IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/nbr/nberch/10111.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Incentives, Motives, and Response Bias

In: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 3, number 2

Author

Listed:
  • Charles Cannell
  • Ramon Henson

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Charles Cannell & Ramon Henson, 1974. "Incentives, Motives, and Response Bias," NBER Chapters, in: Annals of Economic and Social Measurement, Volume 3, number 2, pages 307-317, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    • Handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:10111
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c10111.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ferber, Robert, et al, 1969. "Validation of a National Survey of Consumer Financial Characteristics: Savings Accounts," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 51(4), pages 436-444, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tim Johnson & Nick Obradovich, 2022. "Measuring an artificial intelligence agent's trust in humans using machine incentives," Papers 2212.13371, arXiv.org.
    2. Marco Francesconi, 2005. "An evaluation of the childhood family structure measures from the sixth wave of the British Household Panel Survey," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 168(3), pages 539-566, July.
    3. Iannario, Maria & Manisera, Marica & Zuccolotto, Paola, 2015. "The treatment of don't know responses in the consumers' perceptions: a survey in the agri-food sector," 143rd Joint EAAE/AAEA Seminar, March 25-27, 2015, Naples, Italy 202704, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    4. Philipson, Tomas & Malani, Anup, 1999. "Measurement errors: A principal investigator-agent approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 273-298, August.
    5. Islam, Shahidul & Tanasiuk, Evan, 2012. "Differential response on pre- and post-disclosed committed inducements in a face to face interview," MPRA Paper 107276, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2012.
    6. Maria Iannario & Marica Manisera & Paola Zuccolotto, 2017. "Treatment of “don’t know” responses in the consumers’ perceptions about sustainability in the agri-food sector," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 765-778, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. B. Douglas Bernheim, 1987. "Dissaving after Retirement: Testing the Pure Life Cycle Hypothesis," NBER Chapters, in: Issues in Pension Economics, pages 237-280, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Martin H. David & Christopher R. Bollinger, 2005. "I didn't tell, and I won't tell: dynamic response error in the SIPP," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 20(4), pages 563-569.
    3. Philipson, Tomas & Malani, Anup, 1999. "Measurement errors: A principal investigator-agent approach," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 273-298, August.
    4. Webley, Paul & Nyhus, Ellen K., 2013. "Economic socialization, saving and assets in European young adults," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 19-30.
    5. Daniel Radner, 1989. "The Wealth of the Aged and Nonaged, 1984," NBER Chapters, in: The Measurement of Saving, Investment, and Wealth, pages 645-688, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. E. Scott Maynes & Arthur J. Rolnick, 1975. "Nonreporting of savings accounts in sample savings: causes and correlates," Working Papers 46, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:nbr:nberch:10111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/nberrus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.