IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaa107/6447.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

MID TERM EVALUATION OF RDPs IN ITALY: COMPARING MODELS

Author

Listed:
  • Fucilli, Vincenzo
  • De Blasi, Giuseppe
  • Acciani, Claudio

Abstract

With the reforms of Structural Funds there has been a considerable tightening of the guiding principles of Community actions. Among these, a primary role has been given to evaluation. In this context, the paper deals with what has been realized for the evaluation of rural development policy, comparing various experiences in Italy with reference to the Rural Development Plans. The aim is to verify, on the basis of (meta) criteria, the methodological contents of the mid term evaluation reports of 14 RDPs in the centre-north of Italy. Through the analyses and the comparisons of these reports, the paper is an attempt to reconstruct the “quality” of the evaluations with specific reference to the methodological aspects, the models and the procedures adopted by the evaluators.

Suggested Citation

  • Fucilli, Vincenzo & De Blasi, Giuseppe & Acciani, Claudio, 2008. "MID TERM EVALUATION OF RDPs IN ITALY: COMPARING MODELS," 107th Seminar, January 30-February 1, 2008, Sevilla, Spain 6447, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaa107:6447
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.6447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/6447/files/pp08fu20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.6447?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bartolini, Fabio & Finn, J. & Kurz, Isabelle & Samoggia, Antonella & Viaggi, Davide, 2005. "Using Information from Mid Term Evaluations of RDP for the Multicriteria Analysis of Agri-environmental Schemes," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24738, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Peter Midmore, 1998. "Rural Policy Reform and Local Development Programmes: Appropriate Evaluation Procedures," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 49(3), pages 409-426, September.
    3. Lion, Cristina & Martini, Paola, 2006. "The evaluation of a Complex Social Program: Lessons learned from the experience of the European Social Fund," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 1-9, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Navarro Francisco & Labianca Marilena & Cejudo Eugenio & de Rubertis Stefano & Salento Angelo & Maroto Juan Carlos & Belliggiano Angelo, 2018. "Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 10(1), pages 107-126, March.
    2. Yves Léon & . Agricultural Economics Society, 2003. "The evolving role of agricultural economists in policy-related research in the rural economy," Post-Print hal-01931645, HAL.
    3. Pablo Vidueira & José M. Díaz-Puente & María Rivera, 2014. "Socioeconomic Impact Assessment in Ex Ante Evaluations," Evaluation Review, , vol. 38(4), pages 309-335, August.
    4. Thomson, Kenneth J. & Psaltopoulos, Demetrios, 2007. "General Equilibrium Analysis of the Spatial Impacts of Rural Policy," 103rd Seminar, April 23-25, 2007, Barcelona, Spain 9402, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    5. Peter Midmore & Dennis Thomas, 2006. "Regional Self-reliance and Economic Development: The Pembrokeshire Case," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 21(4), pages 391-408, November.
    6. Dwyer, Janet & Clark, Mike & Kirwan, James & Kambites, Carol & Lewis, Nick & Molnarova, Anna & Thompson, Ken & Mantino, Francesco & Tarangioli, Serena & Monteleone, Alessandro & Bolli, Martina & Fagia, 2008. "Review of Rural Development Instruments: DG Agri project 2006-G4-10. Final Report," MPRA Paper 50290, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Marlan Hutahaean & Johnson Pasaribu, 2020. "Development from Outskirts: Analysis of Budgeting for Village Funds in Indonesia," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(4), pages 197-203.
    8. Jenkins, T. N., 2000. "Putting postmodernity into practice: endogenous development and the role of traditional cultures in the rural development of marginal regions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 301-313, September.
    9. Häring, Anna Maria & Vairo, Daniela & Dabbert, Stephan & Zanoli, Raffaele, 2009. "Organic farming policy development in the EU: What can multi-stakeholder processes contribute?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 265-272, June.
    10. Aza, A. & Riccioli, F. & Di Iacovo, F., 2021. "Optimising payment for environmental services schemes by integrating strategies: The case of the Atlantic Forest, Brazil," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    11. Jianwu Qi & Wei Li & Zongxiang Wang & Haozhou Fang, 2021. "Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-26, September.
    12. Chmieliński, Paweł & Faccilongo, Nicola & Fiore, Mariantonietta & La Sala, Piermichele, 2018. "Design and implementation of the Local Development Strategy: a case study of Polish and Italian Local Action Groups in 2007-2013," Studies in Agricultural Economics, Research Institute for Agricultural Economics, vol. 120(1), April.
    13. Gramzow, Andreas, 2009. "Rural development as provision of local public goods: Theory and evidence from Poland," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 51, number 92313.
    14. Gillian Bristow & John Farrington & Jon Shaw & Tim Richardson, 2009. "Developing an Evaluation for Crosscutting Policy Goals: The Accessibility Policy Assessment Tool," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(1), pages 48-62, January.
    15. Cunico, Giovanni & Aivazidou, Eirini & Mollona, Edoardo, 2021. "Beyond financial proxies in Cohesion Policy inputs’ monitoring: A system dynamics approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaa107:6447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.