IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s2_142-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Using Sustainable Competitive Advantages to Measure Technological Opportunities

Author

Listed:
  • Josu Takala

    (University of Vaasa, Finland)

  • Matti Muhos

    (University of Vaasa, Finland)

  • Sara Tilabi

    (University of Vaasa, Finland)

  • Mehmet Serif TAS

    (University of Vaasa, Finland)

  • Bingli Yan

    (University of Vaasa, Finland)

Abstract

Purpose: This paper tries to find operative competitive advantage. The results of this paper help small and medium size enterprises (SMEs) which are striving to export. In fact, this paper introduces a new technique which applies critical factor analysis, risk and opportunities analysis to measure and propose resource allocation for companies in couple of next years. Research questions: In this paper two questions are answered: 1. How to evaluate Knowledge and Technology (K/T) effect on operative Sustainable Competitive Advantages (SCA)?. 2. How the results from calculation Critical Factor Indexes (CFIs), SCA level and K/T are evaluated? Design/Methodology/approach: This research is based on 7 case studies from Oulu South region of Finland. The cases were selected from manufacturing industry including cases focusing on manufacturing of wood product, machinery and equipment, and instruments and appliances. In this research paper, the effect of technology and knowledge on SCA risk level is investigated. In other words, here this question is answered: what would be the effect of T/K calculation on (Balanced) Critical Factor Index changes. Findings: The effect of Knowledge/Technology(K/T) on (Balanced) Critical Factor Index changes depending on the proportions allocated among the different technological levels (Basic, Core or Spearhead) for each attribute separately. Therefore, the effect of K/T may be analyzed by taking the dominating technology and the resource allocation into consideration for each attribute respectively. Research limitations/implications: in this research paper, 7 case studies are investigated. For 6 of them, at least 2 respondents are interviewed. However in one case, there is only one respondent. So in this case, the calculation of CFI factor is not possible. Moreover, as the number of respondents of each case is not big, so it is not possible to eliminate the effect of standard deviation in calculation of CFIs factor. Practical implications: This research helps firms to take balance in resource allocation for each attribute in changing environments on the basis of different level of technology (Basic, Core or Spearhead).

Suggested Citation

  • Josu Takala & Matti Muhos & Sara Tilabi & Mehmet Serif TAS & Bingli Yan, 2013. "Using Sustainable Competitive Advantages to Measure Technological Opportunities," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_142-163
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S2_142-163.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kraaijenbrink, Jeroen & Spender, JC & Groen, Aard, 2009. "The resource-based view: A review and assessment of its critiques," MPRA Paper 21442, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Muturi, Moses Murimi & Beatrice Elesani Ombaka & Joseph Muchiri, 2019. "Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Performance of Small and Medium Manufacturing Enterprises in Kenya," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 12(2), pages 22-32, December.
    2. Trippel, Arthur, 2015. "Born Globals: Darstellung und kritische Würdigung," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 1, number 12015.
    3. Marcus Adam, 2018. "The Role of Human Resource Management (HRM) for the Implementation of Sustainable Product-Service Systems (PSS)—An Analysis of Fashion Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Haili Zhang & Yufan Wang & Michael Song, 2019. "Does Competitive Intensity Moderate the Relationships between Sustainable Capabilities and Sustainable Organizational Performance in New Ventures?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-18, December.
    5. Santanu Mandal & Souvik Roy & G. Amar Raju, 2016. "Tourism supply chain agility: an empirical examination using resource-based view," International Journal of Business Forecasting and Marketing Intelligence, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(2), pages 151-173.
    6. Wilkin, Carla L. & Couchman, Paul K. & Sohal, Amrik & Zutshi, Ambika, 2016. "Exploring differences between smaller and large organizations' corporate governance of information technology," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 6-25.
    7. Jensen, Peter D. Ørberg, 2012. "A passage to India: A dual case study of activities, processes and resources in offshore outsourcing of advanced services," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 311-326.
    8. Ante Glavas & Jenny Mish, 2015. "Resources and Capabilities of Triple Bottom Line Firms: Going Over Old or Breaking New Ground?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 623-642, March.
    9. John Cantrell & Elias Kyriazis & Gary Noble, 2015. "Developing CSR Giving as a Dynamic Capability for Salient Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 403-421, August.
    10. Spyros Arvanitis & Florian Seliger & Tobias Stucki, 2016. "The relative importance of human resource management practices for innovation," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(8), pages 769-800, November.
    11. Horacio E. Rousseau, 2017. "Corporate Sustainability: Toward a Theoretical Integration of Catholic Social Teaching and the Natural-Resource-Based View of the Firm," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(4), pages 725-737, November.
    12. Paul C. Fenema & A. Georges L. Romme, 2020. "Latent organizing for responding to emergencies: foundations for research," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, December.
    13. Jianxin Ge & Tong Li, 2019. "Entrepreneurial Resources, Complementary Assets, and Platform Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-20, August.
    14. de Jong, Gjalt & Phan, T. Binh & van Ees, Hans, 2011. "Does the meta-environment determine firm performance? Theory and evidence from European multinational enterprises," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 454-465, August.
    15. Ivan Rodrigo Rizzo Dias & George Bedinelli Rossi, 2017. "How far is World Champion from World Class? Institutional effects on a Brazilian non-profit sports organization," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 14(Special I), pages 24-44, January.
    16. Arup Barua & Alexandra Ioanid, 2021. "Synergistic Competitive Advantage - The Modern Appeal of RBV and IO Theory in the Mergers and Acquisitions," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2021-06, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Jul 2021.
    17. Ho, Joanne & Plewa, Carolin & Lu, Vinh Nhat, 2016. "Examining strategic orientation complementarity using multiple regression analysis and fuzzy set QCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 2199-2205.
    18. Oleg Curbatov & Marie Louyot-Gallicher, 2015. "Knowedge Marketing," Post-Print hal-01423209, HAL.
    19. Baraldi, Enrico & Gressetvold, Espen & Harrison, Debbie, 2012. "Resource interaction in inter-organizational networks: Foundations, comparison, and a research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 266-276.
    20. Dailin Alejandra Ramírez-Altamirano & Patricia S. Sánchez-Medina & René Díaz-Pichardo & Manuel F. Suárez-Barraza, 2024. "Transformational Environmental Leadership and Corporate Social Responsibility as Triggers of Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Performance in Environmentally Certified Companies in Mexico," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-22, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s2_142-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.