Premium Inventions: Patents and Prizes as Incentive Mechanisms in Britain and the United States, 1750-1930
In: Understanding Long-Run Economic Growth: Geography, Institutions, and the Knowledge Economy
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
References listed on IDEAS
- Kremer, Michael R., 1998. "Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation," Scholarly Articles 3693705, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Daron Acemoglu & Kostas Bimpikis & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2011.
"Experimentation, Patents, and Innovation,"
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 3(1), pages 37-77, February.
- Daron Acemoglu & Kostas Bimpikis & Asuman Ozdaglar, 2008. "Experimentation, Patents, and Innovation," NBER Working Papers 14408, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daron Acemoglu & Kostas Bimpikis & Asuman E. Ozdaglar, 2009. "Experimentation, Patents, and Innovation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 814577000000000081, David K. Levine.
- Michael Kremer, 1998.
"Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(4), pages 1137-1167.
- Michael Kremer, 1997. "Patent Buy-Outs: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation," NBER Working Papers 6304, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Billington, Stephen D., 2018. "Patent costs and the value of inventions: Explaining patenting behaviour between England, Ireland and Scotland, 1617-1852," QUCEH Working Paper Series 2018-10, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University Centre for Economic History.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Liotard, Isabelle & Revest, Valérie, 2018.
"Contests as innovation policy instruments: Lessons from the US federal agencies' experience,"
Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 57-69.
- Isabelle Liotard & Valérie Revest, 2018. "Contests as innovation policy instruments: lessons from the US federal agencies’ experience," Post-Print hal-02067342, HAL.
- Tuomas Takalo, 2012.
"Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies,"
Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, Lifescience Global, vol. 1, pages 157-167.
- Takalo, Tuomas, 2009. "Rationales and Instruments for Public Innovation Policies," Discussion Papers 1185, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
- Takalo, Tuomas, 2013. "Rationales and instruments for public innovation policies," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 1/2013, Bank of Finland.
- Thomas Hellmann & Veikko Thiele, 2019. "Fostering Entrepreneurship: Promoting Founding or Funding?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2502-2521, June.
- Josh Lerner, 2002.
"150 Years of Patent Protection,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 92(2), pages 221-225, May.
- Josh Lerner, 2000. "150 Years of Patent Protection," NBER Working Papers 7478, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Josh Lerner, 2003. "150 Years of Patent Protection," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000587, David K. Levine.
- Michael Kremer & Jonathan Levin & Christopher M. Snyder, 2022.
"Designing Advance Market Commitments for New Vaccines,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4786-4814, July.
- Michael Kremer & Jonathan D. Levin & Christopher M. Snyder, 2020. "Designing Advance Market Commitments for New Vaccines," Working Papers 2020-175, Becker Friedman Institute for Research In Economics.
- Michael Kremer & Jonathan D. Levin & Christopher M. Snyder, 2020. "Designing Advance Market Commitments for New Vaccines," NBER Working Papers 28168, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Galasso, Alberto & Mitchell, Matthew & Virag, Gabor, 2018.
"A theory of grand innovation prizes,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 343-362.
- Galasso, Alberto & Virag, Gabor & Mitchell, Matthew, 2017. "A Theory of Grand Innovation Prizes," CEPR Discussion Papers 11860, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Neves, Pedro Cunha & Afonso, Oscar & Silva, Diana & Sochirca, Elena, 2021. "The link between intellectual property rights, innovation, and growth: A meta-analysis," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 196-209.
- Eric Budish & Benjamin Roin & Heidi Williams, 2013. "Do fixed patent terms distort innovation? Evidence from cancer clinical trials," Discussion Papers 13-001, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
- Joshua Gans & Scott Stern, 2003.
"When does funding research by smaller firms bear fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR program,"
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(4), pages 361-384.
- Joshua S. Gans & Scott Stern, 2000. "When Does Funding Research by Smaller Firms Bear Fruit?: Evidence from the SBIR Program," NBER Working Papers 7877, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Le, Son & Sukhatme, Neel U., 2020. "Reaching for mediocrity: Competition and stagnation in pharmaceutical innovation," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
- David Rietzke & Yu Chen, 2020.
"Push or pull? Performance‐pay, incentives, and information,"
RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 51(1), pages 301-317, March.
