IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaaeo2/197129.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developed and Developing Countries: Their Effects on Efficiency, Distribution, and Rural Change

Author

Listed:
  • Bale, Malcolm D.
  • Lutz, Ernst

Abstract

Agriculture is the main source of food for the world, and food is the basic input in the daily sustenance of humans. Yet, in many parts of the world there is insufficient food, which in turn implies inadequate agricultural output. The reasons for inadequate agricultural production are many and varied, ranging from poor distribution and poor production techniques to political intervention at various levels in the global agricultural complex. The most important reason for deficie.nt agricultural output is difficult to ascertain, but Schultz (1977) left no doubt as to his ranking of the causes. He suggested that the level of agricultural production depends not so much on technical considerations, but in large measure "on what governments do to agriculture." Schultz has long been the most ardent and eloquent spokesman of this position. See, for example, Schultz, 1964, 1977, and 1978. Export taxes on agricultural products provide government revenue and keep domesitc prices low, product price supports in developed countries maintain farm incomes and provide surpluses which in turn find their way to developing country markets to further depress domestic farm prices, and agricultural inputs are frequently either taxed or subsidized. Yet, the magnitude of these effects on agricultural output, income distribution between producers and consumers, efficiency, and on rural-urban migration is often not fully appreciated. This paper discusses government intervention in agricultural price determination, drawing on welfare theory to quantify the economic impacts on the previously mentioned variables. In this study, we examine France, Federal Republic of Germany, United Kingdom, Japan, Yugoslavia, Argentina, Egypt, Pakistan, and Thailand. The general theme of the paper is that the agricultural policies pursued by developing countries produce effects which are diametrically opposite to those produced by the policies of many developed countries, and that the policies of both are costly in terms of global welfare. Peterson addresses the developing country side of this question in a somewhat different manner.

Suggested Citation

  • Bale, Malcolm D. & Lutz, Ernst, 1981. "Agricultural Pricing Policies in Developed and Developing Countries: Their Effects on Efficiency, Distribution, and Rural Change," 1981 Occasional Paper Series No. 2 197129, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo2:197129
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.197129
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/197129/files/agecon-occpapers-1981-053_1_.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.197129?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Malcolm D. Bale & Bruce L. Greenshields, 1978. "Japanese Agricultural Distortions and Their Welfare Value," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 60(1), pages 59-64.
    2. Currie, John Martin & Murphy, John A & Schmitz, Andrew, 1971. "The Concept of Economic Surplus and its Use in Economic Analysis," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 81(324), pages 741-799, December.
    3. Willis L. Peterson, 1979. "International Farm Prices and the Social Cost of Cheap Food Policies," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 61(1), pages 12-21.
    4. Malcolm D. Bale & Ernst Lutz, 1981. "Price Distortions in Agriculture and Their Effects: An International Comparison," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 63(1), pages 8-22.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Van Kooten, G. C. & Spriggs, John & Schmitz, Andrew, 1989. "The Impact of Canadian Commodity Stabilization Programs on Risk Reduction and the Supply of Agricultural Commodities," Working Papers 244037, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada.
    2. Wiebelt, Manfred & Herrmann, Roland & Schenck, Patricia & Thiele, Rainer, 1992. "Discrimination against agriculture in developing countries?," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 458, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    3. Coyle, Barry & Chambers, Robert G. & Schmitz, Andrew, 1986. "Economic Gains from Agricultural Trade: A Review and Bibliography," Miscellaneous Publications 319990, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    4. van Schalkwyk, H. D. & van Zyl, J. & Doyer, O. T., 1996. "Welfare Effects Of Regulation In Lesotho'S Wheat Market," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 35(4), December.
    5. Tyers, Rodney & Anderson, Kym, 1985. "Price, Trade and Welfare Effects of Agricultural Protection: The Case of East Asia," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 53(03), pages 1-28, December.
    6. van Schalkwyk, Herman D. & van Zyl, Johan & Botha, P.W. & Bayley, B., 1997. "Deregulation of Lesotho's maize market," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 36(4), pages 1-12, December.
    7. Gautam, Virender, 1992. "Identification of patterns of producer and consumer protection levels in food commodities: a cross-country, aggregate and commodity-specific analysis," ISU General Staff Papers 1992010108000017588, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    8. da Silva, J.A.B.B. & Young, T., 1984. "Distortions of Agricultural Incentives: An Analysis of the Effects of Government Policy on the Brazilian Beef and Dairy Sectors," Manchester Discussion Papers in Development Studies 232617, University of Manchester, School of Economics, International Development Centre.
    9. Mashinini, Nkosazana N. & Obi, Ajuruchukwu & van Schalkwyk, Herman D., 2006. "Deregulation of the Maize Marketing System of Swaziland and Implications for Food Security," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25511, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. de Gorter, Harry & Tsur, Yacov, 1989. "Explaining Price Policy Bias In Agriculture: A Politician-Voter Interaction Approach," Staff Papers 13388, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    11. Richard Pomfret, 1978. "The economic consequences for Israel of free trade in manufactured goods with the EEC," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 114(3), pages 526-539, September.
    12. Zuleta C., Juan Carlos, 1986. "Country Size, Level Of Development, Relative Importance Of Agriculture And Agricultural Research In Ldc'S," Staff Papers 13280, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    13. Jeffrey T. LaFrance, 1990. "Incomplete Demand Systems And Semilogarithmic Demand Models," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 34(2), pages 118-131, August.
    14. Javelosa, Josyline C. & Schmitz, Andrew, 2006. "Costs and Benefits of a WTO Dispute: Philippine Bananas and the Australian Market," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 7(1), pages 1-26.
    15. D.-L. Phan, 1989. "Politique agricole commune et évolution de l'avantage comparatif : les produits agro-alimentaires (1973-1983)," Cahiers d'Economie et Sociologie Rurales, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 10, pages 5-23.
    16. Economic Evaluation Team, USDA Interagency Working Group on Boll Weevil Programs, 1981. "Economic Evaluation of Beltwide Boll Weevil/Cotton Insect Management Programs (Appendix B)," Staff Reports 333513, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    17. Fischer, Martin L. & Hammond, Jerome W. & Dahl, Dale C., 1981. "Impacts Of Farm Supply Cooperatives On Oligopolistic Farm Input Markets: A Theoretical Analysis," Staff Papers 13746, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
    18. Boussard, Jean-Marc & Gérard, Françoise & Piketty, Marie Gabrielle, 2005. "Evaluating the Benefits from Liberalization: are Standard Walrassian Models Relevant?," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232587, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    19. Scobie, Grant M., 1976. "Who Benefits From Agricultural Research?," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 44(04), pages 1-6, December.
    20. Jarrett, Frank G. & Lindner, Robert K., 1977. "Research Benefits Revisited," Review of Marketing and Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(04), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaaeo2:197129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.