IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlfba/180792.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Partizipation für eine gesundheitsfördernde Stadtentwicklung

In: Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte

Author

Listed:
  • Quilling, Eike
  • Köckler, Heike

Abstract

Partizipation wird in den letzten Jahren in vielen Zusammenhängen ein wachsender Stellenwert beigemessen. In zahlreichen Projekten der Gesundheitsförderung und der Stadtentwicklung zeigte sich, dass ein partizipativer Ansatz gewinnbringend für die Projektentwicklung und -umsetzung war. Der Begriff "Partizipation" wird jedoch in Gesundheitsförderung und Stadtentwicklung divergent eingesetzt. Während in der Gesundheitsförderung Partizipation als Ansatz zur Planung und Umsetzung von Interventionen und als Teil des Empowerments der Zielgruppe betrachtet wird, wird Partizipation in der Stadtentwicklung eher als Verfahrensbestandteil begriffen. Trotz der unterschiedlichen Verwendung des Begriffs ist die Förderung von mehr Partizipation ein gemeinsames Anliegen beider Disziplinen. Im Beitrag werden zwei hierfür zentrale Erfolgsfaktoren dargelegt: Institutionen, Multiplikatoren und Individuen zur Partizipation befähigen und gleichzeitig Machtstrukturen begegnen. Abschließend wird aufgezeigt, welche weiteren Rahmenbedingungen für die Umsetzung von Partizipation in der gesundheitsförderlichen Stadtentwicklung erforderlich sind.

Suggested Citation

  • Quilling, Eike & Köckler, Heike, 2018. "Partizipation für eine gesundheitsfördernde Stadtentwicklung," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Baumgart, Sabine & Köckler, Heike & Ritzinger, Anne & Rüdiger, Andrea (ed.), Planung für gesundheitsfördernde Städte, volume 8, pages 101-117, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:180792
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/180792/1/1024916871.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. P Healey, 1996. "The Communicative Turn in Planning Theory and its Implications for Spatial Strategy Formation," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 23(2), pages 217-234, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. te Brömmelstroet, Marco, 2017. "Towards a pragmatic research agenda for the PSS domain," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 77-83.
    2. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Krekeler, Martin & Zimmermann, Thomas, 2014. "Politikwissenschaftliche Forschungsheuristiken als Hilfsmittel bei der Evaluation von raumbedeutsamen Instrumenten," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Küpper, Patrick & Levin-Keitel, Meike & Maus, Friederike & Müller, Peter & Reimann, Sara & Sonderman (ed.), Raumentwicklung 3.0 - Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten, volume 8, pages 74-90, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    4. Fernando Nogueira & Monique Borges & Jan-Hendrik Wolf, 2017. "Collaborative Decision-Making in Non-formal Planning Settings," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 875-890, September.
    5. Lowry, Michael B., 2010. "Using optimization to program projects in the era of communicative rationality," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 94-101, March.
    6. Michael Lowry, 2010. "Online public deliberation for a regional transportation improvement decision," Transportation, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 39-58, January.
    7. Paul Stangl, 2008. "Evaluating the pedestrian realm: instrumental rationality, communicative rationality and phenomenology," Transportation, Springer, vol. 35(6), pages 759-775, November.
    8. Langmyhr, Tore, 1997. "Managing equity : The case of road pricing," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 4(1), pages 25-39, January.
    9. Adele Celino & Grazia Concilio, 2011. "Explorative Nature of Negotiation in Participatory Decision Making for Sustainability," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 255-270, March.
    10. Levin-Keitel, Meike & Sondermann, Martin, 2014. "Planerische Instrumente in lokalen Kontexten: Einblicke in die Vielfalt von Planungskulturen," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 172-191, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    11. Jonathan Rokem & Marco Allegra, 2016. "Planning in Turbulent Times: Exploring Planners' Agency in Jerusalem," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 640-657, May.
    12. Julio A. Soria-Lara & Luca Bertolini & Marco Te Brömmelstroet, 2017. "Towards a more effective EIA in transport planning: a literature review to derive interventions and mechanisms to improve knowledge integration," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 60(5), pages 755-772, May.
    13. Ernest Uwayezu & Walter T. De Vries, 2018. "Indicators for Measuring Spatial Justice and Land Tenure Security for Poor and Low Income Urban Dwellers," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-34, July.
    14. Huning, Sandra, 2014. "Wer plant für wen? Partizipation im Kontext gesellschaftlicher Differenzierung," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Küpper, Patrick & Levin-Keitel, Meike & Maus, Friederike & Müller, Peter & Reimann, Sara & Sonderman (ed.), Raumentwicklung 3.0 - Gemeinsam die Zukunft der räumlichen Planung gestalten, volume 8, pages 33-43, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    15. Angelique Chettiparamb, 2007. "Steering across scales: applying a strategic-relational approach to a study of land mobilisation for road widening in Kochi," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(3), pages 413-427.
    16. Lindkvist, Carmel & Juhasz-Nagy, Eszter & Nielsen, Brita Fladvad & Neumann, Hans-Martin & Lobaccaro, Gabriele & Wyckmans, Annemie, 2019. "Intermediaries for knowledge transfer in integrated energy planning of urban districts," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 354-363.
    17. Eero Valtonen & Heidi Falkenbach & Kauko Viitanen, 2017. "Development-led planning practices in a plan-led planning system: empirical evidence from Finland," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 1053-1075, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:180792. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.