IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pwi483.html
   My authors  Follow this author

James Wible

Personal Details

First Name:James
Middle Name:
Last Name:Wible
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pwi483
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Economics Department
University of New Hampshire

Durham, New Hampshire (United States)
http://paulcollege.unh.edu/departments/economics
RePEc:edi:edunhus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Wible, James R. & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?," OSF Preprints 5nwsa, Center for Open Science.
  2. James R. Wible & Kevin D. Hoover, "undated". "Mathematical Economics Comes to America: Charles S. Peirce's Engagement with Cournot's Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses," Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series 2013-12 4Creation-Date: 2, Center for the History of Political Economy.

Articles

  1. James R. Wible & Kevin D. Hoover, 2021. "The economics of trade liberalization: Charles S. Peirce and the Spanish Treaty of 1884," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(2), pages 229-248, March.
  2. Wible, James R., 2021. "Why Economics Is An Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’S View Of Economics Have Been So Different Than Peirce’S?," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 43(3), pages 350-377, September.
  3. James R. Wible, 2020. "C. S. Peirce’s theory of abductive expectations," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 2-44, January.
  4. James R. Wible, 2018. "A Peircean Perspective on Integrating Economics and Evolutionary Theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 105-111, January.
  5. Altug Yalcintas & James R. Wible, 2016. "Scientific misconduct and research ethics in economics: an introduction," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 1-6, March.
  6. James R. Wible, 2016. "Scientific misconduct and the responsible conduct of research in science and economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 7-32, March.
  7. Wible, James R. & Hoover, Kevin D., 2015. "Mathematical Economics Comes To America: Charles S. Peirce’S Engagement With Cournot’S Recherches Sur Les Principes Mathématiques De La Théorie Des Richesses," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 511-536, December.
  8. James R. Wible, 2011. "Sufficient Reason: Volitional Pragmatism and the Meaning of Economic Institutions, By DANIEL W. BROMLEY," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 78(310), pages 391-392, April.
  9. James R Wible, 2011. "Theoretical Foundations of Law and Economics, by Mark D. White," Eastern Economic Journal, Palgrave Macmillan;Eastern Economic Association, vol. 37(4), pages 571-573.
  10. James R. Wible, 2009. "Donald R. Stabile, Economics, Competition, and Academia: An Intellectual History of Sophism versus Virtue, Cheltenham (uk), Edward Elgar, 2007, pp. viii-148," History of Economic Ideas, Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa - Roma, vol. 17(1), pages 225-228.
  11. James Wible, 2005. "Towards a process conception of rationality in economics and science," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 465-481.
  12. Wible James, 1998. "THE ECONOMICS OF SCIENCE, METHODOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY AS IF ECONOMICS REALLY MATTER: Compte rendu de lecture par Emmanuel Martin," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 555-572, December.
  13. James Wible, 1994. "Book Reviews," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(2), pages 314-329.
  14. James Wible, 1994. "Charles Sanders Peirce's economy of research," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 135-160.
  15. James R. Wible, 1987. "Criticism and the Validity of the Special-Case Interpretation of Friedman’s Essay: Reply to Webb," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 430-440, March.
  16. James R. Wible, 1985. "Institutional Economics, Positive Economics, Pragmatism, and Recent Philosophy of Science: Reply to Liebhafsky and Liebhafsky," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(4), pages 984-995, December.
  17. James R. Wible, 1984. "An Epistemic Critique of Rational Expectations and the Neoclassical Macroeconomic Research Program," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 269-281, December.
  18. James R. Wible, 1984. "The Instrumentalisms of Dewey and Friedman," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 1049-1070, December.
  19. James R. Wible, 1982. "The Rational Expectations Tautologies," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 199-207, December.

