IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/pugtwp/331180.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Impacts of the Eastern European Accession and the 2003-Reform of the CAP - Consequences for Individual Member Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Jensen, H.G.
  • Frandsen, S.E.

Abstract

At the Copenhagen European Council Meeting in December 2002 the European Union (EU) decided to enlarge the EU with ten new member states. In this study the impact of the accession for each of the EU-25 member states is analysed. In particular, results of the accession under different policy environments, including the impacts of the recently adopted reform af the Common Agricultural Policy, are presented. The analysis shows that agricultural supply responses will be very different across acceding countries and that the impact of decoupling direct support is significant. The supply response in the new member states will be significantly smaller in the grain sector, when direct support is decoupled. In the old EU member countries, decoupling of animal premiums will lead to a 7 to 10 per cent decline in the production of beef in the EU-15 and that the lowering of intervention prices in the dairy sector will imply that milk quotas, in some member countries of the EU-15, are no longer binding. Finally, rural factor income in the European Union increase by 3- 4 per cent due to the 2003-reform, i.e. including the impact of the decoupled single farm payment and the increased efficiency of agricultural production in all member states. In economic terms the enlargement of the EU with the 10 accession countries is affordable. The analysis supports the view that not alone does economic welfare improve in the EU-15 member states, but the reform also seem to be an attractive alternative to the Agenda 2000 approach, for both the old and the new member states. Both agricultural income and macroeconomic welfare improve.

Suggested Citation

  • Jensen, H.G. & Frandsen, S.E., 2004. "Impacts of the Eastern European Accession and the 2003-Reform of the CAP - Consequences for Individual Member Countries," Conference papers 331180, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/331180/files/1480.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaime de Melo, 2015. "Computable General Equilibrium Models for Trade Policy Analysis in Developing Countries: A Survey," World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Modeling Developing Countries' Policies in General Equilibrium, chapter 8, pages 141-175, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zuzana KŘÍSTKOVÁ & Andrea HABRYCHOVÁ, 2011. "Modelling direct payments to agriculture in a CGE Framework - analysis of the Czech Republic," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 57(11), pages 517-528.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eromenko, Igor, 2010. "Accession to the WTO. Computable General Equilibrium Analysis: the Case of Ukraine. Part I," MPRA Paper 67476, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Y. Qiang, 1999. "CGE Modelling and Australian Economics," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 99-04, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    3. Haider A. Khan, 2007. "Social Accounting Matrix: A Very Short Introduction for Economic Modeling," CIRJE F-Series CIRJE-F-477, CIRJE, Faculty of Economics, University of Tokyo.
    4. Ball, Sheryl & Feltenstein, Andrew, 2001. "Bank failures and fiscal austerity: policy prescriptions for a developing country," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 247-270, November.
    5. Robinson, Sherman & Burfisher, Mary E. & Hinojosa-Ojeda, Raul & Thierfelder, Karen E., 1993. "Agricultural policies and migration in a U.S.-Mexico free trade area: A computable general equilibrium analysis," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 15(5-6), pages 673-701.
    6. Mutambatsere, Emelly, 2006. "Trade Policy Reforms in the Cereals Sector of the SADC Region: Implications on Food Security," Working Papers 127055, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    7. Vennemo, Haakon & Aunan, Kristin & He, Jianwu & Hu, Tao & Li, Shantong & Rypd3al, Kristin, 2008. "Environmental impacts of China's WTO-accession," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 893-911, February.
    8. Young, Trevor, 1991. "The Theoretical and Empirical Analysis of Agricultural Trade of LDCs," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232830, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    9. Céline DE QUATREBARBES & Luc SAVARD & Dorothée BOCCANFUSO, 2011. "Can the removal of VAT Exemptions support the Poor? The Case of Niger," Working Papers 201106, CERDI.
    10. Hodjat Ghadimi, 2006. "A Dynamic CGE Analysis of Exhaustible Resources: The Case of an Oil Exporting Developing Country," Working Papers Working Paper 2006-07, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    11. Persson, Urban & Münster, Marie, 2016. "Current and future prospects for heat recovery from waste in European district heating systems: A literature and data review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 116-128.
    12. Emmanuel Athanassiou & Christos Kollias & Stavros Zografakis, 2002. "The Effects of Defence Spending Reductions: A CGE Estimation of the Foregone Peace Dividend in the Case of Greece," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 109-119.
    13. Van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique & Medvedev, Denis, 2010. "Climate change in Latin America: impacts and mitigation policy options," Libros de la CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 2590, May.
    14. Jeong-Soo OH & Phouphet Kyophilavong, 2015. "Trade Liberalization and Poverty in Developing Countries: Literature Survey," International Journal of Economics and Empirical Research (IJEER), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(2), pages 86-94, Fabruary.
    15. Meyer, Bernd & Ahlert, Gerd, 2019. "Imperfect Markets and the Properties of Macro-economic-environmental Models as Tools for Policy Evaluation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 80-87.
    16. repec:dau:papers:123456789/4936 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Mark J. Roberts & James R. Tybout, 1991. "Size Rationalization and Trade Exposure in Developing Countries," NBER Chapters, in: Empirical Studies of Commercial Policy, pages 169-200, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Karen Thierfelder & Sherman Robinson, 2003. "Trade and Tradability: Exports, Imports, and Factor Markets in the Salter‐Swan Model," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 79(244), pages 103-111, March.
    19. Devarajan, Shantayanan & Robinson, Sherman, 2002. "The influence of computable general equilibrium models on policy," TMD discussion papers 98, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    20. Mazhar Mughal, 2010. "Explaining income inequalities in the developing countries- the role of human capital," Post-Print hal-01881841, HAL.
    21. repec:rri:wpaper:200607 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Bergquist, Lauren & Faber, Benjamin & Fally, Thibault & Hoelzlein, Matthias & Miguel, Edward & Rodríguez-Clare, Andres, 2022. "Scaling Agricultural Policy Interventions," CEPR Discussion Papers 17737, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:pugtwp:331180. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gtpurus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.