IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ifma22/345998.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Trade Regimes And Welfare In Lesotho

Author

Listed:
  • Bahta, Y.T.
  • Lombard, W.A.
  • van Niekerk, H.N.

Abstract

The main objective the study was to assess the impact of the erosion of existing preferential trade access on the economy of Lesotho using a Social Accounting Matrix (SAM) and Computable General Equilibrium model (CGE). The erosion of preferential trade access negatively affect Lesotho’s international trade, as textile is the country’s largest export industry by far. It appears also as the result of erosion the textile industry reduce the quantity of textile products exported; price of imported textiles increase and the quantity decrease, as a result, negatively affect Lesotho household’s welfare measured in terms of equivalent variation (EV), particularly urban area. The probable effect on some macro-economic variables cannot be regards as significant. The erosion of preferential access trade certainly illustrates the need for Lesotho to strive towards diversification of export products. Export diversification is a complex issue. It is not simply a matter of looking for the next miracle product to give a magic answer. It is about providing a solid infrastructure within an economy and building upon that foundation this includes strong regional and global linkages. It is about where to put your priorities in order to maximise the marginal gain to the economy of Lesotho.

Suggested Citation

  • Bahta, Y.T. & Lombard, W.A. & van Niekerk, H.N., 2022. "Trade Regimes And Welfare In Lesotho," 23rd Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2022 345998, International Farm Management Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ifma22:345998
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.345998
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/345998/files/trade_regimes_and_welfare_in_lesotho.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.345998?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Westcott, Paul C. & Price, J. Michael, 2001. "Analysis Of The U.S. Commodity Loan Program With Marketing Loan Provisions," Agricultural Economic Reports 34035, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    2. Scott McDonald, 2002. "Papers from a Symposium on CGE Modelling of Trade Policies in African Agriculture Introduction," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(2), pages 361-363, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bahta, Y.T. & Lombard, W.A. & van Niekerk, H.N., 2022. "Trade Regimes And Welfare In Lesotho," Agricultural Economics Society (AES) 98th Annual Conference, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK, March 18-20, 2024 345998, Agricultural Economics Society (AES).
    2. Brandão, Antônio Salazar P. & Lima, Elcyon Caiado Rocha, 2006. "Impacts of the U.S. subsidy to soybeans on World prices, production and exports," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 44(4), pages 1-46, December.
    3. Gardner, Bruce L., 2008. "Distortions to Agricultural Incentives in the United States and Canada," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 48573, World Bank.
    4. Barry Goodwin & Randy Schnepf & Erik Dohlman, 2005. "Modelling soybean prices in a changing policy environment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(3), pages 253-263.
    5. Ruben N. Lubowski & Andrew J. Plantinga & Robert N. Stavins, 2008. "What Drives Land-Use Change in the United States? A National Analysis of Landowner Decisions," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 84(4), pages 529-550.
    6. Westcott, Paul C., 2003. "Perspectives On Impacts Of The 2002 U.S. Farm Act," Proceedings of the 9th Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 2003: Farm Policy Development and Policy Tensions under NAFTA 16816, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    7. Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Fletcher, Stanley M. & Revoredo-Giha, Cesar, 2005. "Can Rank-Order Tournaments Improve Efficiency of Quality Differentiated Crop Markets Under Marketing Loan Program Operation? The Case of U.S. Peanuts," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24703, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Fousseini Traore, 2011. "The impact of the United States subsidies on world cotton price: evidence from ARDL bounds tests," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(28), pages 4193-4201.
    9. Nadolnyak, Denis A. & Fletcher, Stanley M., 2006. "Quality Premiums and the Post-Harvest Spot Market Thinness: The Case of U.S. Peanuts," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25274, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Andrew Schmitz & Troy G. Schmitz & Frederick Rossi, 2006. "Agricultural Subsidies in Developed Countries: Impact on Global Welfare," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 28(3), pages 416-425.
    11. Gardner, Bruce L., 2002. "North American Agricultural Policies And Effects On Western Hemisphere Markets Since 1995, With A Focus On Grains And Oilseeds," Working Papers 28602, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    12. Luther Tweeten & Carl Zulauf, 2008. "Farm price and income policy: lessons from history," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(2), pages 145-160.
    13. Brandão, Antônio Salazar P. & Lima, Elcyon Caiado Rocha, 2006. "Impacts of the U.S. subsidy to soybeans on World prices, production and exports," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 44(4), January.
    14. Timothy E. Josling & Stefan Tangermann, 2015. "Transatlantic Food and Agricultural Trade Policy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15889.
    15. Westcott, Paul C. & Meyer, Leslie A., 2003. "U.S. Cotton Supply Response Under The 2002 Farm Act," Agricultural Outlook Forum 2003 33171, United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Outlook Forum.
    16. Khondker, Bazlul H. & Raihan, Selim, 2004. "Welfare and Poverty Impacts of Policy Reforms in Bangladesh: A General Equilibrium Approach," Conference papers 331207, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    17. Gardner, Bruce L., 2002. "U.S./Canadian Agricultural Policies And Effects On Western Hemisphere Markets Since 1995, With A Focus On Grains And Oilseeds," Working Papers 28577, University of Maryland, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    18. Cai, Ruohong & Bergstrom, John C. & Mullen, Jeffrey D. & Wetzstein, Michael E., 2011. "Assessing the Effects of Climate Change on Farm Production and Profitability: Dynamic Simulation Approach," 2011 Annual Meeting, July 24-26, 2011, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 103420, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    19. Young, C. Edwin & Skully, David W. & Westcott, Paul C. & Hoffman, Linwood A., 2005. "Economic Analysis of Base Acre and Payment Yield Designations Under the 2002 U.S. Farm Act," Economic Research Report 33594, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    20. Hoffman, Linwood A. & Young, C. Edwin & Westcott, Paul C. & Childs, Nathan W., 2003. "Domestic Support for the U.S. Rice Sector and the WTO: Implications of the 2002 Farm Act," 2003 Annual meeting, July 27-30, Montreal, Canada 21929, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ifma22:345998. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ifmaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.