Chapters

  1. James Wible, 2009. "Teaching Economics Students as if they are Geniuses," Chapters, in: David Colander & KimMarie McGoldrick (ed.), Educating Economists, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. James R. Wible & Kevin D. Hoover, "undated". "Mathematical Economics Comes to America: Charles S. Peirce's Engagement with Cournot's Recherches sur les Principes Mathematiques de la Theorie des Richesses," Center for the History of Political Economy Working Paper Series 2013-12 4Creation-Date: 2, Center for the History of Political Economy.

    Cited by:

    1. Subhendu Bhattacharyya, 2021. "A small step towards unification of economics and physics," Mind & Society: Cognitive Studies in Economics and Social Sciences, Springer;Fondazione Rosselli, vol. 20(1), pages 69-84, June.

Articles

  1. Altug Yalcintas & James R. Wible, 2016. "Scientific misconduct and research ethics in economics: an introduction," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 1-6, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.

  2. James R. Wible, 2016. "Scientific misconduct and the responsible conduct of research in science and economics," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 74(1), pages 7-32, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Cox, Adam & Craig, Russell & Tourish, Dennis, 2018. "Retraction statements and research malpractice in economics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 924-935.
    2. Josephson, Anna & Michler, Jeffrey D., 2018. "Viewpoint: Beasts of the field? Ethics in agricultural and applied economics," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-11.

  3. Wible, James R. & Hoover, Kevin D., 2015. "Mathematical Economics Comes To America: Charles S. Peirce’S Engagement With Cournot’S Recherches Sur Les Principes Mathématiques De La Théorie Des Richesses," Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Cambridge University Press, vol. 37(4), pages 511-536, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Wible James, 1998. "THE ECONOMICS OF SCIENCE, METHODOLOGY AND EPISTEMOLOGY AS IF ECONOMICS REALLY MATTER: Compte rendu de lecture par Emmanuel Martin," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 8(4), pages 555-572, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Marek Loužek, 2012. "Ekonomie vědy - naděje, nebo léčka? [Economics of Science - A Hope or a Pitfall?]," Politická ekonomie, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2012(4), pages 536-550.
    2. Roger Koppl & William Luther, 2012. "Hayek, Keynes, and modern macroeconomics," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 25(3), pages 223-241, September.
    3. D. Wade Hands, 2002. "Economic methodology is dead - long live economic methodology: thirteen theses on the new economic methodology," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(1), pages 49-63.
    4. Esther-Mirjam Sent, 1999. "Economics of science: survey and suggestions," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 95-124.
    5. Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "Veblen’s evolutionary methodology and its implications for heterodox economics in the calculable future," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 2(2), pages 277-295, July.
    6. Altuð YALÇINTAÞ, 2015. "James R. Wible, The Economics of Science: Methodology as if Economics Really Mattered," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 2(1s), pages 223-227, May.
    7. Nicola Lacetera & Lorenzo Zirulia, 2011. "The Economics of Scientific Misconduct," The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, Oxford University Press, vol. 27(3), pages 568-603.
    8. Yalcintas, Altug, 2010. "The ‘Coase Theorem’ vs. Coase theorem proper: How an error emerged and why it remained uncorrected so long," MPRA Paper 37936, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Mark Blaug, 2001. "No History of Ideas, Please, We're Economists," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 15(1), pages 145-164, Winter.
    10. Vanberg, Viktor J., 2008. "The 'science-as-market' analogy: a constitutional economics perspective," Freiburg Discussion Papers on Constitutional Economics 08/1, Walter Eucken Institut e.V..
    11. Roger Koppl, 2011. "Against representative agent methodology," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(1), pages 43-55, March.
    12. David Levy & Sandra Peart, 2012. "Tullock on motivated inquiry: expert-induced uncertainty disguised as risk," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 152(1), pages 163-180, July.
    13. Glenna, Leland L. & Welsh, Rick & Ervin, David & Lacy, William B. & Biscotti, Dina, 2011. "Commercial science, scientists' values, and university biotechnology research agendas," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 957-968, September.
    14. Boldyrev, I., 2011. "Economic Methodology Today: a Review of Major Contributions," Journal of the New Economic Association, New Economic Association, issue 9, pages 47-70.
    15. Arne HEISE, 2016. "‘Why has economics turned out this way?’ A socio-economic note on the explanation of monism in economics," The Journal of Philosophical Economics, Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies, The Journal of Philosophical Economics, vol. 10(1), pages 81-101, November.
    16. Le Maux, Benoît & Necker, Sarah & Rocaboy, Yvon, 2019. "Cheat or perish? A theory of scientific customs," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(9), pages 1-1.
    17. Follert, Florian & Naumann, Chantal & Thieme, Lutz, 2020. "Between scientific publication and public perception: Some economic remarks on the allocation of time in science," Working Papers of the European Institute for Socioeconomics 34, European Institute for Socioeconomics (EIS), Saarbrücken.
    18. Butos William N. & McQuade Thomas J., 2012. "Nonneutralities in Science Funding: Direction, Destabilization, and Distortion," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 18(1), pages 1-28, October.
    19. Jesú s P. Zamora Bonilla, 1999. "Verisimilitude and the scientific strategy of economic theory," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(3), pages 331-350.
    20. Kevin D. Hoover & Mark V. Siegler, 2005. "Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics," Econometrics 0511018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    21. Kiri, Bralind & Lacetera, Nicola & Zirulia, Lorenzo, 2018. "Above a swamp: A theory of high-quality scientific production," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(5), pages 827-839.
    22. Altug Yalcintas, 2013. "The Problem of Epistemic Cost: Why Do Economists Not Change Their Minds (About the “Coase Theorem”)?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(5), pages 1131-1157, November.
    23. Thomas Leonard, 2001. "Reflection on rules in science: an invisible-hand perspective," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 141-168.
    24. Bruno Frey, 2006. "How Influential is Economics?," De Economist, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 295-311, June.
    25. Bonaccorsi, Andrea & Vargas, Juan, 2010. "Proliferation dynamics in new sciences," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(8), pages 1034-1050, October.

