IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/arlfba/141943.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Migrant(inn)en als Zielgruppe in quartiersbezogenen Stadtpolitiken: Ein Vergleich der Sozialen Stadt in Deutschland und der politique de la ville in Frankreich

In: Räumliche Auswirkungen der internationalen Migration

Author

Listed:
  • Weber, Florian
  • Glasze, Georg

Abstract

Mit der politique de la ville und der Sozialen Stadt wurden in Frankreich seit den 1970er Jahren und in Deutschland seit den 1990er Jahren quartiersbezogene Förderprogramme etabliert, die soziale Problemlagen durch Interventionen in spezifische Viertel beheben wollen. Begründung und Zielsetzung der Stadtpolitiken haben dabei zunächst ausschließlich auf städtebauliche Missstände und eine räumliche Konzentration von sozioökonomisch benachteiligten Bewohner(inne)n abgehoben. Der Beitrag untersucht, inwieweit in jüngerer Zeit Programme und Maßnahmen der quartiersbezogenen Förderprogramme in Frankreich und Deutschland explizit "Migrant(inn)en" als Adressaten hervorheben und dabei eine Differenzierung von Gesellschaft entlang kultureller Linien (re-)produzieren. Er sensibilisiert damit Stadtforschung, Planung und Politik dafür, dass (Stadt-)Politiken nicht einfach auf gegebene Problemlagen reagieren und gegebene Strukturierungen von Gesellschaft bearbeiten, sondern dass die Definition von Problemlagen und die Adressierung bestimmter Gruppen immer auch aktiv Gesellschaft in einer bestimmten Weise (re-)produzieren.

Suggested Citation

  • Weber, Florian & Glasze, Georg, 2014. "Migrant(inn)en als Zielgruppe in quartiersbezogenen Stadtpolitiken: Ein Vergleich der Sozialen Stadt in Deutschland und der politique de la ville in Frankreich," Forschungsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Gans, Paul (ed.), Räumliche Auswirkungen der internationalen Migration, volume 3, pages 344-364, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:141943
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/141943/1/fb_003_19.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roger Andersson & Sako Musterd, 2005. "Area‐Based Policies: A Critical Appraisal," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 96(4), pages 377-389, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manuel Fernández-García & Clemente J. Navarro & Irene Gómez-Ramirez, 2021. "Evaluating Territorial Targets of European Integrated Urban Policy. The URBAN and URBANA Initiatives in Spain (1994–2013)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Merle Zwiers & Maarten van Ham & Reinout Kleinhans, 2019. "The effects of physical restructuring on the socioeconomic status of neighbourhoods: Selective migration and upgrading," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 56(8), pages 1647-1663, June.
    3. Wouter van Gent & Cody Hochstenbach & Justus Uitermark, 2018. "Exclusion as urban policy: The Dutch ‘Act on Extraordinary Measures for Urban Problems’," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2337-2353, August.
    4. Hazel Easthope & Wendy Stone & Lynda Cheshire, 2018. "The decline of ‘advantageous disadvantage’ in gateway suburbs in Australia: The challenge of private housing market settlement for newly arrived migrants," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(9), pages 1904-1923, July.
    5. Anne Slob & Ronald Van Kempen & Gideon Bolt, 2006. "Spatial Knock-On Effects of Area-Based Urban Policies: Practices From Utrecht, the Netherlands," ERSA conference papers ersa06p464, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Henrik Gutzon Larsen & Anders Lund Hansen, 2008. "Gentrification—Gentle or Traumatic? Urban Renewal Policies and Socioeconomic Transformations in Copenhagen," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(12), pages 2429-2448, November.
    7. Anders Tønnesen & Kari Larsen & Joar Skrede & Vibeke Nenseth, 2014. "Understanding the Geographies of Transport and Cultural Heritage: Comparing Two Urban Development Programs in Oslo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(6), pages 1-21, May.
    8. Carolina Pacchi & Nicola Francesco Dotti & Mariachiara Barzotto, 2022. "New working spaces: Policy perspectives before and after the covid-19 pandemic," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/371915, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    9. Aarland, Kristin & Osland, Liv & Gjestland, Arnstein, 2017. "Do area-based intervention programs affect house prices? A quasi-experimental approach," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 67-83.
    10. Simone Scarpa, 2015. "The impact of income inequality on economic residential segregation: The case of Malmö, 1991–2010," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 906-922, April.
    11. Huub Ploegmakers & Pascal Beckers, 2015. "Evaluating urban regeneration: An assessment of the effectiveness of physical regeneration initiatives on run-down industrial sites in the Netherlands," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(12), pages 2151-2169, September.
    12. Willem R. Boterman & Wouter P.C. Gent, 2014. "Housing Liberalisation and Gentrification: The Social Effects of Tenure Conversions in Amsterdam," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 105(2), pages 140-160, April.
    13. Kleinhans, Reinout & van Ham, Maarten, 2013. "Lessons Learned from the Largest Tenure Mix Operation in the World: Right to Buy in the United Kingdom," IZA Discussion Papers 7168, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    14. Husam AlWaer & Joshua Speedie & Ian Cooper, 2021. "Unhealthy Neighbourhood “Syndrome”: A Useful Label for Analysing and Providing Advice on Urban Design Decision-Making?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-30, June.
    15. Ángel R. Zapata-Moya & María J. Martín-Díaz & Francisco J. Viciana-Fernández, 2021. "Area-Based Policies and Potential Health Benefits: A Quasi-Experimental Cohort Study in Vulnerable Urban Areas of Andalusia (Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-17, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arlfba:141943. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arlhade.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.