IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pne227.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Thomas Neumann

Personal Details

First Name:Thomas
Middle Name:
Last Name:Neumann
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pne227
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]

Affiliation

Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaft
Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg

Magdeburg, Germany
http://www.fww.ovgu.de/
RePEc:edi:fwmagde (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Chapters

Working papers

  1. Bonev, Pavlin & Egbert, Henrik & Neumann, Thomas, 2014. "Examining Entrepreneurial Potential," MPRA Paper 60493, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Pavlin Bonev & Henrik Egbert & Thomas Neumann, 2015. "Examining Entrepreneurial Potential," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2015-02, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Feb 2015.
  2. Egbert, Henrik & Neumann, Thomas & Rasmus, Anke, 2014. "Matchingtools und Matchingprozesse im Kontext von Junior und Senior Entrepreneuren [Matching Tools and Processes in the Context of Junior and Senior Entrepreneurship]," MPRA Paper 54829, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Eike Kroll & Ralf Morgenstern & Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2012. "Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses - Experimental evidence of Inequality Aversion in the Nash bargaining game," FEMM Working Papers 120014, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
  4. Siegfried K. Berninghaus & Sven Haller & Tyll Krüger & Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2012. "Risk Attitude, Beliefs, and Information in a Corruption Game - An Experimental Analysis," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-033, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
  5. Siegried K. Berninghaus & Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2011. "Learning in Networks - An Experimental Study using Stationary Concepts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-048, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.
  6. Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2009. "Do Players’ Beliefs or Risk Attitudes Determine The Equilibrium Selections in 2x2 Coordination Games?," FEMM Working Papers 09024, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.

Articles

  1. Carolin Winkelmann & Anna Mezentseva & Bodo Vogt & Thomas Neumann, 2023. "Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Liver and Gastrointestinal Cancer Randomized Controlled Trials," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(13), pages 1-13, July.
  2. Ulrike Baum & Frauke Kühn & Marcel Lichters & Anne-Katrin Baum & Renate Deike & Hermann Hinrichs & Thomas Neumann, 2022. "Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring—An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-22, October.
  3. Toan L. D. Huynh & Marc Oliver Rieger & Mei Wang & David Berens & Duy-Linh Bui & Hung-Ling Chen & Tobias Peter Emering & Sen Geng & Yang Liu-Gerhards & Thomas Neumann & Thanh Dac Nguyen & Thong Trung , 2022. "Cheating, Trust and Social Norms: Data from Germany, Vietnam, China, Taiwan, and Japan," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-9, September.
  4. Thomas Neumann & Sabrina Kierspel & Ivo Windrich & Roger Berger & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "How to Split Gains and Losses? Experimental Evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
  5. Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2017. "The Impact of Previous Action on Bargaining—An Experiment on the Emergence of Preferences for Fairness Norms," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, August.
  6. Pavlin Bonev & Henrik Egbert & Thomas Neumann, 2016. "Examining Entrepreneurial Potential," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, September.
  7. Kroll, Eike B. & Morgenstern, Ralf & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2014. "Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses – Experimental evidence of equal split in the Nash bargaining game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 261-272.
  8. Siegfried K. Berninghaus & Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2014. "Learning in Networks—An Experimental Study Using Stationary Concepts," Games, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
  9. Berninghaus, Siegfried K. & Haller, Sven & Krüger, Tyll & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2013. "Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 46-60.

Chapters

  1. Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "Equilibrium Selection in Coordination Games: An Experimental Study of the Role of Higher Order Beliefs in Strategic Decisions," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Andreas Fink & Armin Fügenschuh & Martin Josef Geiger (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2016, pages 209-215, Springer.
  2. Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Natalia Kliewer & Jan Fabian Ehmke & Ralf Borndörfer (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2017, pages 287-292, Springer.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Egbert, Henrik & Neumann, Thomas & Rasmus, Anke, 2014. "Matchingtools und Matchingprozesse im Kontext von Junior und Senior Entrepreneuren [Matching Tools and Processes in the Context of Junior and Senior Entrepreneurship]," MPRA Paper 54829, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Bonev, Pavlin & Egbert, Henrik & Neumann, Thomas, 2014. "Examining Entrepreneurial Potential," MPRA Paper 60493, University Library of Munich, Germany.