  5. James Wible, 1994. "Charles Sanders Peirce's economy of research," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 135-160.

    Cited by:

    1. Butos William N. & Boettke Peter J., 2002. "Kirznerian Entrepreneurship and The Economics of Science," Journal des Economistes et des Etudes Humaines, De Gruyter, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, March.
    2. Wible, James R. & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?," OSF Preprints 5nwsa, Center for Open Science.
    3. Kevin D. Hoover & Mark V. Siegler, 2005. "Sound and Fury: McCloskey and Significance Testing in Economics," Econometrics 0511018, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Robert Griffin, 1998. "What Veblen Owed to Peirce—The Social Theory of Logic," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 733-757, September.

  6. James R. Wible, 1984. "The Instrumentalisms of Dewey and Friedman," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(4), pages 1049-1070, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Steven M. Shugan, 2007. "—It's the Findings, Stupid, Not the Assumptions," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 449-459, 07-08.
    2. Altuð YALÇINTAÞ, 2015. "James R. Wible, The Economics of Science: Methodology as if Economics Really Mattered," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, KSP Journals, vol. 2(1s), pages 223-227, May.

  7. James R. Wible, 1982. "The Rational Expectations Tautologies," Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(2), pages 199-207, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Alessandro Morselli, 2023. "The Modernity of Keynesian Thinking on Economic Policy from an Institutional Perspective," HISTORY OF ECONOMIC THOUGHT AND POLICY, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2023(2), pages 67-86.
    2. James Wible, 2005. "Towards a process conception of rationality in economics and science," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(3), pages 465-481.

Chapters

    Sorry, no citations of chapters recorded.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (1) 2020-10-26
  2. NEP-HIS: Business, Economic and Financial History (1) 2020-10-26
  3. NEP-HME: Heterodox Microeconomics (1) 2020-10-26
  4. NEP-HPE: History and Philosophy of Economics (1) 2020-10-26
  5. NEP-PKE: Post Keynesian Economics (1) 2020-10-26

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, James Wible should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.