IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaaeo4/197535.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Lexicographic Wants in LDC Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Parton, Kevin A.

Abstract

In relation to the economic analysis of decision making on small farms in less developed countries (LDCs), two issues are examined-the irreducibility of wants and the social context of the decision maker. The purpose is to show that, by ignoring these issues, the agr1cultural economics discipline could, in many instances, be overlooking significant relationships in the appraisal of rural development policy. Irreducibility of wants means, m the jargon of economic theory, that overall indifference across product space in individual preference arrangements 1s lacking. The implication of irreducibility is that wants must be ordered lexicographically. When wants are ordered m such a manner, the social context of the decision maker becomes paramount. An investigation of the methods of other disciplines shows that the lexicographic system of ordering is m strong accord with the approaches that sociologists, human psychologists, and economic anthropologists take to analyzing small farm decision making m LDCs. Indeed, by being unconstrained by the continuous preference function system of neoclassical economics, those disciplines appear to have the potential of examinmg much more fertile ground in showing what actually promotes rural development.

Suggested Citation

  • Parton, Kevin A., 1987. "Lexicographic Wants in LDC Agriculture," 1987 Occasional Paper Series No. 4 197535, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo4:197535
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.197535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/197535/files/agecon-occpapers-1987-069_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.197535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCloskey, Donald N, 1983. "The Rhetoric of Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 21(2), pages 481-517, June.
    2. John L. Dillon & Pasquale L. Scandizzo, 1978. "Risk Attitudes of Subsistence Farmers in Northeast Brazil: A Sampling Approach," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(3), pages 425-435.
    3. Coleman, James S, 1984. "Introducing Social Structure into Economic Analysis," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 74(2), pages 84-88, May.
    4. Anderson, Jock R. & Dillon, John L. & Hardaker, Brian, 1977. "Agricultural Decision Analysis," Monographs: Applied Economics, AgEcon Search, number 288652, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Young, Douglas & Lin, William & Pope, Rulon & Robison, Lindon & Selley, Roger, 1979. "Risk Preferences Of Agricultual Producers:Their Measurement And Use," Risk Management in Agriculture: Behavioral, Managerial, and Policy Issues, January 25-26, 1979, San Francisco, California 271459, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    2. Lien, Gudbrand, 2002. "Non-parametric estimation of decision makers' risk aversion," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 27(1), pages 75-83, May.
    3. Basanta R. Dhungana & Peter L. Nuthall & Gilbert V. Nartea, 2004. "Measuring the economic inefficiency of Nepalese rice farms using data envelopment analysis," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 48(2), pages 347-369, June.
    4. Gomez-Limon, Jose A. & Arriaza, Manuel & Riesgo, Laura, 2003. "An MCDM analysis of agricultural risk aversion," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 569-585, December.
    5. Knowles, Glenn J., 1980. "Estimating Utility Functions," Risk Analysis in Agriculture: Research and Educational Developments, January 16-18, 1980, Tucson, Arizona 271570, Regional Research Projects > W-149: An Economic Evaluation of Managing Market Risks in Agriculture.
    6. Arriaza Balmón, Manuel & Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio, 2003. "Modelling Farmers' Response To A Decoupled Subsidy Via Multi-Attribute Utility Theory And E-V Analysis," 2003 Annual Meeting, August 16-22, 2003, Durban, South Africa 25925, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    7. Gomez-Limon, Jose Antonio & Riesgo, Laura & Arriaza Balmón, Manuel, 2002. "Agricultural Risk Aversion Revisited: A Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24827, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    8. Kögl, H., 1980. "Erklärung und Prognose einzelbetrieblicher Entwicklung mit Hilfe von Risikonutzenfunktionen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 17.
    9. J. Brian Hardaker & Jock R. Anderson & John L. Dillon, 1984. "Perspectives On Assessing The Impacts Of Improved Agricultural Technologies In Developing Countries," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 28(2-3), pages 87-108, 08-12.
    10. Ramaratnam, S. Sri & Rister, M. Edward & Bessler, David A. & Novak, James, 1986. "Risk Attitudes and Farm/Producer Attributes: A Case Study of Texas Coastal Bend Grain Sorghum Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 18(2), pages 85-96, December.
    11. J. Hope & J. Lingard, 1992. "The Influence Of Risk Aversion On The Uptake Of Set‐Aside: A Motad And Crp Approach," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 401-411, September.
    12. Anderson, Jock R., 1978. "A Note on Two-Point Risks, Certainty Equivalents and Quadratic Preference," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 46(02), pages 1-3, August.
    13. Runge, C. Ford, 2006. "Agricultural Economics: A Brief Intellectual History," Staff Papers 13649, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    14. Hardaker, J. B., 1982. "Fundamental Aspects Of Risk And Uncertainty In Agriculture," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 21(2), October.
    15. Hurley, Terrance M., 2010. "A review of agricultural production risk in the developing world," Working Papers 188476, HarvestChoice.
    16. Lagerkvist, Carl Johan, 2005. "Assessing farmers' risk attitudes based on economic, social, personal, and environmental sources of risk: evidence from Sweden," 2005 Annual meeting, July 24-27, Providence, RI 19361, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    17. Sudha Narayanan, 2012. "Safe gambles? Farmer perceptions of transactional certainty and risk-return tradeoffs in contract farming schemes in Southern India," Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai Working Papers 2012-021, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, Mumbai, India.
    18. Thampapillai DJ. & Maleka, P. T. & Milimo, J. T., 1992. "Quantification of the trade-offs in Zambia between environment, employment, income and food-security," ILO Working Papers 992880613402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Eidman, V., 1989. "Quantifying and managing risk in agriculture," 1989 Annual Conference, September 25-27, Bloemfontein, South Africa 314723, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA).
    20. repec:ilo:ilowps:288061 is not listed on IDEAS
    21. Wilfred Dolfsma, 2001. "Economists as subjects: Toward a psychology of economists," Forum for Social Economics, Springer;The Association for Social Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 77-88, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo4:197535. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.