IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcp15/344257.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Investigating the coexistence of psychological drivers and deterrents of consumer acceptance of cultured meat hamburger patties

Author

Listed:
  • Tsvakirai, Chiedza Zvirurami
  • Nalley, Lawton Lanier

Abstract

Consumers’ willingness to contribute to the development of sustainable food systems has led to a growth in the use of faux meat in producing hamburger patties. This study investigates whether consumers’ explicit and implicit perceptions of cultured meat will assist in encouraging the acceptance of cultured meat in this market. We measured consumers’ perceptions using opinion statements and the level of agreement was ranked on a Likert scale. Composite indices were extracted from this data and these were regressed against consumers’ willingness to try cultured meat burger patties. The study found that the implicit perceptions (worldviews) promoted both neophobic and neophilic attitudes while explicit (product-specific) perceptions indicated that consumers’ rejection may be driven by concerns of anticipated social, cultural and economic disruptions. The study’s results suggest tactful marketing approaches that can utilise implicit perceptions to promote consumer acceptance. Other results indicated the areas of concern that should be addressed to facilitate acceptance and the population groups that could be targeted as early adopters.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsvakirai, Chiedza Zvirurami & Nalley, Lawton Lanier, 2024. "Investigating the coexistence of psychological drivers and deterrents of consumer acceptance of cultured meat hamburger patties," IAAE 2024 Conference, August 2-7, 2024, New Delhi, India 344257, International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE).
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:344257
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.344257
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/344257/files/20389.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.344257?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rashmit S. Arora & Daniel A. Brent & Edward C. Jaenicke, 2020. "Is India Ready for Alt-Meat? Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Meat Alternatives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Filipe Quevedo-Silva & Jéssica Beatriz Pereira, 2022. "Factors Affecting Consumers’ Cultivated Meat Purchase Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nan Hua & Randall Shannon & Murtaza Haider & George P. Moschis, 2023. "Factors Influencing Purchase Intention of Food Surplus through a Food-Sharing Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    2. Asioli, Daniele & Fuentes-Pila, Joaquìn & Alarcón, Silverio & Han, Jia & Liu, Jingjing & Hocquette, Jean-Francois & Nayga, Rodolfo M., 2022. "Consumers’ valuation of cultured beef Burger: A Multi-Country investigation using choice experiments," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    3. Jihee Hwang & Jihye You & Junghoon Moon & Jaeseok Jeong, 2020. "Factors Affecting Consumers’ Alternative Meats Buying Intentions: Plant-Based Meat Alternative and Cultured Meat," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Michelle S. Segovia & No‐Ya Yu & Ellen J. Van Loo, 2023. "The effect of information nudges on online purchases of meat alternatives," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 45(1), pages 106-127, March.
    5. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2022. "Sustainable food: Can information from food labels make consumers switch to meat substitutes?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    6. Ebad Allah Jahanabadi & Seyed Nematolla Mousavi & Mohammad Hashem Moosavihaghighi & Mohammad Reza Eslami, 2024. "Consumers’ willingness to pay for antibiotic-free chicken meat: application of contingent valuation method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(10), pages 25151-25172, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agribusiness; Food Consumption/Nutrition/Food Safety; Institutional and Behavioral Economics; Marketing;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp15:344257. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://iaae-agecon.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.