IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aerirs/29092.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Cap Mid Term Review And The Wto Doha Round; Analyses For The Netherlands, Eu And Accession Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Lips, Markus

Abstract

This report analyses the potential impact of the EU CAP reforms that follow the Mid Term Review and the Harbinson Proposal for negotiation modalities in the WTO Doha Round on the Netherlands, EU14 and the accession countries. In welfare terms, the MTR has a rela-tively small impact on the Netherlands, the other member countries of the EU as well as the accession countries, while agricultural income decreases add up to around 2, 3 and 5 percent respectively. Under the Harbinson Proposal the Netherlands and the other EU member countries face losses of their agricultural incomes of 8 and 10 percent respec-tively, mainly due to reduced outputs in the cereals, oilseeds, and cattle sectors. The agricultural income in the accession countries is also decreasing. As a conclusion, the MTR does not make the European Agriculture compatible for the WTO Doha Round. The border protection measures, which are hardly affected in the MTR, still play a mayor role. Assumptions about the effects of decoupling and the difference between applied and bound tariff rates influence model results.

Suggested Citation

  • Lips, Markus, 2004. "The Cap Mid Term Review And The Wto Doha Round; Analyses For The Netherlands, Eu And Accession Countries," Report Series 29092, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aerirs:29092
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29092
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/29092/files/pr040603.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.29092?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Walkenhorst & Nora Dihel, 2003. "Tariff Bindings, Unused Protection and Agricultural Trade Liberalisation," OECD Economic Studies, OECD Publishing, vol. 2003(1), pages 231-249.
    2. Kleinhanß, Werner & Manegold, Dirk & Bertelsmeier, Marcus & Deeken, Eva & Giffhorn, Elgin & Jägersberg, Petra & Offermann, Frank & Osterburg, Bernhard & Salamon, Petra, 2001. "Mögliche Auswirkungen eines Ausstiegs aus der Milchquotenregelung für die deutsche Landwirtschaft," Arbeitsberichte aus der vTI-Agrarökonomie 05/2001, Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute, Federal Research Institute for Rural Areas, Forestry and Fisheries.
    3. Hans van Meijl & Frank van Tongeren, 2002. "The Agenda 2000 CAP reform, world prices and GATT--WTO export constraints," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 29(4), pages 445-470, December.
    4. Joseph Francois, 2002. "Formulas for Success? Some Options for Market Access Negotiations," International Trade 0210001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Hertel, Thomas, 1997. "Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and applications," GTAP Books, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, number 7685, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mack, G. & Schaak, D. & Mann, S., 2006. "Die Schweiz in der EU? Modellberechnungen zu den Konsequenzen einer Mitgliedschaft für den Schweizerischen Agrarsektor," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 41, March.
    2. Buysse, Jeroen & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2005. "Impact of Alternative Implementations of the Agenda 2000 Mid Term Review," 2005 International Congress, August 23-27, 2005, Copenhagen, Denmark 24589, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    3. van Berkum, Siemen & Roza, Pim, 2006. "The EU at the world market; An impact assessment of the Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture," Report Series 29096, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    4. Bchir, Mohamed Hedi & Hammouda, Hakim Ben, 2008. "Does theory matters in Global CGE models," Conference papers 331807, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Achterbosch, Thom J. & Ben Hammouda, H. & Osakwe, Patrick N. & van Tongeren, Frank W., 2004. "Trade Liberalisation Under The Doha Development Agenda; Options And Consequences For Africa," Report Series 29104, Wageningen University and Research Center, Agricultural Economics Research Institute.
    2. Parsons, Christopher R. & Skeldon, Ronald & Walmsley, Terrie L. & Winters, L. Alan, 2005. "Quantifying the International Bilateral Movements of Migrants," Conference papers 331402, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    3. Antimiani, Alessandro & Conforti, Piero & Salvatici, Luca, 2005. "Alternative Market Access Scenarios in the Agriculture Trade Negotiations of the Doha Round," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23.
    4. Antimiani, Alessandro & Conforti, Piero & Salvatici, Luca, 2006. "Assessing Market Access: Do Developing Countries Really Get a Preferential Treatment?," Working Papers 18870, TRADEAG - Agricultural Trade Agreements.
    5. van Meijl, Hans & van Tongeren, Frank, 2002. "International Diffusion of Gains from Biotechnology and the European Union’s Common Agricultural Policy," Conference papers 331038, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    6. Meijl, Hans van & Tongeren, Frank van, 2004. "International diffusion of gains from biotechnology and the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 31(2-3), pages 307-316, December.
    7. Binfield, Julian & Meyers, William & Westhoff, Patrick, 2005. "Modelling CAP Reform: Consensus or Conflict?," Conference papers 331431, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Brockmeier, Martina & Pelikan, Janine, 2006. "Agricultural Market Access: A Moving Target in the WTO Negotiations?," 2006 Annual Meeting, August 12-18, 2006, Queensland, Australia 25428, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    9. Tabeau, Andrzej, 2009. "Influence of macro-economic growth, CAP reforms and biofuel policy on the Polish agri-food sector in 2007–2020," Problems of World Agriculture / Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, vol. 6(21), pages 1-10, March.
    10. Conforti, Piero & Velazquez, Beatriz E., 2004. "The Effects of Alternative Proposals for Agricultural Export Subsidies in the Current WTO Round," Estey Centre Journal of International Law and Trade Policy, Estey Centre for Law and Economics in International Trade, vol. 5(1), pages 1-26.
    11. Kawasaki, Kenichi, 2004. "The Impact of Free Trade Agreements in Asia," Conference papers 331231, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    12. Martina Brockmeier & Janine Pelikan, 2006. "Agricultural Market Access: A Moving Target in the WTO Negotiations?," The Institute for International Integration Studies Discussion Paper Series iiisdp125, IIIS.
    13. Tabeau, Andrzej A. & van Meijl, Hans & Banse, Martin & Woltjer, Geert B., 2008. "Agricultural Incomes Development in EU till 2030: Scenario Analysis of Main Driving Factors," 108th Seminar, February 8-9, 2008, Warsaw, Poland 48115, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Martina Brockmeier & Marianne Kurzweil & Janine Pelikan, 2006. "Agricultural Market Access: Striking the Balance between Formulas and Water in the Tariffs," ENARPRI Working Papers 018, ENARPRI (European Network of Agricultural and Rural Policy Research Institutes).
    15. Mavisakalyan, Astghik, 2005. "How Much Do Institutions Matter for Trade? Evidence from Transition Countries," Conference papers 331321, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Simon J.Evenett & Mia Mikic & Ravi Ratnayake (ed.), 2011. "Trade-led growth: A sound strategy for Asia," ARTNeT Books and Research Reports, United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP), number brr10.
    17. Ianchovichina, Elena, 2004. "Trade policy analysis in the presence of duty drawbacks," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 353-371, April.
    18. Pierre Boulanger & Hasan Dudu & Emanuele Ferrari & George Philippidis, 2016. "Russian Roulette at the Trade Table: A Specific Factors CGE Analysis of an Agri-food Import Ban," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 67(2), pages 272-291, June.
    19. Jiang, Tingsong, 2003. "The Impact of China's WTO Accession on its Regional Economies," Australasian Agribusiness Review, University of Melbourne, Department of Agriculture and Food Systems, vol. 11.
    20. Knut Einar Rosendahl & Jon Strand, 2011. "Carbon Leakage from the Clean Development Mechanism," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 4), pages 27-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    International Relations/Trade;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aerirs:29092. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ledlonl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.