IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i20p13202-d941590.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring—An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model

Author

Listed:
  • Ulrike Baum

    (Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Frauke Kühn

    (Institute for Sensory and Innovation Research (ISI GmbH), Ascherberg 2, 37124 Rosdorf, Germany
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Marcel Lichters

    (Chair of Marketing and Retailing, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Chemnitz University of Technology, Reichenhainer Straße 39, 09126 Chemnitz, Germany)

  • Anne-Katrin Baum

    (Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Renate Deike

    (Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Hermann Hinrichs

    (Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
    Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Brenneckestraße 6, 39118 Magdeburg, Germany
    Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences (CBBS), Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

  • Thomas Neumann

    (Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Leipziger Str. 44, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany
    Chair in Health Services Research, School of Life Sciences, University of Siegen, Am Eichenhang 50, 57076 Siegen, Germany
    Chair in Empirical Economics, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Universitätsplatz 2, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany
    Research Campus STIMULATE, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Sandtorstraße 23, 39106 Magdeburg, Germany)

Abstract

Home monitoring examinations offer diagnostic and economic advantages compared to inpatient monitoring. In addition, these technical solutions support the preservation of health care in rural areas in the absence of local care providers. The acceptance of patients is crucial for the implementation of home monitoring concepts. The present research assesses the preference for a health service that is to be introduced, namely an EEG home-monitoring of neurological outpatients—using a mobile, dry-electrode EEG (electroencephalography) system—in comparison to the traditional long-time EEG examination in a hospital. Results of a representative study for Germany ( n = 421) reveal a preference for home monitoring. Importantly, this preference is partially driven by a video explaining the home monitoring system. We subsequently analyzed factors that influence the behavioral intention (BI) to use the new EEG system, drawing on an extended Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. The strongest positive predictor of BI is the belief that EEG home-monitoring will improve health quality, while computer anxiety and effort expectancy represent the strongest barriers. Furthermore, we find the UTAUT model’s behavioral intention construct to predict the patients’ decision for or against home monitoring more strongly than any other patient’s characteristic such as gender, health condition, or age, underlying the model’s usefulness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ulrike Baum & Frauke Kühn & Marcel Lichters & Anne-Katrin Baum & Renate Deike & Hermann Hinrichs & Thomas Neumann, 2022. "Neurological Outpatients Prefer EEG Home-Monitoring over Inpatient Monitoring—An Analysis Based on the UTAUT Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13202-:d:941590
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13202/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/20/13202/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khondker Mohammad Zobair & Louis Sanzogni & Luke Houghton & Md Zahidul Islam, 2021. "Forecasting care seekers satisfaction with telemedicine using machine learning and structural equation modeling," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-31, September.
    2. Sarstedt, Marko & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Thiele, Kai O. & Gudergan, Siegfried P., 2016. "Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: Where the bias lies!," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 3998-4010.
    3. Heiko Sorg & Jan P. Ehlers & Christian G. G. Sorg, 2022. "Digitalization in Medicine: Are German Medical Students Well Prepared for the Future?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Shmueli, Galit & Ray, Soumya & Velasquez Estrada, Juan Manuel & Chatla, Suneel Babu, 2016. "The elephant in the room: Predictive performance of PLS models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(10), pages 4552-4564.
    5. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    6. Duarte, Paulo & Pinho, José Carlos, 2019. "A mixed methods UTAUT2-based approach to assess mobile health adoption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 140-150.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kurtaliqi, Fidan & Lancelot Miltgen, Caroline & Viglia, Giampaolo & Pantin-Sohier, Gaëlle, 2024. "Using advanced mixed methods approaches: Combining PLS-SEM and qualitative studies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    2. Ong, Ardvin Kester S. & Kurata, Yoshiki B. & Castro, Sophia Alessandra D.G. & De Leon, Jeanne Paulene B. & Dela Rosa, Hazel V. & Tomines, Alex Patricia J., 2022. "Factors influencing the acceptance of telemedicine in the Philippines," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Mar Ortiz-Gómez & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Horacio Molina-Sánchez, 2020. "Servant Leadership in a Social Religious Organization: An Analysis of Work Engagement, Authenticity, and Spirituality at Work," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-21, November.
    4. Cabrera-Sánchez, Juan-Pedro & Villarejo-Ramos, à ngel F., 2020. "Acceptance and use of big data techniques in services companies," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    5. Leonie Kuen & Fiona Schürmann & Daniel Westmattelmann & Sophie Hartwig & Shay Tzafrir & Gerhard Schewe, 2023. "Trust transfer effects and associated risks in telemedicine adoption," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-22, December.
    6. Carmen M. Felipe & José L. Roldán & Antonio L. Leal-Rodríguez, 2017. "Impact of Organizational Culture Values on Organizational Agility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Christian Nitzl & Wynne W. Chin, 2017. "The case of partial least squares (PLS) path modeling in managerial accounting research," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(2), pages 137-156, May.
    8. Cobelli, Nicola & Cassia, Fabio & Donvito, Raffaele, 2023. "Pharmacists' attitudes and intention to adopt telemedicine: Integrating the market-orientation paradigm and the UTAUT," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    9. Subero-Navarro, à urea & Pelegrín-Borondo, Jorge & Reinares-Lara, Eva & Olarte-Pascual, Cristina, 2022. "Proposal for modeling social robot acceptance by retail customers: CAN model + technophobia," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    10. Marko Sarstedt & Jun-Hwa Cheah, 2019. "Partial least squares structural equation modeling using SmartPLS: a software review," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(3), pages 196-202, September.
    11. Troiville, Julien & Hair, Joe F. & Cliquet, Gérard, 2019. "Definition, conceptualization and measurement of consumer-based retailer brand equity," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 73-84.
    12. Basco, Rodrigo & Hair, Joseph F. & Ringle, Christian M. & Sarstedt, Marko, 2022. "Advancing family business research through modeling nonlinear relationships: Comparing PLS-SEM and multiple regression," Journal of Family Business Strategy, Elsevier, vol. 13(3).
    13. Dell'Anno, Roberto & Pergolizzi, Antonio & Pittiglio, Rosanna & Reganati, Filippo, 2020. "Waste crime in Italian Regions: A Structural Equation Approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    14. Abbasi, Ghazanfar A & Jagaveeran, Mahavithya & Goh, Yen-Nee & Tariq, Beenish, 2021. "The impact of type of content use on smartphone addiction and academic performance: Physical activity as moderator," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    15. Jun-Hwa Cheah & Hiram Ting & T. Ramayah & Mumtaz Ali Memon & Tat-Huei Cham & Enrico Ciavolino, 2019. "A comparison of five reflective–formative estimation approaches: reconsideration and recommendations for tourism research," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 1421-1458, May.
    16. Cenamor, Javier, 2022. "Use of health self-management platform features: The case of a specialist ehealth app," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Joseph F. Hair & G. Tomas M. Hult & Christian M. Ringle & Marko Sarstedt & Kai Oliver Thiele, 2017. "Mirror, mirror on the wall: a comparative evaluation of composite-based structural equation modeling methods," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 616-632, September.
    18. Zulfiqar Ali & Hongyi Sun & Murad Ali, 2017. "The Impact of Managerial and Adaptive Capabilities to Stimulate Organizational Innovation in SMEs: A Complementary PLS–SEM Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-23, November.
    19. Hair, Joe F. & Howard, Matt C. & Nitzl, Christian, 2020. "Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 101-110.
    20. Roberto Dell’Anno, 2020. "Corruption around the world: an analysis by partial least squares—structural equation modeling," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 327-350, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:20:p:13202-:d:941590. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.