IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/palchp/978-0-230-23700-1_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Revisiting the UK Model: From Basket Case to Success Story and Back Again?

In: European Employment Models in Flux

Author

Listed:
  • Jill Rubery

    (Manchester Business School)

  • Damian Grimshaw

    (Manchester Business School)

  • Rory Donnelly

    (Manchester Business School)

  • Peter Urwin

    (Organizer for UNISON)

Abstract

When the UK took over the presidency of the European Union in July 2005, the then Prime Minister Tony Blair presented the UK model as a potential saviour for the European social model, a model for the rest of Europe to emulate. It had succeeded, it was claimed, not only in combining growth with high employment rates, facilitated by flexible labour and product markets, but also for using economic growth and modern approaches to public service and welfare reform to renew public services and to combat child poverty. Even at the time these claims were met with scepticism; for many the UK still represented the liberal or market version of capitalism which, if followed as the model for modernization, could not only sound the death knell for distinctively European varieties of capitalism (Wickham, 2005) but also promote a dangerously fragile form of expansion, based on extended consumer credit and a seemingly never-ending rise in house prices. From the perspective of autumn 2008, the grandiose claims by Blair to have developed a blueprint for Europe have been put in perspective by the financial meltdown and the state-led rescue plan for the jewel in the UK’s crown, the City of London. This major collapse of the UK and world financial system is too new and its course as yet too unpredictable for this chapter to predict the characteristics of the next phase of model development in the UK. It is appropriate to note, however, that we are witnessing a clear demonstration of the cyclical volatility of the fortunes of national models (see Chapter 1 of this volume). The decade of New Labour could be argued to be the UK’s glory years, with high employment combined with some renewal of its social model, even if the underlying weaknesses of the model could be clearly identified. The focus of this chapter is on understanding the factors behind the New Labour boom period and the extent to which its characteristics both reinforced and redefined the UK model as an example of neoliberal capitalism and a residual welfare state.

Suggested Citation

  • Jill Rubery & Damian Grimshaw & Rory Donnelly & Peter Urwin, 2009. "Revisiting the UK Model: From Basket Case to Success Story and Back Again?," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Gerhard Bosch & Steffen Lehndorff & Jill Rubery (ed.), European Employment Models in Flux, chapter 2, pages 57-80, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-23700-1_2
    DOI: 10.1057/9780230237001_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Freyssinet, Jacques., 2010. "Les réponses tripartites à la crise économique dans les principaux pays d'Europe occidentale," ILO Working Papers 994567583402676, International Labour Organization.
    2. repec:ilo:ilowps:456758 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Martina Bisello & Vincenzo Maccarrone & Enrique Fernández-Macías, 2022. "Occupational mobility, employment transitions and job quality in Europe: The impact of the Great Recession," Economic and Industrial Democracy, Department of Economic History, Uppsala University, Sweden, vol. 43(2), pages 585-611, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palchp:978-0-230-23700-1_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.