IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae02/24956.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Evolution of the Agri-Environmental Policies and Sustainable Agriculture

Author

Listed:
  • Ventura-Lucas, Maria Raquel
  • Godinho, Maria de Lurdes Ferro
  • Fragoso, Rui Manuel de Sousa

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture implies the exploitation of natural resources now, without compromising the natural resources stocks for the future generations. In the context of the paper, agricultural sustainability takes place at the interface between agriculture and the environment. The focus is on the interplay between farming systems and agri-environmental policies. Agricultural policies have major impacts on soil and water quality and on bio-diversity. Support commodity price policies have lead to serious problems of water pollution; high levels of soil erosion; nitrate losses and lost of biodiversity. The semi decoupeted income support policies and the introduction of the agri-environmental schemes under the 1992 CAP reform were the first attempts to correct the negative aspects of the production-orientated policies. For the first time farmers were regarded as countryside and landscape keepers and as environmental conservationists. Under the 2000 Agenda similar emphasis was given to the sustainability of agriculture. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the impact of the different agri-environmental policies on typical farming systems and consequently their effects on water pollution, soil erosion and bio-diversity/landscape. A bio-economic model, integrating a mathematical programming model and crop growth simulation model, is applied to estimated the changes in the levels of nitrogen leaching and soil erosion, and in the degree of bio-diversity under the current and proposed agricultural policy scenarios. The following farming systems are studied: dryland cereal farming systems (intensive and extensive), livestock and irrigated farming systems using conventional and conservation farming technologies. The results show The results show that the main changes on water pollution, soil erosion levels and biodiversity are mainly due to changes in price and arable compensatory payments. The agri-environmental measures are more important as farm income source than as a policy instrument to influence environmental parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Ventura-Lucas, Maria Raquel & Godinho, Maria de Lurdes Ferro & Fragoso, Rui Manuel de Sousa, 2002. "The Evolution of the Agri-Environmental Policies and Sustainable Agriculture," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24956, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae02:24956
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.24956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/24956/files/cp02lu01.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.24956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deybe, D., 1998. "Can agricultural sector models be a tool for policy analysis? An application for the case of Burkina Faso," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 58(3), pages 367-380, November.
    2. John A. Miranowski, 1984. "Impacts of Productivity Loss on Crop Production and Management in a Dynamic Economic Model," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 66(1), pages 61-71.
    3. Miranowski, John, 1984. "Impacts of Productivity Loss on Crop Production and Management in a Dynamic Economic Model," Staff General Research Papers Archive 10708, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    4. Marc O. Ribaudo & C. Tim Osborn & Kazim Konyar, 1994. "Land Retirement as a Tool for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 70(1), pages 77-87.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rui Fragoso & Vladimir Bushenkov & Carlos Marques, 2009. "Water Allocation Among Multiple Uses Using Interactive Decision Maps," CEFAGE-UE Working Papers 2009_14, University of Evora, CEFAGE-UE (Portugal).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ekbom, Anders & Brown, Gardner M. & Sterner, Thomas, 2009. "Muddy Waters: Soil Erosion and Downstream Externalities," Working Papers in Economics 341, University of Gothenburg, Department of Economics.
    2. Renan Goetz & David Zilberman, 1995. "Mining the soil: Agricultural production system on peatland," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 6(2), pages 119-138, September.
    3. Babcock, Bruce A. & Secchi, Silvia, 1999. "Managing Pest Resistance: The Potential Of Crop Rotations And Shredding," 1999 Annual meeting, August 8-11, Nashville, TN 21597, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    4. Goetz, Renan, 1995. "Diversification and Sustainable Agricultural Production-The Case of Soil Erosion," CUDARE Working Papers 201477, University of California, Berkeley, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    5. Smith, Elwin G. & Lerohl, Mel L. & Messele, Teklay, 1999. "Optimum Soil Quality Attribute Levels And Values," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35697, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    6. Hertzler, Greg & Barton, John, 1992. "Dynamic Model of Dryland Salinity Abatement," Discussion Papers 232285, University of Western Australia, School of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    7. Martin, William E. & Seitz, Wesley D., 1991. "The Search for an Optimal U.S. Agricultural Water Quality Policy," 1991 Annual Meeting, August 4-7, Manhattan, Kansas 271213, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    8. J. Salerian, 1989. "Application of an Economic Model to Dryland Soil Salinity in Western Australia," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 89-25, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    9. Paudel, Krishna P. & Lohr, Luanne, 1998. "Dynamic Analysis Of A Residue Management System In Cotton," 1998 Annual meeting, August 2-5, Salt Lake City, UT 20794, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    10. Gary R. Vieth & Herath Gunatilake & Linda J. Cox, 2001. "Economics of Soil Conservation: The Upper Mahaweli Watershed of Sir Lanka," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 139-152, January.
    11. Paudel, Krishna P. & Lohr, Luanne, 1998. "Dynamic Economic Analysis Of A Residue Management System In Cotton," Faculty Series 16677, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
    12. Passmore, J.G. & Brown, Colin G., 1991. "Analysis Of Rangeland Degradation Using Stochastic Dynamic Programming," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 35(2), pages 1-27, August.
    13. Smith, Elwin G. & Lerohl, Mel L. & Messele, Teklay & Janzen, H. Henry, 2000. "Soil Quality Attribute Time Paths: Optimal Levels And Values," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, July.
    14. Hendricks, Nathan P. & Sinnathamby, Sumathy & Douglas-Mankin, Kyle & Smith, Aaron & Sumner, Daniel A. & Earnhart, Dietrich H., 2014. "The environmental effects of crop price increases: Nitrogen losses in the U.S. Corn Belt," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 507-526.
    15. Ananda, Jayanath & Herath, Gamini & Chisholm, Anthony H., 2001. "Determination of yield and erosion damage functions using subjectively elicited data: application to smallholder tea in Sri Lanka," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 45(2), pages 1-15.
    16. Xie, Hualin & Wang, Wei & Zhang, Xinmin, 2018. "Evolutionary game and simulation of management strategies of fallow cultivated land: A case study in Hunan province, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 86-97.
    17. Powell, Mark R. & Wilson, James D., 1997. "Risk Assessment for National Natural Resource Conservation Programs," Discussion Papers 10859, Resources for the Future.
    18. Banerjee, Onil & Crossman, Neville & Vargas, Renato & Brander, Luke & Verburg, Peter & Cicowiez, Martin & Hauck, Jennifer & McKenzie, Emily, 2020. "Global socio-economic impacts of changes in natural capital and ecosystem services: State of play and new modeling approaches," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    19. Laborte, Alice G. & Van Ittersum, Martin K. & Van den Berg, Marrit M., 2007. "Multi-scale analysis of agricultural development: A modelling approach for Ilocos Norte, Philippines," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 862-873, June.
    20. Lu, Hua & Xie, Hualin & Lv, Tiangui & Yao, Guanrong, 2019. "Determinants of cultivated land recuperation in ecologically damaged areas in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 160-166.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Environmental Economics and Policy;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae02:24956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.