  2. Siegfried K. Berninghaus & Sven Haller & Tyll Krüger & Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2012. "Risk Attitude, Beliefs, and Information in a Corruption Game - An Experimental Analysis," Jena Economics Research Papers 2012-033, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    Cited by:

    1. Ye-Feng Chen & Shu-Guang Jiang & Marie Claire Villeval, 2015. "The Tragedy of Corruption Corruption as a social dilemma," Working Papers halshs-01236660, HAL.
    2. Anna Kowalska-Pyzalska & Katarzyna Maciejowska & Katarzyna Sznajd-Weron & Karol Suszczynski & Rafal Weron, 2013. "Turning green: Agent-based modeling of the adoption of dynamic electricity tariffs," HSC Research Reports HSC/13/10, Hugo Steinhaus Center, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology.
    3. Chen, Yefeng & Jiang, Shuguang & Villeval, Marie Claire, 2016. "The Tragedy of Corruption," IZA Discussion Papers 10175, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    4. Carsten J. Crede & Liang Lu, 2016. "The effects of endogenous enforcement on strategic uncertainty and cartel deterrence," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Behavioural and Experimental Social Science (CBESS) 16-08, School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    5. Manouchehr Mokhtari, 2016. "Affordable Health Care," Journal of Family and Economic Issues, Springer, vol. 37(2), pages 135-139, June.
    6. Leonidas Koutsougeras & Manuel Santos & Fei Xu, 2019. "Corruption and Adverse Selection," SciencePo Working papers hal-03393076, HAL.
    7. Abatemarco, Antonio & Cascavilla, Alessandro & Dell’Anno, Roberto & Morone, Andrea, 2023. "Maximal Fines and Corruption: An Experimental Study on Illegal Waste Disposal," MPRA Paper 118733, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Fišar, Miloš & Kubák, Matúš & Špalek, Jiři & Tremewan, James, 2016. "Gender differences in beliefs and actions in a framed corruption experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 69-82.
    9. Alekseev, Aleksandr & Charness, Gary & Gneezy, Uri, 2017. "Experimental methods: When and why contextual instructions are important," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 48-59.
    10. Sokolovska, Olena & Sokolovskyi, Dmytro, 2015. "Tax evasion as a determinant of corruption: a game-theoretical analysis," MPRA Paper 66423, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    11. Maria Vittoria Levati & Chiara Nardi, 2019. "The power of words in a petty corruption experiment," Working Papers 18/2019, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    12. Joanne Peryman & David Kelsey, 2021. "Ambiguity when playing coordination games across cultures," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 485-505, May.
    13. Mokhtari, Manouchehr & Ashtari, Mamak, 2012. "Reducing informal payments in the health care system: Evidence from a large patient satisfaction survey," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 23(2), pages 189-200.
    14. Ferrali, Romain, 2020. "Partners in crime? Corruption as a criminal network," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 319-353.
    15. Roel van Veldhuizen, 2012. "The Influence of Wages on Public Officials' Corruptibility: A Laboratory Investigation," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 12-038/1, Tinbergen Institute.
    16. Djawadi, Behnud Mir & Fahr, René, 2013. "The Impact of Risk Perception and Risk Attitudes on Corrupt Behavior: Evidence from a Petty Corruption Experiment," IZA Discussion Papers 7383, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    17. Rajiv Verma & Saurabh Gupta & Regina Birner, 2023. "What do (future) civil servants think of bribery and corruption? Evidence from India," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(3), May.
    18. Jin Zheng & Arthur Schram & Gönül Doğan, 2021. "Friend or foe? Social ties in bribery and corruption," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 24(3), pages 854-882, September.
    19. W. C. Abram & K. Noray, 2018. "Political Corruption and Public Activism: An Evolutionary Game-Theoretic Analysis," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, March.
    20. Boly, Amadou & Gillanders, Robert, 2018. "Anti-corruption policy making, discretionary power and institutional quality: An experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 314-327.
    21. Thomas Giel & Sören Dallmeyer & Daniel Memmert & Christoph Breuer, 2023. "Corruption and Self-Sabotage in Sporting Competitions – An Experimental Approach to Match-Fixing Behavior and the Influence of Deterrence Factors," Journal of Sports Economics, , vol. 24(4), pages 497-525, May.
    22. Harri, Ardian & Zhllima, Edvin & Imami, Drini & Coatney, Kalyn T., 2020. "Effects of subject pool culture and institutional environment on corruption: Experimental evidence from Albania," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(2).
    23. Koustougeras, Leonidas & Santos, Manuel & Xu, Fei, 2024. "Corruption: Outbribing the Competition," Umeå Economic Studies 1028, Umeå University, Department of Economics.

