IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ndtr09/207598.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Location Problem for Intermodal Terminal in North Dakota

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Eun Su
  • Farahmand, Kambiz

Abstract

Container drayage trips have become a major concern for agricultural products exporters in the Northern Great Plains region. In addition to the increase in number of trips and the cost of travel along with the efforts of acquiring empty container and truckers, this increase generates congestion and emission in the metropolitan hub cities. In this research, distance between farm manufacturers to intermodal terminals is considered. The research is conducted ideally under the indifference of current situations of the capacity and financing issues. When the location is selected, the intermodal terminal can be an alternative for the future development in the consensus of various stakeholders for the economic impact and public issues. Origin-Destination distance matrix from ORNL was used to connect demand points to the nearest intermodal terminal using GIS. From the analysis, Scenario I (Dilworth) was selected as an appropriate intermodal location for the shippers in the research area. The selection was measured by the total intermodal logistics cost and service distance. The selected scenario presents more travel on highways and less rail mile than the scenario for which nothing was selected as well as lower total logistics cost.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Eun Su & Farahmand, Kambiz, 2009. "Location Problem for Intermodal Terminal in North Dakota," 50th Annual Transportation Research Forum, Portland, Oregon, March 16-18, 2009 207598, Transportation Research Forum.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207598
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.207598
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/207598/files/2009_23_LocationProblem_paper.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.207598?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. M Luo & T A Grigalunas, 2003. "A Spatial-Economic Multimodal Transportation Simulation Model For US Coastal Container Ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 5(2), pages 158-178, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fan, Lei & Wilson, William W. & Dahl, Bruce, 2015. "Risk analysis in port competition for containerized imports," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(3), pages 743-753.
    2. Yuen, Chi-lok Andrew & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2012. "Port competitiveness from the users' perspective: An analysis of major container ports in China and its neighboring countries," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 34-40.
    3. Yuen, Andrew Chi-lok & Zhang, Anming & Cheung, Waiman, 2013. "Foreign participation and competition: A way to improve the container port efficiency in China?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 220-231.
    4. Su-Han Woo & Stephen Pettit & Anthony Beresford & Dong-Wook Kwak, 2012. "Seaport Research: A Decadal Analysis of Trends and Themes Since the 1980s," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 351-377, January.
    5. Likun Wang & Anne Goodchild & Yong Wang, 2018. "The effect of distance on cargo flows: a case study of Chinese imports and their hinterland destinations," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 456-475, September.
    6. Jones, Dean A. & Farkas, Julie L. & Bernstein, Orr & Davis, Chad E. & Turk, Adam & Turnquist, Mark A. & Nozick, Linda K. & Levine, Brian & Rawls, Carmen G. & Ostrowski, Scott D. & Sawaya, William, 2011. "U.S. import/export container flow modeling and disruption analysis," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 3-14.
    7. Song, Dong-Ping & Lyons, Andrew & Li, Dong & Sharifi, Hossein, 2016. "Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 75-96.
    8. Branislav Dragović & Ernestos Tzannatos & Nam Kuy Park, 2017. "Simulation modelling in ports and container terminals: literature overview and analysis by research field, application area and tool," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 4-34, March.
    9. Jasmine Lam & Wei Yap, 2006. "A measurement and Comparison of Cost Competitiveness of Container Ports in Southeast Asia," Transportation, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 641-654, November.
    10. Yanni Huang & Taha Hossein Rashidi & Lauren Gardner, 2018. "Modelling the global maritime container network," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 20(3), pages 400-420, September.
    11. Jacon Kronbak & Kevin Cullinane, 2011. "Captive and Contestable Port Hinterlands: Modelling and Visualization using GIS," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 16, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    12. Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Yap, Wei Yim, 2011. "Dynamics of liner shipping network and port connectivity in supply chain systems: analysis on East Asia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 1272-1281.
    13. Lauri Lättilä & Olli-Pekka Hilmola, 2012. "Forecasting long-term demand of largest Finnish sea ports," International Journal of Applied Management Science, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 4(1), pages 52-79.
    14. Heaver, Trevor, 2006. "The Evolution and Challenges of Port Economics," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 16(1), pages 11-41, January.
    15. Mahmood Humaiyid Hamed Al-Wahaibi, 2019. "Logistics Hubs in Oman and Political Uncertainty in the Gulf," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 6(2), pages 109-153, June.
    16. Jordi Caballé Valls & Peter W. Langen & Lorena García Alonso & José Ángel Vallejo Pinto, 2020. "Understanding Port Choice Determinants and Port Hinterlands: Findings from an Empirical Analysis of Spain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(1), pages 53-67, March.
    17. Tu, Ningwen & Adiputranto, Dimas & Fu, Xiaowen & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2018. "Shipping network design in a growth market: The case of Indonesia," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 108-125.
    18. Furkan Oztanriseven & Heather Nachtmann, 2020. "Modeling dynamic behavior of navigable inland waterways," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(2), pages 173-195, June.
    19. Kashiha, Mona & Thill, Jean-Claude & Depken, Craig A., 2016. "Shipping route choice across geographies: Coastal vs. landlocked countries," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-14.
    20. Wei Yim Yap *† & Jasmine S. L. Lam, 2004. "An interpretation of inter-container port relationships from the demand perspective," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(4), pages 337-355, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural and Food Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ndtr09:207598. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.trforum.org/journal/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.