IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea79/277824.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Congestion In The Agricultural Marketing/Transportation System: A Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Paggi, Mechel
  • Fuller, Stephen

Abstract

This paper focuses on the problem of congestion in the agricultural marketing transportation system. The purpose of this study is to 1) examine methodology for evaluating the cost of congestion, 2) relate appropriate research techniques for modeling traffic-congested systems, and 3) carry out analysis of congestion arising in the truck-to-ship intermodal grain transfer system at the Port of Houston. A stochastic network simulation model was constructed to carry out the - queuing analysis. The case study reveals congestion cost to be substantial and congestion-reducing investment in labor and capital economically feasible. The approach presented is purposed as a guide for further research into congestion related problems in the agricultural marketing transportation system.

Suggested Citation

  • Paggi, Mechel & Fuller, Stephen, 1979. "Congestion In The Agricultural Marketing/Transportation System: A Case Study," 1979 Annual Meeting, July 29-August 1, Pullman, Washington 277824, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea79:277824
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277824
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277824/files/aaea-1979-038.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277824?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Herbert Mohring, 1961. "Land Values and the Measurement of Highway Benefits," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 69(3), pages 236-236.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lahr, Michael L. & Gibbs, Robert M., 2002. "Mobility of Section 8 families in Alameda County," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 187-213, September.
    2. Maria Börjesson & Jonas Eliasson, 2019. "Should values of time be differentiated?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 357-375, May.
    3. Gaston Tchang, 2016. "The impact of highway proximity on distribution centres’ rents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 53(13), pages 2834-2848, October.
    4. Andersson, Matts & Dehlin, Fredrik & Jörgensen, Peter & Pädam, Sirje, 2015. "Wider economic impacts of accessibility: a literature survey," Working papers in Transport Economics 2015:14, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    5. Gilles Duranton & Matthew A. Turner, 2011. "The Fundamental Law of Road Congestion: Evidence from US Cities," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 101(6), pages 2616-2652, October.
    6. Luca Zamparini & Aura Reggiani, 2007. "Meta-Analysis and the Value of Travel Time Savings: A Transatlantic Perspective in Passenger Transport," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 7(4), pages 377-396, December.
    7. Maurice Mongkuo & William Pammer, 1994. "The impact of targeted partnership grants on minority employment," The Review of Black Political Economy, Springer;National Economic Association, vol. 22(3), pages 19-29, March.
    8. Bell, Frederick W., 1969. "Benefit-Cost Analysis As Applied to Commercial Fisheries Programs," Working Papers 233018, United States Bureau of Commercial Fisheries, Division of Economic Research.
    9. P G Hartwick & J M Hartwick, 1972. "An Analysis of an Urban Thoroughfare," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 4(2), pages 193-204, June.
    10. Jianglin Lu & Keqiang Wang & Hongmei Liu, 2023. "Land Development Rights, Spatial Injustice, and the Economic Development in Net-Incremental Reduction Regions of Construction Land: Evidence from Shanghai, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    11. Gjestland, Arnstein & McArthur, David Philip & Osland, Liv & Thorsen, Inge, 2014. "The suitability of hedonic models for cost-benefit analysis: Evidence from commuting flows," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 136-151.
    12. Karima Kourtit & Peter Nijkamp & Roger R. Stough (ed.), 2015. "The Rise of the City," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15798.
    13. Roland N. McKean, 1973. "An Outsider Looks at Urban Economics," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 10(1), pages 19-37, February.
    14. Plaut, Pnina O & Deakin, Elizabeth, 2006. "Economic and Travel Impacts of Bypass Roads: A Comparative Study of Israel and the U.S," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt6711w6z7, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. J.M. Pogodzinski & David L. Sjoquist, 1993. "A Note On the Estimation of Capitalization," Public Finance Review, , vol. 21(4), pages 434-448, October.
    16. Allen, W. Bruce, 1987. "Value Capture in Transit," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 28(1).
    17. G Giuliano, 1989. "Research Policy and Review 27. New Directions for Understanding Transportation and Land Use," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 21(2), pages 145-159, February.
    18. Paul K. Asabere & Peter F. Colwell, 1985. "The Relative Lot Size Hypothesis: An Empirical Note," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 22(4), pages 355-357, August.
    19. Richard C. Porter, 1978. "The Economics of Congestion: A Geometric Review," Public Finance Review, , vol. 6(1), pages 23-52, January.
    20. Francisco Martínez & Claudio Araya, 2000. "Transport and Land-Use Benefits under Location Externalities," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 32(9), pages 1611-1624, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Public Economics;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea79:277824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.aaea.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.