Fostering the Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies: Evidence from the Licensing of the Transistor Patents
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1111/joie.12311
Download full text from publisher
Other versions of this item:
- Schnitzer, Monika & Nagler, Markus & Watzinger, Martin, 2021. "Fostering the Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies: Evidence from the Licensing of the Transistor Patents," CEPR Discussion Papers 15713, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Nagler, Markus & Schnitzer, Monika & Watzinger, Martin, 2021. "Fostering the Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies: Evidence from the Licensing of the Transistor Patents," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 297, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
References listed on IDEAS
- Bresnahan, Timothy F. & Trajtenberg, M., 1995.
"General purpose technologies 'Engines of growth'?,"
Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 65(1), pages 83-108, January.
- Timothy F. Bresnahan & Manuel Trajtenberg, 1992. "General Purpose Technologies "Engines of Growth?"," NBER Working Papers 4148, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Trajtenberg, M. & Bresnahan, T.F., 1992. "General Purpose Technologies: "Engines of Growth"," Papers 16-92, Tel Aviv.
- Juan Alcácer & Michelle Gittelman, 2006. "Patent Citations as a Measure of Knowledge Flows: The Influence of Examiner Citations," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 88(4), pages 774-779, November.
- Josh Lerner & Marcin Strojwas & Jean Tirole, 2007.
"The design of patent pools: the determinants of licensing rules,"
RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 38(3), pages 610-625, September.
- Lerner, Josh & Strojwas, Marcin & Tirole, Jean, 2005. "The Design of Patent Pools: The Determinants of Licensing Rules," IDEI Working Papers 187, Institut d'Économie Industrielle (IDEI), Toulouse.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2016.
"Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets,"
Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 16(1), pages 53-87.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2015. "Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets," NBER Chapters, in: Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 16, pages 53-87, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2015. "Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from Health Care Markets," NBER Working Papers 21246, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jerry R. Green & Suzanne Scotchmer, 1995.
"On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation,"
RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 26(1), pages 20-33, Spring.
- Green, J.R. & Scotchmer, S., 1993. "On the Division of Profit in Sequential Innovation," Harvard Institute of Economic Research Working Papers 1638, Harvard - Institute of Economic Research.
- Kremer, Michael R., 1998. "Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation," Scholarly Articles 3693705, Harvard University Department of Economics.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2013.
"Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 121(1), pages 1-27.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2010. "Intellectual Property Rights and Innovation: Evidence from the Human Genome," NBER Working Papers 16213, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2023.
"What Happened to US Business Dynamism?,"
Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 131(8), pages 2059-2124.
- Akcigit, Ufuk & Ates, Sina T., 2019. "What Happened to U.S. Business Dynamism?," CEPR Discussion Papers 13669, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina Ates, 2019. "What Happened to the U.S. Business Dynamism?," 2019 Meeting Papers 150, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2020. "What Happened to U.S. Business Dynamism?," FEDS Notes 2020-02-14, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (U.S.).
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2019. "What Happened to U.S. Business Dynamism?," CESifo Working Paper Series 7854, CESifo.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2019. "What Happened to U.S. Business Dynamism?," NBER Working Papers 25756, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Boldrin,Michele & Levine,David K., 2010.
"Against Intellectual Monopoly,"
Cambridge Books,
Cambridge University Press, number 9780521127264, November.
- Boldrin,Michele & Levine,David K., 2008. "Against Intellectual Monopoly," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521879286, January.
- Michele Boldrin & David K Levine, 2008. "Against Intellectual Monopoly," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000002371, UCLA Department of Economics.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2021.
"Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory,"
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 13(1), pages 257-298, January.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2019. "Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory," NBER Working Papers 25755, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Ufuk Akcigit & Sina T. Ates, 2019. "Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory," CESifo Working Paper Series 7849, CESifo.
- Akcigit, Ufuk & Ates, Sina T., 2019. "Ten Facts on Declining Business Dynamism and Lessons from Endogenous Growth Theory," CEPR Discussion Papers 13668, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2017.
"How Do Patents Affect Research Investments?,"
Annual Review of Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 9(1), pages 441-469, September.
