IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-31579-4_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?

In: Corporate Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Eliezer M. Fich

    (Drexel University)

  • Anil Shivdasani

    (University of North Carolina)

Abstract

Firms with busy boards, those in which a majority of outside directors hold three or more directorships, are associated with weak corporate governance. These firms exhibit lower market-to-book ratios, weaker profitability, and lower sensitivity of CEO turnover to firm performance. Independent but busy boards display CEO turnover-performance sensitivities indistinguishable from those of inside-dominated boards. Departures of busy outside directors generate positive abnormal returns. When directors become busy as a result of acquiring an additional directorship, other companies in which they hold board seats experience negative abnormal returns. Busy outside directors are more likely to depart boards following poor performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliezer M. Fich & Anil Shivdasani, 2012. "Are Busy Boards Effective Monitors?," Springer Books, in: Sabri Boubaker & Bang Dang Nguyen & Duc Khuong Nguyen (ed.), Corporate Governance, edition 127, pages 221-258, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-31579-4_10
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-31579-4_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Colin P. Green & Swarnodeep Homroy, 2022. "Incorporated in Westminster: Channels and Returns to Political Connection in the United Kingdom," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 89(354), pages 377-408, April.
    2. Yasaman Sarabi & Matthew Smith & Heather McGregor & Dimitris Christopoulos, 2021. "Gendered brokerage and firm performance – An interlock analysis of the UK," International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(2), pages 306-330, June.
    3. Nailesh Limbasiya & Hitesh Shukla, 2019. "Effect of Board Diversity, Promoter’s Presence and Multiple Directorships on Firm Performance," Indian Journal of Corporate Governance, , vol. 12(2), pages 169-186, December.
    4. Sheng‐Fu Wu & Chung‐Yi Fang & Wei Chen, 2020. "Corporate governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Taiwan," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1312-1326, October.
    5. Kerstin Lopatta & Sebastian Tideman & Katarina Böttcher & Timm Wichern, 2019. "Managerial Style – A Literature Review and Research Agenda," International Business Research, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 80-98, February.
    6. Chen, Jiamin & Fan, Yaoyao & Zhang, Xuezhi, 2022. "Rookie independent directors and corporate fraud in China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 46(PB).
    7. Dayana Mastura Baharudin & Maran Marimuthu, 2020. "The Senior Independent Director’s Evolving Role Across the Top 100 Malaysian PLCs: MCCG 2012 vs MCCG 2017," Business Management and Strategy, Macrothink Institute, vol. 11(2), pages 79-93, December.
    8. Twardawski, Torsten & Kind, Axel, 2023. "Board overconfidence in mergers and acquisitions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-31579-4_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.