IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea84/279041.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Implications Of Electronic Trading For Agricultural Prices

Author

Listed:
  • Schrader, Lee F.

Abstract

Electronic trading is expected to result in net prices which are more favorable to producer sellers and/or buyers of agricultural products than those generated in traditional trading systems. Lower transaction costs and reduction of market power imbalances account for the difference in net prices. Review of the evidence from actual electronic trading supports these hypotheses. The importance of balanced information availability and effective loss of power by one side of the market due to electronic trading suggests that the move to greater use of such systems must come from agricultural producers.

Suggested Citation

  • Schrader, Lee F., 1984. "Implications Of Electronic Trading For Agricultural Prices," 1984 Annual Meeting, August 5-8, Ithaca, New York 279041, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea84:279041
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.279041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/279041/files/aaea-1984-097.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.279041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Helmreich, Dennis P. & Epperson, James E. & Huang, Chung-Liang, 1980. "The Value of Electronic Marketing Some Empirical Evidence," 1980 Annual Meeting, July 27-30, Urbana-Champaign, Illinois 278970, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. J. E. Epperson & M. H. So & S. M. Fletcher & D. H. Carley, 1988. "Profile analysis of market participants' attitudes toward selected market alternatives for US shelled peanuts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 4(5), pages 433-452.
    2. Czupryna Marcin & Oleksy Paweł, 2018. "The Effect of an Electronic Exchange on Prices and Return Volatility in the Fine Wine Market," Financial Internet Quarterly (formerly e-Finanse), Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 22-35, December.
    3. P. K. Kwakyi & J. E. Epperson & S. M. Fletcher & D. H. Carley, 1989. "Probit analysis of market participants' attitudes toward selected market alternatives for us farmers' stock peanuts," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 5(2), pages 107-119.
    4. Koontz, Stephen R. & Ward, Clement E., 1993. "Electronic Market Use By Oklahoma Lamb Producers," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 18(1), pages 1-16, July.
    5. Natanelov, Valeri & McKenzie, Andrew M. & Van Huylenbroeck, Guido, 2013. "Crude oil–corn–ethanol – nexus: A contextual approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 504-513.
    6. Turner, Steven C., 1987. "Rumblings from Communication Theory and A More Complete Evaluative Framework for Price Discovery Mechanisms," 1987 Annual Meeting, August 2-5, East Lansing, Michigan 269967, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea84:279041. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.