IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/gewi11/114486.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Entwicklungspotenziale für Forstbetriebsgemeinschaften - Ergebnisse einer institutionsökonomischen Analyse

Author

Listed:
  • Harsche, Johannes
  • Jaensch, Kerstin
  • Krokel, Karin

Abstract

In dem vorliegenden Beitrag werden am Beispiel des Landes Hessen die Entwicklungsperspektiven von Forstbetriebsgemeinschaften aufgezeigt. Die strukturelle Bedeutung derartiger Zusammenschlüsse für die hessische Forstwirtschaft ist auch daraus ersichtlich, dass gegenwärtig etwa die Hälfte der hessischen Waldfläche auf forstwirtschaftliche Zusammenschlüsse entfällt. In einem ersten Untersuchungsschritt werden anhand von theoretischen Überlegungen aus der Institutionenökonomie Optionen für die zukünftige Ausrichtung der Forstbetriebsgemeinschaften beleuchtet. In einem zweiten Untersuchungsschritt erfolgt die qualitative Auswertung von 19 leitfadengestützten Expertengesprächen mit Vertretern der Forst- und Holzwirtschaft. Die Untersuchungsergebnisse weisen darauf hin, dass die hessischen Forstbetriebsgemeinschaften mit zahlreichen strukturellen Problemen konfrontiert sind und im Hinblick auf eine stärker unternehmerisch ausgerichtete Geschäftstätigkeit voraussichtlich noch einen beschwerlichen Weg vor sich haben. In this paper, with regard to the forest sector of the German State of Hesse, the corporate governance of forestry cooperatives is argued. The structural relevance of our research topic is obvious because of the fact that in the State of Hesse nearly the half of forest area is used by such cooperatives. In order to derive some future perspectives for the management of forestry cooperatives, in a first step, some considerations of institutional economics are presented. Second, in a qualitative analysis the results from 19 interviews with experts of the forestry sector are explored. Our results show that, obviously, the forestry cooperatives face many heavy structural problems.

Suggested Citation

  • Harsche, Johannes & Jaensch, Kerstin & Krokel, Karin, 2011. "Entwicklungspotenziale für Forstbetriebsgemeinschaften - Ergebnisse einer institutionsökonomischen Analyse," 51st Annual Conference, Halle, Germany, September 28-30, 2011 114486, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:gewi11:114486
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.114486
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/114486/files/harsche.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.114486?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simon, Donald M. & Scoville, Orlin J., 1982. "Forestry Cooperatives: Organization and Performance," Research Reports 52031, United States Department of Agriculture, Rural Development.
    2. Borgen, Svein Ole, 2004. "Rethinking incentive problems in cooperative organizations," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 33(4), pages 383-393, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Borgen, Svein Ole, 2011. "Product differentiation and cooperative governance," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 327-333, May.
    2. Golec Maria Magdalena & Płuciennik Piotr, 2017. "Polish cooperative banks as net lenders in the money market," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 13(4), pages 27-36, December.
    3. John E. Hatcher & Thomas J. Straka & John L. Greene, 2013. "The Size of Forest Holding/Parcelization Problem in Forestry: A Literature Review," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2012. "Property Rights Problems in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Heterodox Institutionalist Perspective," Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, Journal of International Agricultural Trade and Development, vol. 61(3).
    5. Dionisio Ortiz-Miranda & Olga M Moreno-Pérez & Ana M Moragues-Faus, 2010. "Innovative Strategies of Agricultural Cooperatives in the Framework of the New Rural Development Paradigms: The Case of the Region of Valencia (Spain)," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 42(3), pages 661-677, March.
    6. Hakelius, Karin & Hansson, Helena, 2016. "Members’ attitudes towards cooperatives and their perception of agency problems," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 19(4), October.
    7. Jakša Krišto & Antti Talonen & Hrvoje Pauković, 2021. "Analysis of community‐owned mutual insurers' prospects of development in CEE countries: Outlining research agenda," Risk Management and Insurance Review, American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 24(3), pages 243-261, September.
    8. Justine Valette & Paul Amadieu & Patrick Sentis, 2018. "Les coopératives résistent-elles mieux ? Une analyse de survie des coopératives agricoles françaises," Post-Print hal-01990418, HAL.
    9. Valentinov, Vladislav & Iliopoulos, Constantine, 2012. "Property Rights Problems in Agricultural Cooperatives: A Heterodox Institutionalist Perspective," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 61(03), pages 1-9, August.
    10. Matteo Cotugno & Antonio D'Amato & Angela Gallo & Valeria Stefanelli, 2021. "Do supervisory enforcement actions affect board composition?," Corporate Governance: An International Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 22-44, January.
    11. Dietl, Helmut M. & Franck, Egon & Hasan, Tariq & Lang, Markus, 2009. "Governance of professional sports leagues--Cooperatives versus contracts," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 127-137, June.
    12. Grashuis, Jasper & Cook, Michael, 2016. "Capital, Ownership, and Governance: Analyzing the Structure of U.S. Farmer Cooperatives," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235677, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Kontolaimou, Alexandra & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2010. "Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(8), pages 1946-1957, August.
    14. Amiquero, K. (Katty) Sanchez & Wubben, E.F.M. (Emiel) & van Dam, Y.K. (Ynte) & Trienekens, J.H. (Jacques), 2023. "Success and failure factors in agricultural cooperatives," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 14(01), January.
    15. Olesen, Henrik Ballebye, 2005. "The Horizon Problem Reconsidered," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24489, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    16. Harsche, J. & Jaensch, K. & Krökel, K., 2012. "Entwicklungspotenziale Für Forstbetriebs- Gemeinschaften – Ergebnisse Einer Institutionsökonomischen Analyse," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 47, March.
    17. Ton, Giel & Vellema, Sietze & DeRuyterDeWildt, Marieke, 2011. "Credible evidence on complex change processes: key challenges in impact evaluation on agricultural value chains," MPRA Paper 32027, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Harold Paredes-Frigolett & Pablo Nachar-Calderón & Carmen Marcuello, 2017. "Modeling the governance of cooperative firms," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 23(1), pages 122-166, March.
    19. Walter Perpétuo Ribas & Bruno Pedroso & Leandro Martinez Vargas & Claudia Tania Picinin & Miguel Archanjo de Freitas Júnior, 2022. "Cooperative Organization and Its Characteristics in Economic and Social Development (1995 to 2020)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Yuling Gao & Zuhui Huang & Qiao Liang, 2018. "Service Realization And Determinants In Agricultural Cooperatives In China: Evidence From Zhejiang, Sichuan And Heilongjiang Provinces," The Singapore Economic Review (SER), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 63(05), pages 1205-1225, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Land Economics/Use;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:gewi11:114486. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gewisea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.