IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/pshchp/978-3-031-63949-4_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The “Cambridge” Critique of the Quantity Theory of Money. A Note on How Quantitative Easing Vindicates It

In: Economic Theories, Protagonists and Facts

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

Through quantitative easing markets have been flooded with liquidity, but rather than inflation we have witnessed a general deflation because of the liquidity trap environment in which the banking system operated; this article revisits the arguments against the quantity theory in the “Cambridge” tradition of John Maynard Keynes, Richard Kahn, and Nicholas Kaldor, and defends their soundness and topicality.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Cristina Marcuzzo, 2024. "The “Cambridge” Critique of the Quantity Theory of Money. A Note on How Quantitative Easing Vindicates It," Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Thought, in: Economic Theories, Protagonists and Facts, chapter 0, pages 211-226, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-031-63949-4_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-63949-4_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonella Tutino & Carlos E. Zarazaga, 2014. "Inflation is not always and everywhere a monetary phenomenon," Economic Letter, Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas, vol. 9(6), pages 1-4, June.
    2. L. R. Wray, 1990. "Money and Credit in Capitalist Economies," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 474.
    3. Vasilev, Aleksandar & Maksumov, Rashid, 2010. "Critical analysis of Chapter 23 of Keynes’s Notes on Mercantilism in The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money (1936)," EconStor Research Reports 155318, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Targetti, Ferdinando, 1992. "Nicholas Kaldor: The Economics and Politics of Capitalism as a Dynamic System," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780198283485.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boháčik Ján, 2022. "Financial shocks and their effects on velocity of money in agent-based model," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(4), pages 241-266, December.
    2. Maciej Ryczkowski, 2021. "Money and inflation in inflation-targeting regimes – new evidence from time–frequency analysis," Journal of Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(1), pages 17-44, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Felipe Rezende, 2015. "Demand for financial assets and monetary policy: a restatement of the liquidity preference theory and the speculative demand for money," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 64-92, July.
    2. Giuseppe Fontana, 2002. "The Making of Monetary Policy in Endogenous Money Theory: An Introduction," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 503-509, July.
    3. Christopher J. Niggle, 1991. "The Endogenous Money Supply Theory: An Institutionalist Appraisal," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 137-151, March.
    4. Felipe Rezende, 2016. "Unconventional monetary policy, liquidity trap, and asset prices," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(3), pages 411-436, July.
    5. repec:ilo:ilowps:366690 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lloyd Ulman, 1992. "Why Should Human Resource Managers Pay High Wages?," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 30(2), pages 177-212, June.
    7. Hany Shawky & Ronald Forbes & Alan Frankle, 1983. "Liquidity Services and Capital Market Equilibrium: The Case for Money Market Mutual Funds," Journal of Financial Research, Southern Finance Association;Southwestern Finance Association, vol. 6(2), pages 141-152, June.
    8. L. Randall Wray, 2011. "Waiting for the Next Crash: The Minskyan Lessons We Failed to Learn," Economics Public Policy Brief Archive ppb_120, Levy Economics Institute.
    9. Hideaki Aoyama & Hiroshi Yoshikawa & Hiroshi Iyetomi & Yoshi Fujiwara, 2008. "Labour Productivity Superstatistics," Papers 0809.3541, arXiv.org.
    10. Ulrich van Suntum, "undated". "The Purchasing Power Argument – Could Rising Wages Foster Employment?," Working Papers 200126, Institute of Spatial and Housing Economics, Munster Universitary.
    11. P. Arestis & C. Driver, 1984. "The Policy Implications of Post Keynesianism," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 1093-1105, December.
    12. Paul Davidson, 1985. "Liquidity and Not Increasing Returns is the Ultimate Source of Unemployment Equilibrium," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(3), pages 373-384, March.
    13. Masaaki Shirakawa, 2010. "Revisiting the Philosophy behind Central Bank Policy," International Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 13(3), pages 485-493, December.
    14. Diarmid Weir, 2013. "Fiat Money, Individual Rationality and Production," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 64(4), pages 573-590, November.
    15. James Forder, 2010. "The historical place of the 'Friedman—Phelps' expectations critique," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(3), pages 493-511.
    16. Palash Deb & Parthiban David & Jonathan O'Brien, 2017. "When is cash good or bad for firm performance?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(2), pages 436-454, February.
    17. Schlicht, Ekkehart, . "Isolation and Aggregation in Economics," Monographs in Economics, University of Munich, Department of Economics, number 3, November.
    18. Phil Armstrong, 2020. "Can Heterodox Economics Make a Difference?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19964.
    19. Shackelford, Douglas A. & Shaviro, Daniel N. & Slemrod, Joel, 2010. "Taxation and the Financial Sector," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 63(4), pages 781-806, December.
    20. Heise, Arne, 2018. "Postkeynesianismus: Ein heterodoxer Ansatz auf der Suche nach einer Fundierung," ZÖSS-Discussion Papers 69, University of Hamburg, Centre for Economic and Sociological Studies (CESS/ZÖSS).
    21. Shyam Gouri Suresh & Mark Setterfield, 2015. "Firm performance, macroeconomic conditions, and “animal spirits” in a Post Keynesian model of aggregate fluctuations," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 38-63, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cambridge monetary theory; Inflation; Quantitative easing;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • B31 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought: Individuals - - - Individuals
    • E31 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles - - - Price Level; Inflation; Deflation
    • E40 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - Money and Interest Rates - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:pshchp:978-3-031-63949-4_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.