- Heidi L. Williams, 2017. "How Do Patents Affect Research Investments?," NBER Working Papers 23088, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Martin Watzinger & Thomas A. Fackler & Markus Nagler & Monika Schnitzer, 2020.
"How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 328-359, November.
- Martin Watzinger & Thomas Fackler & Markus Nagler & Monika Schnitzer, 2017. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," CESifo Working Paper Series 6351, CESifo.
- Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas A. & Nagler, Markus & Schnitzer, Monika, 2020. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," Munich Reprints in Economics 84713, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Schnitzer, Monika & Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas & Nagler, Markus, 2017. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," CEPR Discussion Papers 11793, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Iacus, Stefano & King, Gary & Porro, Giuseppe, 2009. "cem: Software for Coarsened Exact Matching," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 30(i09).
- Merges, Robert P. & Nelson, Richard R., 1994. "On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 1-24, September.
- Ron D. Katznelson & John Howells, 2015. "The myth of the early aviation patent hold-up—how a US government monopsony commandeered pioneer airplane patents," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 24(1), pages 1-64.
- Alberto Galasso, 2012. "Broad Cross‐License Negotiations," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(4), pages 873-911, December.
- Galasso, Alberto & Schankerman, Mark, 2015. "Patents and cumulative innovation: causal evidence from the courts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 61614, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Leonid Kogan & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Noah Stoffman, 2017.
"Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 132(2), pages 665-712.
- Leonid Kogan & Dimitris Papanikolaou & Amit Seru & Noah Stoffman, 2012. "Technological Innovation, Resource Allocation, and Growth," NBER Working Papers 17769, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Jeffrey L. Furman & Markus Nagler & Martin Watzinger, 2021.
"Disclosure and Subsequent Innovation: Evidence from the Patent Depository Library Program,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 239-270, November.
- Jeffrey L. Furman & Markus Nagler & Martin Watzinger, 2018. "Disclosure and Subsequent Innovation: Evidence from the Patent Depository Library Program," NBER Working Papers 24660, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Furman, Jeffrey L. & Nagler, Markus & Watzinger, Martin, 2019. "Disclosure and Subsequent Innovation: Evidence From the Patent Depository Library Program," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 136, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Petra Moser & Alessandra Voena, 2012.
"Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 102(1), pages 396-427, February.
- Petra Moser & Alessandra Voena, 2009. "Compulsory Licensing - Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act," NBER Working Papers 15598, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Petra Moser & Alessandra Voena, 2010. "Compulsory Licensing: Evidence from the Trading with the Enemy Act," Discussion Papers 09-026, Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research.
- Alcácer, Juan & Gittelman, Michelle & Sampat, Bhaven, 2009.
"Applicant and examiner citations in U.S. patents: An overview and analysis,"
Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 415-427, March.
- Juan Alcacer & Michelle Gittelman & Bhaven Sampat, 2008. "Applicant and Examiner Citations in US Patents: An Overview and Analysis," Harvard Business School Working Papers 09-016, Harvard Business School.
- Jovanovic, Boyan & Rousseau, Peter L., 2005.
"General Purpose Technologies,"
Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 18, pages 1181-1224,
Elsevier.
- Peter L. Rousseau & Boyan Jovanovic, 2004. "General Purpose Technologies," 2004 Meeting Papers 103, Society for Economic Dynamics.
- Boyan Jovanovic & Peter L. Rousseau, 2005. "General Purpose Technologies," NBER Working Papers 11093, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Daniel Holbrook & Wesley M. Cohen & David A. Hounshell & Steven Klepper, 2000. "The nature, sources, and consequences of firm differences in the early history of the semiconductor industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1017-1041, October.
- Murray, Fiona & Stern, Scott, 2007. "Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge?: An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 63(4), pages 648-687, August.
- Fiona E. Murray & Scott Stern, 2007. "Do Formal Intellectual Property Rights Hinder the Free Flow of Scientific Knowledge?: An Empirical Test of the Anti-Commons Hypothesis," NBER Chapters, in: Academic Science and Entrepreneurship: Dual Engines of Growth, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- George Selgin & John L. Turner, 2011. "Strong Steam, Weak Patents, or the Myth of Watt's Innovation-Blocking Monopoly, Exploded," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 54(4), pages 841-861.
- Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 67(3), pages 297-297.
- Joshua Lerner, 1994. "The Importance of Patent Scope: An Empirical Analysis," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 25(2), pages 319-333, Summer.
- David C. Mowery, 2011. "Federal Policy and the Development of Semiconductors, Computer Hardware, and Computer Software: A Policy Model for Climate Change R&D?," NBER Chapters, in: Accelerating Energy Innovation: Insights from Multiple Sectors, pages 159-188, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Michael Kremer, 1998.
"Patent Buyouts: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation,"
The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 113(4), pages 1137-1167.
- Michael Kremer, 1997. "Patent Buy-Outs: A Mechanism for Encouraging Innovation," NBER Working Papers 6304, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- William R. Kerr, 2008.
"Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion,"
The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 90(3), pages 518-537, August.
- William R. Kerr, 2005. "Ethnic Scientific Communities and International Technology Diffusion," Harvard Business School Working Papers 06-022, Harvard Business School, revised Apr 2007.
- Bhaven Sampat & Heidi L. Williams, 2019.
"How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 203-236, January.
- Bhaven Sampat & Heidi L. Williams, 2015. "How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome," NBER Working Papers 21666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nathan ROSENBERG, 2009.
"Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?,"
World Scientific Book Chapters, in: Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Studies On Science And The Innovation Process Selected Works of Nathan Rosenberg, chapter 11, pages 225-234,
World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd..
- Rosenberg, Nathan, 1990. "Why do firms do basic research (with their own money)?," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 165-174, April.
- Bresnahan, Timothy, 2010. "General Purpose Technologies," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 761-791, Elsevier.
- Dan Andrews & Chiara Criscuolo & Peter N. Gal, 2016. "The Best versus the Rest: The Global Productivity Slowdown, Divergence across Firms and the Role of Public Policy," OECD Productivity Working Papers 5, OECD Publishing.
- Gaessler, Fabian & Harhoff, Dietmar & Sorg, Stefan, 2019.
"Bargaining Failure and Freedom to Operate: Re-evaluating the Effect of Patents on Cumulative Innovation,"
Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series
220, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Harhoff, Dietmar & Gaessler, Fabian & Sorg, Stefan, 2019. "Bargaining Failure and Freedom to Operate: Re-evaluating the Effect of Patents on Cumulative Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13969, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Richard Nelson, 1962. "Introduction to "The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors"," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 1-16, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Lanjouw, Jean O & Schankerman, Mark, 2004. "Protecting Intellectual Property Rights: Are Small Firms Handicapped?," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 47(1), pages 45-74, April.
- Alberto Galasso & Mark Schankerman, 2015. "Patents and Cumulative Innovation: Causal Evidence from the Courts," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(1), pages 317-369.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Watzinger, Martin & Schnitzer, Monika, 2022.
"The Breakup of the Bell System and its Impact on US Innovation,"
Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series
341, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Watzinger, Martin & Schnitzer, Monika, 2022. "The Breakup of the Bell System and its Impact on US Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 17635, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Diane Coyle, 2021. "The idea of productivity," Working Papers 003, The Productivity Institute.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Martin Watzinger & Thomas A. Fackler & Markus Nagler & Monika Schnitzer, 2020.
"How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree,"
American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 12(4), pages 328-359, November.
- Schnitzer, Monika & Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas & Nagler, Markus, 2017. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," CEPR Discussion Papers 11793, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Martin Watzinger & Thomas Fackler & Markus Nagler & Monika Schnitzer, 2017. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," CESifo Working Paper Series 6351, CESifo.
- Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas A. & Nagler, Markus & Schnitzer, Monika, 2020. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation: Bell Labs and the 1956 Consent Decree," Munich Reprints in Economics 84713, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
- Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas A. & Nagler, Markus, 2017. "How Antitrust Enforcement Can Spur Innovation," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 4, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Gaessler, Fabian & Harhoff, Dietmar & Sorg, Stefan, 2019.
