZEW Discussion Papers 14-092, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Gouel, Christophe & Mitaritonna, Cristina & Ramos, Maria Priscila, 2011. "Sensitive products in the Doha negotiations: The case of European and Japanese market access," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 2395-2403.
    11. Willenbockel, Dirk, 2004. "Specification choice and robustness in CGE trade policy analysis with imperfect competition," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 21(6), pages 1065-1099, December.
    12. Nuno Limão, 2016. "Preferential Trade Agreements," NBER Working Papers 22138, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. Abler, David G., 2006. "Approaches to Measuring the Effects of Trade Agreements," Commissioned Papers 140762, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    14. Keith Walsh, 2006. "Trade in Services: Does Gravity Hold? A Gravity Model Approach to Estimating Barriers to Services Trade," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp183, IIIS.
    15. Anderson, Kym, 2004. "Setting the Trade Policy Agenda: What Roles for Economists?," Working Papers 14574, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    16. Carbone, Jared C. & Helm, Carsten & Rutherford, Thomas F., 2009. "The case for international emission trade in the absence of cooperative climate policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 266-280, November.
    17. Dixon, Peter B. & Rimmer, Maureen T., 2013. "Validation in Computable General Equilibrium Modeling," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1271-1330, Elsevier.
    18. Christen, Elisabeth & Francois, Joseph & Hoekman, Bernard, 2013. "Computable General Equilibrium Modeling of Market Access in Services," Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, in: Peter B. Dixon & Dale Jorgenson (ed.), Handbook of Computable General Equilibrium Modeling, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 1601-1643, Elsevier.
    19. Li, Minghao & Balistreri, Edward J. & Zhang, Wendong, 2020. "The U.S.–China trade war: Tariff data and general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    20. Peter Dixon & Michael Jerie & Maureen Rimmer, 2016. "Modern Trade Theory for CGE Modelling: The Armington, Krugman and Melitz Models," Journal of Global Economic Analysis, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, vol. 1(1), pages 1-110, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.