IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/15126_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Conclusion: principles and standards for benefit–cost analysis

In: Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Richard O. Zerbe
  • Tyler Blake Davis
  • Nancy Garland
  • Tyler Scott

Abstract

Benefit–cost analysis informs which policies or programs most benefit society when implemented by governments and institutions around the world. This volume brings together leading researchers and practitioners to recommend strategies and standards to improve the consistency and credibility of such analyses, assisting analysts of all types in achieving a greater uniformity of practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard O. Zerbe & Tyler Blake Davis & Nancy Garland & Tyler Scott, 2013. "Conclusion: principles and standards for benefit–cost analysis," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 11, pages 364-443, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:15126_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781781953433.00017.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jonathan P. Caulkins, 2002. "Using models that incorporate uncertainty," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(3), pages 486-491.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kip Viscusi, W. & Gayer, Ted, 2016. "Rational Benefit Assessment for an Irrational World: Toward a Behavioral Transfer Test1," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 69-91, April.
    2. Jones, Michael, 2017. "The Effect of Job Readiness Programs on Criminal Behavior," MPRA Paper 81908, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Farrow Scott, 2013. "How (Not) to Lie with Benefit-Cost Analysis," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 45-50, December.
    4. Burgess David F. & Zerbe Richard O., 2013. "The most appropriate discount rate," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 4(3), pages 391-400, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Musah Mohammed Saeed & Mahalakshmi Mudliar & Manisha Kumari, 2023. "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance nexus: Empirical evidence from Ghana," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(6), pages 2799-2815, November.
    2. Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), 2013. "Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15126.
    3. Joseph H. Cook, 2013. "Principles and standards for benefit–cost analysis of public health preparedness and pandemic mitigation programs," Chapters, in: Scott O. Farrow & Richard Zerbe, Jr. (ed.), Principles and Standards for Benefit–Cost Analysis, chapter 3, pages 110-152, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Eugene Bardach, 2004. "Presidential address-The extrapolation problem: How can we learn from the experience of others?," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(2), pages 205-220.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economics and Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:15126_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.