- Yu Chen & David Michael Rietzke, 2016. "Push or pull? Performance pay, incentives, and information," Working Papers 127987900, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.
- David Rietzke & Yu Chen, 2018. "Push or Pull? Performance-Pay, Incentives, and Information," Graz Economics Papers 2018-12, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
- Adrian Towse & Michele Pistollato & Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz & Zeba Khan & Satyin Kaura & Louis Garrison, 2015. "European Union Pharmaceutical Markets: A Case for Differential Pricing?," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 263-275, July.
- Iain M. Cockburn & Jean O. Lanjouw & Mark Schankerman, 2016.
"Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 106(1), pages 136-164, January.
- Iain M. Cockburn & Jean O. Lanjouw & Mark Schankerman, 2014. "Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs," NBER Working Papers 20492, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Iain Cockburn & Jean O. Lanjouw & Mark Schankerman, 2014. "Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs," CEP Discussion Papers dp1298, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
- Cockburn, Iain & Lanjouw, Jean O. & Schankerman, Mark, 2016. "Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 65415, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Cockburn, Iain & Lanjouw, Jean O. & Schankerman, Mark, 2014. "Patents and the global diffusion of new drugs," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 60450, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Schankerman, Mark & Cockburn, Iain M & Lanjouw, Jean, 2014. "Patents and the Global Diffusion of New Drugs," CEPR Discussion Papers 10149, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Amy Diduch, 2010. "Patents and R&D: a Classroom Experiment," International Review of Economic Education, Economics Network, University of Bristol, vol. 9(2), pages 67-83.
- Yin, Nina, 2023. "Pharmaceuticals, incremental innovation and market exclusivity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
- Greif, Avner & Iyigun, Murat & Sasson, Diego, 2011. "Risk, Institutions and Growth: Why England and Not China?," IZA Discussion Papers 5598, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
- Newell, Richard G. & Wilson, Nathan E., 2005.
"Technology Prizes for Climate Change Mitigation,"
Discussion Papers
10698, Resources for the Future.
- Newell, Richard & Wilson, Nathan, 2005. "Technology Prizes for Climate Change Mitigation," RFF Working Paper Series dp-05-33, Resources for the Future.
- Yeon-Koo Che & Elisabetta Iossa & Patrick Rey, 2021.
"Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation [Subgame Perfect Implementation Under Information Perturbations],"
The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(5), pages 2149-2178.
- Yeon-Koo Che & Elisabetta Iossa & Patrick Rey, 2015. "Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation," CEIS Research Paper 358, Tor Vergata University, CEIS, revised 22 Oct 2015.
- Yeon-Koo Che & Elisabetta Iossa & Patrick Rey, 2021. "Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation," Post-Print hal-03544026, HAL.
- Iossa, Elisabetta & Che, Yeon-Koo & Rey, Patrick, 2017. "Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 11904, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Che, Yeon-Koo & Iossa, Elisabetta & Rey, Patrick, 2016. "Prizes versus Contracts as Incentives for Innovation," TSE Working Papers 16-695, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Nov 2020.
- Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, 2011.
"Filing strategies and patent value,"
Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(6), pages 539-561, February.
- Bruno VAN POTTELSBERGHE & Nicolas VAN ZEEBROECK, 2008. "Filing Strategies and Patent Value," EcoMod2008 23800148, EcoMod.
- van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno & van Zeebroeck, Nicolas, 2008. "Filing Strategies and Patent Value," CEPR Discussion Papers 6821, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe, 2008. "Filing strategies and patent value," Working Papers CEB 08-016.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Nicolas van Zeebroeck & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe, 2011. "Filing strategies and patent value," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/60731, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
- Nancy Gallini & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2002.
"Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?,"
NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 2, pages 51-78,
National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Gallini, Nancy & Scotchmer, Suzanne, 2001. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt9wx2c2hz, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
- Nancy Gallini & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2003. "Intellectual Property: When is it the Best Incentive System?," Levine's Working Paper Archive 618897000000000532, David K. Levine.
- Nancy Gallini & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2002. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?," Law and Economics 0201001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Nancy Gallini and Suzanne Scotchmer., 2001. "Intellectual Property: When Is It the Best Incentive System?," Economics Working Papers E01-303, University of California at Berkeley.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:12000. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.