"Bargaining Failure and Freedom to Operate: Re-evaluating the Effect of Patents on Cumulative Innovation,"
Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series
220, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Harhoff, Dietmar & Gaessler, Fabian & Sorg, Stefan, 2019. "Bargaining Failure and Freedom to Operate: Re-evaluating the Effect of Patents on Cumulative Innovation," CEPR Discussion Papers 13969, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Fabian Gaessler & Dietmar Harhoff & Stefan Sorg & Georg von Graevenitz, 2024. "Patents, Freedom to Operate, and Follow-on Innovation: Evidence from Post-Grant Opposition," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 494, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Robin Mamrak, 2023. "Antitrust and (Foreign) Innovation: Evidence from the Xerox Case," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 396, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
- Nancy Gallini, 2017.
"Do patents work? Thickets, trolls and antibiotic resistance,"
Canadian Journal of Economics, Canadian Economics Association, vol. 50(4), pages 893-926, November.
- Nancy Gallini, 2017. "Do patents work? Thickets, trolls and antibiotic resistance," Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d'économique, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(4), pages 893-926, November.
- Alberto Galasso & Mark Schankerman, 2015. "Patent Rights, Innovation and Firm Exit," NBER Working Papers 21769, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Nagler, Markus & Watzinger, Martin & Fackler, Thomas & Schnitzer, Monika, 2016. "Antitrust, Patents, and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence from Bell Labs," VfS Annual Conference 2016 (Augsburg): Demographic Change 145580, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
- Schankerman, Mark & Galasso, Alberto, 2015. "Patents Rights, Innovation and Firm Exit," CEPR Discussion Papers 10968, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
- Mark Schankerman, 2015. "Patents Rights and Innovation by Small and Large Firms," STICERD - Economics of Industry Papers 54, Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines, LSE.
- Aydogmus, Ozgur, 2022. "Increasing returns and path dependence in knowledge creation and their effects on the dynamics of patent pools," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 467-477.
- Yin, Nina, 2023. "Pharmaceuticals, incremental innovation and market exclusivity," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
- Freilich, Janet & Shahshahani, Sepehr, 2023. "Measuring follow-on innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(9).
- Bhaven Sampat & Heidi L. Williams, 2019.
"How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome,"
American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(1), pages 203-236, January.
- Bhaven Sampat & Heidi L. Williams, 2015. "How Do Patents Affect Follow-On Innovation? Evidence from the Human Genome," NBER Working Papers 21666, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Galasso, Alberto & Schankerman, Mark, 2013. "Patents and cumulative innovation: causal evidence from the courts," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 51539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Gambardella, Alfonso, 2023. "Private and social functions of patents: Innovation, markets, and new firms," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(7).
- Daniel P. Gross, 2023.
"The Hidden Costs of Securing Innovation: The Manifold Impacts of Compulsory Invention Secrecy,"
Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(4), pages 2318-2338, April.
- Daniel P. Gross, 2019. "The Hidden Costs of Securing Innovation: The Manifold Impacts of Compulsory Invention Secrecy," NBER Working Papers 25545, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
- Kwon, Seokbeom & Marco, Alan C., 2021. "Can antitrust law enforcement spur innovation? Antitrust regulation of patent consolidation and its impact on follow-on innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(9).
- Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2019.
"Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence from Trade Secrets Laws,"
CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series
crctr224_2019_119v1, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany.
- Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2021. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From Trade Secrets Laws," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2024_119v3, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Sep 2024.
- Bernhard Ganglmair & Imke Reimers, 2021. "Visibility of Technology and Cumulative Innovation: Evidence From Trade Secrets Laws," CRC TR 224 Discussion Paper Series crctr224_2021_119v3, University of Bonn and University of Mannheim, Germany, revised Sep 2024.
- Ganglmair, Bernhard & Reimers, Imke, 2019. "Visibility of technology and cumulative innovation: Evidence from trade secrets laws," ZEW Discussion Papers 19-035, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
- Filippo Mezzanotti, 2021. "Roadblock to Innovation: The Role of Patent Litigation in Corporate R&D," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7362-7390, December.
More about this item
JEL classification:
- O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights
- O33 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences; Diffusion Processes
- O34 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights - - - Intellectual Property and Intellectual Capital
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:jindec:v:70:y:2022:i:4:p:838-866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0022-1821 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.