  3. Siegried K. Berninghaus & Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2011. "Learning in Networks - An Experimental Study using Stationary Concepts," Jena Economics Research Papers 2011-048, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena.

    Cited by:

    1. Cartwright, Edward & Singh, Thomas B., 2018. "Observation and contagion effects in cooperation: An experimental investigation," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 151-160.
    2. Edward Cartwright & Anna Stepanova, 2017. "Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 46(4), pages 1163-1191, November.

  4. Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2009. "Do Players’ Beliefs or Risk Attitudes Determine The Equilibrium Selections in 2x2 Coordination Games?," FEMM Working Papers 09024, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.

    Cited by:

    1. Berninghaus, Siegfried K. & Haller, Sven & Krüger, Tyll & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2010. "Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a corruption game: An experimental analysis," Working Paper Series in Economics 6, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    2. Joanne Peryman & David Kelsey, 2021. "Ambiguity when playing coordination games across cultures," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 90(3), pages 485-505, May.
    3. Bosworth, Steven J., 2013. "Social capital and equilibrium selection in Stag Hunt games," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 11-20.
    4. Brocas, Isabelle & Carrillo, Juan & Kendall, Ryan, 2017. "Stress induces contextual blindness in lotteries and coordination games," CEPR Discussion Papers 12254, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    5. Drechsler, Martin, 2023. "Improving models of coordination incentives for biodiversity conservation by fitting a multi-agent simulation model to a lab experiment," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    6. Manja Gärtner & Robert Östling & Sebastian Tebbe, 2023. "Do we all coordinate in the long run?," Journal of the Economic Science Association, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 9(1), pages 16-33, June.
    7. Büyükboyacı, Mürüvvet, 2014. "Risk attitudes and the stag-hunt game," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 124(3), pages 323-325.

Articles

  1. Thomas Neumann & Sabrina Kierspel & Ivo Windrich & Roger Berger & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "How to Split Gains and Losses? Experimental Evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Ravetti, Chiara & Sarr, Mare & Munene, Daniel & Swanson, Tim, 2019. "Discrimination and favouritism among South African workers: Ethnic identity and union membership," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    2. François Cochard & Alexandre Flage & Gilles Grolleau & Angela Sutan, 2020. "Are individuals more generous in loss contexts?," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 55(4), pages 845-866, December.
    3. Cochard, François & Flage, Alexandre, 2024. "Sharing losses in dictator and ultimatum games: A meta-analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    4. Benistant, Julien & Suchon, Rémi, 2021. "It does (not) get better: Reference income violation and altruism," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    5. Antonios Avgeris & Panagiota Sergaki & Achilleas Kontogeorgos & Antonios Tiganis, 2020. "Reciprocity in Student Groups: Experimental Evidence from Greece," International Journal of Economic Sciences, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences, vol. 9(1), pages 44-67, June.
    6. Erkut, Hande, 2018. "Social norms and preferences for generosity are domain dependent," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Market Behavior SP II 2018-207, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    7. Füllbrunn, Sascha & Vyrastekova, Jana, 2023. "Does trust break even? A trust-game experiment with negative endowments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    8. François Cochard & Alexandre Flage, 2023. "Sharing Losses in Dictator and Ultimatum Games: A Meta-Analysis," Working Papers 2023-09, CRESE.
    9. Julien Benistant & Remi Suchon, 2020. "It Does (not) Get Better: Expected Income Violation and Altruism," Working Papers ECARES 2020-35, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

