IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae05/24695.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Social Capital on Agricultural Income Among Corporate Farms in the Czech Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Wolz, Axel
  • Fritzsch, Jana
  • Reinsberg, Klaus

Abstract

In the Czech Republic, agricultural production is still dominated by corporate farms. However, not all of them had been equally successful, economically. In general, a varying adoption of production factors is identified as being of influence. Whether their ability to collaborate with other farms is an additional factor which has been discussed under the concept of social capital since quite some time will be analysed in this paper. Based on the findings of a survey among a sample of 166 corporate farms by adopting factor and multiple regression analysis it can be deduced that social capital is indeed a significant factor determining the level of agricultural income.

Suggested Citation

  • Wolz, Axel & Fritzsch, Jana & Reinsberg, Klaus, 2005. "The Impact of Social Capital on Agricultural Income Among Corporate Farms in the Czech Republic," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24695, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae05:24695
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24695
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24695/files/cp05wo01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24695?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rozelle, Scott & Swinnen, Johan F.M., 2000. "Transition And Agriculture," Working Papers 11948, University of California, Davis, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wolz, Axel & Fritzsch, Jana & Pencakova, Jitka, 2006. "Social Capital Among Agricultural Producers In The Czech Republic: Its Impact On Economic Performance," IAMO Discussion Papers 91965, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    2. Wolz, Axel & Fritzsch, Jana & Pencáková, Jitka, 2006. "The impact of structural social capital on farm income in the Czech Republic," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 52(6), pages 281-288.
    3. Milah Zainal & Siti Raba’ah Hamzah & Rosmiza M. Z., 2020. "The Role of Social Assets on Community Well-Being in Urban Farming Project," Journal of Asian Scientific Research, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(4), pages 255-263, December.
    4. repec:zbw:iamodp:91965 is not listed on IDEAS

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bojnec, Štefan, 2011. "Agricultural and Rural Labour Markets in the EU Candidate Countries of Croatia, Former Yugoslav of Macedonia and Turkey," Factor Markets Working Papers 102, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    2. Anderson, Kym & Huang, Jikun & Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Will China's WTO accession worsen farm household incomes?," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 443-456.
    3. Tao Xiang & Jikun Huang & d’Artis Kancs & Scott Rozelle & Jo Swinnen, 2012. "Food Standards and Welfare: General Equilibrium Effects," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 223-244, June.
    4. Stamoulis, Kostas G. & Pingali, Prabhu L. & Reardon, Thomas, 2006. "Impacts of Agrifood Market Transformation during Globalization on the Poor's Rural Nonfarm Employment: Lessons for Rural Business Development Programs," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25556, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Bhaumik, Sumon K. & Dimova, Ralitza & Nugent, Jeffrey B., 2006. "Pulls, Pushes and Entitlement Failures in Labor Markets: Does the State of Development Matter?," IZA Discussion Papers 2258, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    6. Raffaella Castagnini & Klaus Deininger & Maria A. Gonzalez, 2004. "Comparing land reform and land markets in colombia: impacts on equity and efficiency," Policy Research Working Paper Series 3258, The World Bank.
    7. Deininger, Klaus & Songqing Jin, 2002. "Land rental markets as an alternative to government reallocation? equity and efficiency considerations in the Chinese land tenure system," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2930, The World Bank.
    8. Bojnec, Štefan, 2011. "Land Markets in the EU Candidate Countries of Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey," Factor Markets Working Papers 96, Centre for European Policy Studies.
    9. Alan Matthews, 2001. "The Possible Impact of China's WTO Membership on the WTO Agricultural Negotiations," CEG Working Papers 200110, Trinity College Dublin, Department of Economics.
    10. Wusheng Yu & Søren E. Frandsen, 2005. "China's WTO Commitments in Agriculture and Impacts of Potential OECD Agricultural Trade Liberalizations," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 19(1), pages 1-28, March.
    11. Malcolm Dowling & Ganeshan Wignaraja, 2006. "Central Asia’s Transition After Fifteen Years : Growth and Policy Choices," Macroeconomics Working Papers 22416, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    12. repec:lic:licosd:26310 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Csaki, Csaba, 2008. "A Joint IAE- EAE Seminar Agricultural Economics and Transition: “What was expected, observed, and learned.”," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 108, pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae05:24695. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.