IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s5_160-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Enhancing Project Management – a Quality Gate Usage

Author

Listed:
  • Saroj Koul

    (Jindal Global Business School, India)

  • J. Joshuva Alexander

    (Jindal Global Business School, India)

Abstract

Purpose: In most companies achieving or delivering quality product or service becomes a complex task especially when setting up a new production process; every time focusing on project completion, meeting deadlines and quality check at the end of the production. Two types of quality checks can be applied to reduce the complexity of the project, i) quality control (QC) - which is established for monitoring and continuously check the output and performance of a product at an operational level, and ii) quality management gates (QG) – which are used for decision making that impacts the outcome of the project. Among these two concepts QG concept is one of the most established approaches to address the described quality issues. In this paper, we attempt to explain QG with an example to understand the supportive tools that are required for a successful implementation of quality gate at the project execution phase. Design methodology/approach: The approach described in this case conceptualizes the process of implementation of quality gate to manage the quality performance of the project process flow. Research limitations: - This specific time bound research is limited to the implementation of QG only since development of the electronic quality gates needed sufficient time to validate for including the corrective measures after feedback was received to come to the desired outcome of the research. Research implications: The findings of the exploratory study can offer valuable insights and recommendations as how the quality gate can be implemented, its necessary supportive tools, how to go about into electronic format, and its benefits. Originality/value: This conceptual research provides comprehensive idea to implement the quality gate in projects by step-by-step procedures to have the best quality management to evaluate and deliver the best project to the customer. It provides immense idea to other researchers and industrialists to choose a right quality management tool.

Suggested Citation

  • Saroj Koul & J. Joshuva Alexander, 2013. "Enhancing Project Management – a Quality Gate Usage," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
  • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s5_160-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S5_160-172.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayas, Karen, 1997. "Integrating corporate learning with project management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 51(1-2), pages 59-67, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De Toni, Alberto F. & Pessot, Elena, 2021. "Investigating organisational learning to master project complexity: An embedded case study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 541-554.
    2. Li, Yuan & Wei, Zelong & Zhao, Jie & Zhang, Chenlu & Liu, Yi, 2013. "Ambidextrous organizational learning, environmental munificence and new product performance: Moderating effect of managerial ties in China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 95-105.
    3. Ojha, Divesh & Acharya, Chandan & Cooper, Danielle, 2018. "Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 215-231.
    4. da Silva Gonçalves Zangiski, Marlene Aparecida & Pinheiro de Lima, Edson & Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E., 2013. "Organizational competence building and development: Contributions to operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(1), pages 76-89.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s5_160-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.