IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae06/25709.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Introducing Different Land Uses (Irrigated and Non-Irrigated) in Policy Analysis Modelling for Mediterranean Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Casado, Jose Maria
  • Gracia, Azucena

Abstract

The arable crop sector in Spain is highly dependent of the Community subsidies and account for 33% of total transfers received by the Community. Then, it is expected that the introduction of the Single Farm Payment (SFP) will drive important changes in the arable crop production in Spain. The quantitative assessment of the SFP impacts on the arable crop sector in Spain is the overall objective of this paper. To achieve this goal, an econometric, dynamic, multi-product and partial equilibrium commodity model has been built disaggregating between irrigated and non-irrigated land use for cereals called Spanish Econometric Simulation of Agricultural Policies (SESAP). Results indicated that the introduction of the SFP has only induced considerable changes from the Agenda 2000 in the supply side, having found only small changes in imports and exports, and insignificant or null changes in domestic use. Cereals and oilseeds production is expected higher decreases under the SFP scenario than under the Agenda 2000. The main differences between irrigated and non-irrigated production of the different cereals are two. Wheat and barley are mainly produced in non-irrigated land where production shows less dependence on policy changes in the case of wheat and have a positive impact in the case of barley. However, barely and maize irrigated production would have remained constant under the Agenda 2000 but a decrease of 25% is predicted under the SFP scenario. In addition, maize is mainly produced in irrigated land, and the non-irrigated production will enormously decrease until almost disappear in the near future.

Suggested Citation

  • Casado, Jose Maria & Gracia, Azucena, 2006. "Introducing Different Land Uses (Irrigated and Non-Irrigated) in Policy Analysis Modelling for Mediterranean Countries," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25709, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25709
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.25709
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/25709/files/cp060510.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.25709?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Conforti, Piero, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Main Partial Equilibrium Models," Working Papers 14806, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    2. Casado, José María & Gracia, Azucena, 2005. "An Assessment of the Luxembourg Agreement on the Spanish Agricultural Sector: an Econometric Model," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232589, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. de Muro, Pasquale & Salvatici, Luca, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Multisectoral Models," Working Papers 14804, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    4. M.H.C. Komen & J.H.M. Peerlings, 1996. "WAGEM: an applied general equilibrium model for agricultural and environmental policy analysis," Mansholt Working Papers 04-96, Wageningen University, Mansholt Graduate School of Social Sciences.
    5. Conforti, Piero & Londero, Pierluigi, 2001. "Aglink: The Oecd Partial Equilibrium Model," Working Papers 14808, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    6. Albisu, Luis M & Blandford, David, 1983. "An Area Response Model for Perennial Plants and Its Application to Spanish Oranges and Mandarins," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 10(2), pages 175-184.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ernesto Jesús Veres Ferrer, 2006. "Diseño de un índice para la medicion del desarrollo humano/Design of an human development index," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 24, pages 1013-1042, Diciembre.
    2. Casado, José María & Gracia, Azucena, 2005. "An Assessment of the Luxembourg Agreement on the Spanish Agricultural Sector: an Econometric Model," 89th Seminar, February 2-5, 2005, Parma, Italy 232589, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. Gracia, Azucena & de Magistris, Tiziana & Casado, Jose Maria, 2008. "The Effect Of The New Single Farm Payment In Irrigated Agriculture: The Case Of Spain," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6590, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Abler, David G., 2006. "Approaches to Measuring the Effects of Trade Agreements," Commissioned Papers 140762, Canadian Agricultural Trade Policy Research Network.
    5. Hirad, Hagi & Nelson, Rohan & Andrews, Neil & Shaw, Ian, 2003. "Comparing the effects of different approaches to liberalising world grains markets," 2003 Conference (47th), February 12-14, 2003, Fremantle, Australia 57892, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    6. Yoonkyo Cho & Taehwan Kim & Jaewhak Roh, 2021. "An analysis of the effects of electronic commerce on the Korean economy using the CGE model," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 831-854, September.
    7. Shinoj Parappurathu & Anjani Kumar & Shiv Kumar & Rajni Jain, 2014. "A Partial Equilibrium Model for Future Outlooks on Major Cereals in India," Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, National Council of Applied Economic Research, vol. 8(2), pages 155-192, May.
    8. Ewa Kiryluk-Dryjska & Agnieszka Baer-Nawrocka, 2021. "Regional Differences in Benefits from the EU Common Agricultural Policy in Poland and Their Policy Implications," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Kamel Elouhichi & Maria Espinosa Goded & Pavel Ciaian & Angel Perni Llorente & Bouda Vosough Ahmadi & Liesbeth Colen & Sergio Gomez Y Paloma, 2018. "The EU-Wide Individual Farm Model for Common Agricultural Policy Analysis (IFM-CAP v.1): Economic Impacts of CAP Greening," JRC Research Reports JRC108693, Joint Research Centre.
    10. repec:ags:ijag24:347273 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. Scott Bradford & Alexandre Gohin, 2006. "Modeling Distribution Services and Assessing Their Welfare Effects in a General Equilibrium Framework," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(1), pages 87-102, February.
    12. Parappurathu, Shinoj & Kumar, Anjani & Kumar, Shiv & Jain, Rajni, 2014. "Commodity Outlook on Major Cereals in India," Policy Papers 344972, ICAR National Institute of Agricultural Economics and Policy Research (NIAP).
    13. Majewski, Edward & Malak-Rawlikowska, Agata & Gebska, Monkia & Hamulczuk, Mariusz & Harvey, David R., 2012. "Cost-Effectiveness Assesment Of Improving Animal Welfare Standards In European Agriculture," 2012 Conference, August 18-24, 2012, Foz do Iguacu, Brazil 126741, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Oyewumi, Olubukola Ayodeju, 2005. "Modeling tariff rate quotas in the South African livestock industry," Master's Degree Theses 28064, University of the Free State, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    15. Duch-Carvallo, Teresa & Malaga, Jaime E., 2009. "International sorghum trade: United States beyond the Mexican dependency?," 2009 Annual Meeting, January 31-February 3, 2009, Atlanta, Georgia 46862, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    16. Nigel Key & Gregoire Tallard, 2012. "Mitigating methane emissions from livestock: a global analysis of sectoral policies," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 112(2), pages 387-414, May.
    17. Mariusz Hamulczuk & Katarzyna Hertel, 2009. "Implications of the Abolition of Milk Quota System for Polish Agriculture – Simulation Results Based on the AG MEMOD Model," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 3(3), September.
    18. de Muro, Pasquale & Salvatici, Luca, 2001. "The Common Agricultural Policy In Multisectoral Models," Working Papers 14804, National Institute of Agricultural Economics, Italy - INEA, Osservatorio Sulle Politiche Agricole dell'UE.
    19. Gebrehiwet, Y. & Meyer, F. & Kirsten, J.F., 2011. "Integrating agricultural input expenditure into a partial equilibrium model of the South African agricultural sector," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 50(2), September.
    20. Catherine Benjamin & Magalie Houée Bigot, 2006. "The impact on yields of arable crops of moving from price support to area payements: A Study of the 1992 CAP Reform: n° 423," Post-Print hal-01931561, HAL.
    21. Baer-Nawrocka, Agnieszka & Kiryluk-Dryjska, Ewa, 2010. "Wpływ Likwidacji Kwot Mlecznych Na Sytuację Produkcyjną I Ekonomiczną Producentów Mleka W Unii Europejskiej (Wyniki Symulacji Modelowych)," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 3(148).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae06:25709. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.