IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/tkp/tiim13/s1_18-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Perceived Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies in Online Group-Buying

Author

Listed:
  • Fei-Fei Cheng

    (Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan)

  • Tien-Yin Liu, Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan

    (Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan)

  • Chin-Shan Wu

    (Department of Information Management, Tunghai University, Taiwan)

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this research is to examine the relationship between risk perceptions (financial, performance, social, time and privacy risks) and risk reduction strategies (brand loyalty, word of mouth, past experience, money back guarantee, store image, shopping, major brand image, free sample, website reputation, and payment security) in online group buying context. Design/methodology/approach: A questionnaire survey was conducted in campus. There are 212 questionnaires were received, and 198 of them are valid. Findings: The results from current study suggested that when subjects perceived financial risk, the brand loyalty, word of mouth, money back guarantee, website reputation and payment system will be adopted to reduce the risk. In addition, performance risk is related to brand loyalty, word of mouth, money back guarantee, major brand image and free sample. Time risk is related to shopping and website reputation, while privacy risk has significant correlation with shopping. There are no risk-reduction strategies related to social risk. Thus, the practitioner have to try some other ways to reduce social risk. Practical implications: Results from current study provide useful knowledge to help the operators who are running online group business in understanding useful strategies to reduce different risks perceived by their potential customers. For example, building strong brands and store image, encourage consumers to spread positive word of mouth are useful ways to mitigate consumers’ concern about the performance of the product/service. Originality/value: Online group-buying is one of the fasted growing business model. However, knowledge regarding consumers’ concern and possible ways to relief the perceived risks in online group-buying context are limited. Results from current study can contribute to the field by illustrating the useful strategies the e-vendors can use to reduce possible concerns.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei-Fei Cheng & Tien-Yin Liu, Institute of Technology Management, National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan & Chin-Shan Wu, 2013. "Perceived Risks and Risk Reduction Strategies in Online Group-Buying," Diversity, Technology, and Innovation for Operational Competitiveness: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Technology Innovation and Industrial Management,, ToKnowPress.
    • Handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_18-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.toknowpress.net/ISBN/978-961-6914-07-9/papers/S1_18-25.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Derbaix, C., 1983. "Perceived risk and risk relievers: An empirical investigation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 3(1), pages 19-38.
    2. Forsythe, Sandra M. & Shi, Bo, 2003. "Consumer patronage and risk perceptions in Internet shopping," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(11), pages 867-875, November.
    3. Krishnan S. Anand & Ravi Aron, 2003. "Group Buying on the Web: A Comparison of Price-Discovery Mechanisms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 49(11), pages 1546-1562, November.
    4. Grewal, Dhruv & Gotlieb, Jerry & Marmorstein, Howard, 1994. "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 21(1), pages 145-153, June.
    5. Van den Poel, Dirk & Leunis, Joseph, 1999. "Consumer Acceptance of the Internet as a Channel of Distribution," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 249-256, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cho, Sang-Hee & Ali, Faizan & Manhas, Parikshat Singh, 2018. "Examining the impact of risk perceptions on intentions to travel by air: A comparison of full -service carriers and low-cost carriers," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 20-27.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noort, Guda Van & Kerkhof, Peter & Fennis, Bob M., 2008. "The persuasiveness of online safety cues: The impact of prevention focus compatibility of Web content on consumers’ risk perceptions, attitudes, and intentions," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 58-72.
    2. Chang, En-Chi & Tseng, Ya-Fen, 2013. "Research note: E-store image, perceived value and perceived risk," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(7), pages 864-870.
    3. Ieva, M. & De Canio, F. & Ziliani, C., 2018. "Daily deal shoppers: What drives social couponing?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 299-303.
    4. Sang Soo Kim, 2020. "Purchase Intention in the Online Open Market: Do Concerns for E-Commerce Really Matter?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Aghekyan-Simonian, Mariné & Forsythe, Sandra & Suk Kwon, Wi & Chattaraman, Veena, 2012. "The role of product brand image and online store image on perceived risks and online purchase intentions for apparel," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 325-331.
    6. Sheau-Fen, Yap & Sun-May, Leong & Yu-Ghee, Wee, 2012. "Store brand proneness: Effects of perceived risks, quality and familiarity," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 48-58.
    7. Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J. & Jager, Wander, 2004. "A conceptual model of channel choice: measuring online and offline shopping value perceptions," Research Report 04F04, University of Groningen, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organisations and Management).
    8. Taylor, David G. & Strutton, David, 2010. "Has e-marketing come of age? Modeling historical influences on post-adoption era Internet consumer behaviors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(9-10), pages 950-956, September.
    9. Cao, XinYu & Mokhtarian, Patricia L, 2005. "The Intended and Actual Adoption of Online Purchasing: A Brief Review of Recent Literature," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt45q5p1vb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    10. Zablocki, Agnieszka & Makri, Katerina & Houston, Michael J., 2019. "Emotions Within Online Reviews and their Influence on Product Attitudes in Austria, USA and Thailand," Journal of Interactive Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 20-39.
    11. Christophe Bezes, 2011. "Types de risques perçus et réducteurs de risques dans le commerce électronique : le cas du site Fnac.com," Post-Print hal-02086726, HAL.
    12. repec:dgr:rugsom:04f04 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Yu-Shan Chen & Stanley Y.B. Huang, 2017. "The effect of task-technology fit on purchase intention: The moderating role of perceived risks," Journal of Risk Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(11), pages 1418-1438, November.
    14. Ou, Carol & Zhang, Xiaowei & Angelopoulos, Spyros & Davison, Robert & Janse, Noury, 2022. "Security breaches and organization response strategy : Exploring consumers’ threat and coping appraisals," Other publications TiSEM 9ac0c2eb-87e8-4c1d-a0b0-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    15. Frederiks, Elisha R. & Stenner, Karen & Hobman, Elizabeth V., 2015. "Household energy use: Applying behavioural economics to understand consumer decision-making and behaviour," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1385-1394.
    16. Elpida TENIDOU & Dimosthenis PAPPAS & Ioannis KAZANIDIS & Stavros VALSAMIDIS, 2016. "The Usage Of E-Commerce In The Area Of Evros, Greece," Scientific Bulletin - Economic Sciences, University of Pitesti, vol. 15(2), pages 3-19.
    17. Bayuk, Julia Belyavsky & Patrick, Vanessa M., 2021. "Is the uphill road the one more taken? How task complexity prompts action on non-pressing tasks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 436-449.
    18. Zafer Akýn & Ý. Erdem Seçilmiþ, 2015. "Risk Behavior, Risk Perception and Online Shopping: An Experimental Approach," IPEK Working Papers 1507, Ipek University, Department of Economics, revised Sep 2015.
    19. Janakiraman, Narayan & Syrdal, Holly A. & Freling, Ryan, 2016. "The Effect of Return Policy Leniency on Consumer Purchase and Return Decisions: A Meta-analytic Review," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 92(2), pages 226-235.
    20. Usman YOUSAF & Mohsin ALTAF & Noman SARWAR & Syed Ali Hassan SHAH, 2012. "Hesitancy Towards Online Shopping, A Study Of Pakistani Consumers," Management and Marketing Journal, University of Craiova, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, vol. 0(2), pages 273-284, November.
    21. Claudia BOBALCA, 2015. "The Loyal Customers’ Perception Regarding The Online Buying Process," CES Working Papers, Centre for European Studies, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, vol. 7(2), pages 241-255, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tkp:tiim13:s1_18-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Maks Jezovnik (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.toknowpress.net/conferences .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.