IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/mes/jeciss/v32y1998i3p733-757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What Veblen Owed to Peirce—The Social Theory of Logic

Author

Listed:
  • Robert Griffin

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert Griffin, 1998. "What Veblen Owed to Peirce—The Social Theory of Logic," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(3), pages 733-757, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:32:y:1998:i:3:p:733-757
    DOI: 10.1080/00213624.1998.11506077
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506077
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00213624.1998.11506077?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Wible, 1994. "Charles Sanders Peirce's economy of research," Journal of Economic Methodology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 1(1), pages 135-160.
    2. Veblen, Thorstein, 1904. "Theory of Business Enterprise," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number veblen1904.
    3. Alan W. Dyer, 1986. "Veblen on Scientific Creativity: The Influence of Charles S. Peirce," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 21-41, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wible, James R. & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?," OSF Preprints 5nwsa, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Altug Yalcintas, 2013. "The Problem of Epistemic Cost: Why Do Economists Not Change Their Minds (About the “Coase Theorem”)?," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(5), pages 1131-1157, November.
    2. Wible, James R. & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Why Economics is an Evolutionary, Mathematical Science: How Could Veblen’s View Of Economics Been So Different Than C. S. Peirce’s?," OSF Preprints 5nwsa, Center for Open Science.
    3. Tae-Hee Jo, 2013. "Saving Private Business Enterprises," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 447-467, April.
    4. Richard Nielsen, 2013. "Whistle-Blowing Methods for Navigating Within and Helping Reform Regulatory Institutions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 112(3), pages 385-395, February.
    5. Jack High, 2011. "Dr. Anderson and the Austrians: Price formation as a cumulative process," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 24(2), pages 199-211, June.
    6. Valentinov, Vladislav, 2023. "Stakeholder theory: Toward a classical institutional economics perspective," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 188(1), pages 75-88.
    7. Geoffrey M. Hodgson, 2003. "Darwinism and Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(1), pages 85-97, March.
    8. Alexander Antony Dunlap, 2015. "The Expanding Techniques of Progress: Agricultural Biotechnology and UN-REDD+," Review of Social Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 73(1), pages 89-112, March.
    9. Viano Francesca Lidia, 2002. "Guesswork and knowledge in evolutionary economics: verblen revisited," CESMEP Working Papers 200205, University of Turin.
    10. Yochanan Shachmurove, 2012. "Failing Institutions Are at the Core of the U.S. Financial Crisis," PIER Working Paper Archive 12-040, Penn Institute for Economic Research, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania.
    11. Lee, Frederic, 2011. "Old controversy revisited: pricing, market structure, and competition," MPRA Paper 30490, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Jan Toporowski, 2017. "Kalecki on Technology and Military Keynesianism," SPRU Working Paper Series 2017-22, SPRU - Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex Business School.
    13. Iavor Marangozov, 2005. "From Practice to Theory of the International Joint Ventures," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 2, pages 44-77.
    14. repec:pra:mprapa:39569 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Blair Fix, 2019. "Energy, hierarchy and the origin of inequality," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-32, April.
    16. Hugh Rockoff, 2008. "Great Fortunes of the Gilded Age," NBER Working Papers 14555, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    17. Donald R. Stabile & Andrew F. Kozak, 2012. "Markets, Planning and the Moral Economy," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 14979.
    18. Marie-Laure Salles-Djelic & Sigrid Quack, 2004. "Governing Globalization – Bringing Institutions Back In," Post-Print hal-01892007, HAL.
    19. Nitzan, Jonathan & Bichler, Shimshon, 2019. "CasP's 'Differential Accumulation' versus Veblen's 'Differential Advantage' (Revised and Expanded)," Working Papers on Capital as Power 2019/01, Capital As Power - Toward a New Cosmology of Capitalism.
    20. Karyotis, Catherine & Alijani, Sharam, 2016. "Soft commodities and the global financial crisis: Implications for the economy, resources and institutions," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 350-359.
    21. Tae-Hee Jo, 2021. "A Veblenian Critique of Nelson and Winter’s Evolutionary Theory," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1101-1117, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:mes:jeciss:v:32:y:1998:i:3:p:733-757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/MJEI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.