IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/mgmchp/978-3-319-98705-7_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Complaint-Management Controlling

In: Effective Complaint Management

Author

Listed:
  • Bernd Stauss

    (Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt)

  • Wolfgang Seidel

    (servmark consultancy)

Abstract

Complaint management controlling consists of three areas: evidence controlling, task controlling and cost-benefit controlling. Evidence controlling determines the extent to which customer dissatisfaction is expressed in complaints. It reveals the extent of non-articulated (“unvoiced”) and non-registered (“hidden”) complaints, and thus makes the real size of the ‘annoyance iceberg’ visible. The focus of task controlling is the specification and monitoring of quality and productivity standards. In the course of subjective task controlling the quality of task fulfillment is monitored from the complainants’ point of view. For this purpose the satisfaction of complainants with all aspects of complaint handling is measured and satisfaction and loyalty standards are set. Objective task controlling defines objective quality and productivity standards for all task modules of complaint management. The operational control of complaint management tasks can be carried out using the Complaint Management Index (BMI) which provides a quick overview of to what degree the defined quality and productivity targets have been reached. Cost-benefit-controlling serves to assess the profitability of complaint management. The costs of complaint management are recorded and analyzed in cost controlling either according to traditional cost accounting or by means of activity-based costing. The purpose of benefit controlling is the monetary evaluation of the information benefit, the retention benefit and the communication benefit of complaint management. The information benefit can be estimated primarily on the basis of the reduction of warranty and guarantee costs resulting from the use of complaint information. The retention benefit consists of the revenues and profits generated by those customers who could be retained by complaint management. The communication benefit lies in the revenues and profits generated by those customers who could be won by positive word-of-mouth communication of satisfied complainants. The Return on Complaint Management (RoCM) can be used as a measure of the economic efficiency of complaint management.

Suggested Citation

  • Bernd Stauss & Wolfgang Seidel, 2019. "Complaint-Management Controlling," Management for Professionals, in: Effective Complaint Management, edition 2, chapter 11, pages 235-303, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-98705-7_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-98705-7_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:mgmchp:978-3-319-98705-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.