IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nc194o/233053.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Benefits to U.S. Agriculture From Terminating European Oilseed Subsidies

Author

Listed:
  • Gleckler, James
  • Tweeten, Luther

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Gleckler, James & Tweeten, Luther, 1990. "Benefits to U.S. Agriculture From Terminating European Oilseed Subsidies," Occasional Papers 233053, Regional Research Project NC-194: Organization and Performance of World Food Systems.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nc194o:233053
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.233053
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/233053/files/nc194-op-14.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.233053?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sullivan, John & Wainio, John & Roningen, Vernon, 1989. "A Database For Trade Liberalization Studies," Staff Reports 278178, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gleckler, James & Tweeten, Luther G., 1990. "Common Agricultural Policy Rebalancing: The Basis for Possible Agreement," 1990: The Environment, Government Policies, and International Trade Meeting, December 1990, San Diego, CA 50883, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Suwartini, Endang & Coffin, H. Garth & Gunjal, Kisan, 1997. "Economic welfare analysis of policy-induced structural change in the Indonesian poultry industry," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 16(3), pages 237-243, August.
    2. Philip C. Abbott & Panu K. S. Kallio, 1996. "Implications of Game Theory for International Agricultural Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 738-744.
    3. Antônio Salazar P. Brandão & Will J. Martin, 1993. "Implications of agricultural trade liberalization for the developing countries," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 8(4), pages 313-343, June.
    4. Klaus Mittenzwei & David S. Bullock & Klaus Salhofer, 2012. "Towards a theory of policy timing," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 56(4), pages 583-596, October.
    5. Johnson, D. Demcey & Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara & Dahl, Bruce L. & Dooley, Frank J., 1996. "Trade In Minor Oilseeds: A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis Of Sunflower And Canola," Agricultural Economics Reports 23346, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Price, Gregory K. & Lin, William W. & Falck-Zepeda, Jose Benjamin & Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge, 2003. "Size And Distribution Of Market Benefits From Adopting Biotech Crops," Technical Bulletins 33562, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    7. Paarlberg, Philip L. & Lee, John G., 1998. "Import Rules For Fmd Contaminated Beef," Working Papers 14599, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    8. Abler, David G & Shortle, James S, 1992. "Environmental and Farm Commodity Policy Linkages in the U.S. and the EC," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 19(2), pages 197-217.
    9. Tweeten, Luther G. & Sharples, Jerry A. & Evers-Smith, Linda, 1997. "Impact Of Cfta/Nafta On U.S. And Canadian Agriculture," Working Papers 28320, Ohio State University, Department of Agricultural, Environmental and Development Economics.
    10. de Gorter, Harry & Nielson, David J. & Rausser, Gordon C., 1990. "The political economy of productive and predatory policies: a case study from agriculture," Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley, Working Paper Series qt0q9495xv, Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, UC Berkeley.
    11. Neff, Liana C. Cuffman, 1990. "The 1990 Farm Bill And Developing Countries," 1990 Annual meeting, August 5-8, Vancouver, Canada 270907, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    12. Lopez, Rigoberto A. & He, Xi & De Falcis, Eleonora, 2017. "What Drives China’s New Agricultural Subsidies?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 279-292.
    13. Gardiner, Walter H. & Roningen, Vernon O. & Liu, Karen, 1989. "Elasticities In The Trade Liberalization Database," Staff Reports 278197, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    14. Mittenzwei, Klaus & Bullock, David S. & Salhofer, Klaus & Kola, Jukka, 2011. "Towards a Theory of Policy Making," 2011 International Congress, August 30-September 2, 2011, Zurich, Switzerland 114639, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Harwood, Joy L. & Bailey, Kenneth W., 1990. "The World Wheat Market--Government Intervention and Multilateral Policy Reform," Staff Reports 278264, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    16. Tobey, James A. & Reilly, John M. & Kane, Sally, 1992. "Economic Implications Of Global Climate Change For World Agriculture," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 17(1), pages 1-10, July.
    17. Taheripour, Farzad, 2006. "Economic Impacts of the Conservation Reserve Program: A General Equilibrium Framework," 2006 Annual meeting, July 23-26, Long Beach, CA 21346, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Patterson, Paul M & Abbott, Philip C, 1994. "Further Evidence on Competition in the US Grain Export Trade," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 429-437, December.
    19. Krissoff, Barry & Sharples, Jerry A., 1993. "Preferential Trading Arrangements In Western Hemisphere Countries," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11, April.
    20. Gunasekera, H. Don B.H. & Andrews, Neil P. & Haszler, Henry C. & Chapman, John N., 1991. "Agricultural policy reform in China," Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences (ABARES) Archive 316170, Australian Government, Australian Bureau of Agricultural and Resource Economics and Sciences.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Crop Production/Industries;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nc194o:233053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.