  2. Kroll, Eike B. & Morgenstern, Ralf & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2014. "Bargaining power does not matter when sharing losses – Experimental evidence of equal split in the Nash bargaining game," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 261-272.

    Cited by:

    1. Wulf Gaertner & Richard Bradley & Yongsheng Xu & Lars Schwettmann, 2019. "Against the proportionality principle: Experimental findings on bargaining over losses," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Navarro, Noemí & Veszteg, Róbert F., 2020. "On the empirical validity of axioms in unstructured bargaining," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 117-145.
    3. Thomas Neumann & Sabrina Kierspel & Ivo Windrich & Roger Berger & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "How to Split Gains and Losses? Experimental Evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.
    4. Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2017. "The Impact of Previous Action on Bargaining—An Experiment on the Emergence of Preferences for Fairness Norms," Games, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-9, August.
    5. Stephan Schosser, 2015. "Who cares about the balderdash I spouted yesterday?* – An experiment on the volatility of bargaining norms –," FEMM Working Papers 150013, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    6. Festjens, Anouk & Bruyneel, Sabrina & Diecidue, Enrico & Dewitte, Siegfried, 2015. "Time-based versus money-based decision making under risk: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 52-72.
    7. Füllbrunn, Sascha & Vyrastekova, Jana, 2023. "Does trust break even? A trust-game experiment with negative endowments," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 103(C).

  3. Siegfried K. Berninghaus & Thomas Neumann & Bodo Vogt, 2014. "Learning in Networks—An Experimental Study Using Stationary Concepts," Games, MDPI, vol. 5(3), pages 1-20, July.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  4. Berninghaus, Siegfried K. & Haller, Sven & Krüger, Tyll & Neumann, Thomas & Schosser, Stephan & Vogt, Bodo, 2013. "Risk attitude, beliefs, and information in a Corruption Game – An experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 46-60.
    See citations under working paper version above.

Chapters

  1. Thomas Neumann & Stephan Schosser & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "Non-acceptance of Losses—An Experimental Study on the Importance of the Sign of Final Outcomes in Ultimatum Bargaining," Operations Research Proceedings, in: Natalia Kliewer & Jan Fabian Ehmke & Ralf Borndörfer (ed.), Operations Research Proceedings 2017, pages 287-292, Springer.

    Cited by:

    1. Thomas Neumann & Sabrina Kierspel & Ivo Windrich & Roger Berger & Bodo Vogt, 2018. "How to Split Gains and Losses? Experimental Evidence of Dictator and Ultimatum Games," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-19, October.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 8 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-GTH: Game Theory (5) 2010-10-02 2011-04-23 2011-11-01 2012-07-08 2012-07-23. Author is listed
  2. NEP-CBE: Cognitive and Behavioural Economics (4) 2010-10-02 2011-04-23 2011-11-01 2012-07-08
  3. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (4) 2010-10-02 2011-11-01 2012-07-08 2012-07-23
  4. NEP-EVO: Evolutionary Economics (3) 2011-04-23 2011-11-01 2012-07-23
  5. NEP-ENT: Entrepreneurship (2) 2015-01-09 2015-06-13
  6. NEP-NET: Network Economics (2) 2011-04-23 2011-11-01
  7. NEP-SBM: Small Business Management (2) 2015-01-09 2015-06-13
  8. NEP-UPT: Utility Models and Prospect Theory (2) 2012-07-08 2012-07-23
  9. NEP-GER: German Papers (1) 2014-04-05

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Thomas Neumann should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.