IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pfe495.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Arne Martin Fevolden

(We have lost contact with this author. Please ask them to update the entry or send us the correct address or status for this person. Thank you.)

Personal Details

First Name:Arne
Middle Name:Martin
Last Name:Fevolden
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pfe495
The above email address does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Arne Martin Fevolden to update the entry or send us the correct address or status for this person. Thank you.

Affiliation

Nordisk Institutt for studier av innovasjon, forskning og utdanning (NIFU)

Oslo, Norway
http://www.nifu.no/
RePEc:edi:steppno (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2014. "The Trade-off between Innovation and Defence Industrial Policy: A Simulation Model Analysis of the Norwegian Defence Industry," MPRA Paper 55326, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  2. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2012. "Defence firms facing liberalization: innovation and export in an agent-based model of the defence industry," MPRA Paper 35702, University Library of Munich, Germany.
  3. Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2012. "Capable companies or changing markets? Explaining the export performance of firms in the defence industry," MPRA Paper 36026, University Library of Munich, Germany.

Articles

  1. Pål Børing & Arne Martin Fevolden & Michael Spjelkavik Mark & Fredrik Niclas Piro, 2020. "Bringing home the bacon: the relationship between firm characteristics and participation in EU Horizon 2020 projects," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(19), pages 1556-1561, November.
  2. Bugge, Markus M. & Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje, 2019. "Governance for system optimization and system change: The case of urban waste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1076-1090.
  3. Lisa Scordato & Markus M. Bugge & Arne Martin Fevolden, 2017. "Directionality across Diversity: Governing Contending Policy Rationales in the Transition towards the Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
  4. Jay Sterling Gregg & Simon Bolwig & Teis Hansen & Ola Solér & Sara Ben Amer-Allam & Júlia Pladevall Viladecans & Antje Klitkou & Arne Fevolden, 2017. "Value Chain Structures that Define European Cellulosic Ethanol Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.
  5. Arne Martin Fevolden & Lars Coenen & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2017. "The Role of Trials and Demonstration Projects in the Development of a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
  6. Pål Børing & Arne Martin Fevolden & Sverre Herstad, 2016. "Eager and able: a study of innovation activity among young, mature and old firms in Norway," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 291-297.
  7. Arne Martin Fevolden & Sverre J. Herstad & Tore Sandven, 2015. "Specialist supplier or systems integrator? The relationship between competencies and export performance in the Norwegian defence industry," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 153-157, January.
  8. Arne Martin Fevolden, 2015. "New Perspectives on Capacity Utilization: From Moving Assembly Lines to Computer-Based Control Systems," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 12(04), pages 1-13.
  9. Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2014. "Capable Companies or Changing Markets? Explaining the Export Performance of Firms in the Defence Industry," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 549-575, December.
  10. Martin Blom & Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2014. "Defence firms facing liberalization: innovation and export in an agent-based model of the defence industry," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 430-461, December.
  11. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne Martin, 2013. "The trade-off between innovation and defense industrial policy: A simulation model analysis of the Norwegian defense industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1579-1592.
  12. Arne Fevolden & Terje Grønning, 2010. "Combining Innovation and Capacity Utilization in High Throughput Systems: Moving Beyond the Product Life Cycle Model by Introducing Second-Order Innovations," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 609-628.

Books

  1. Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2015. "Innovation and Liberalization in the European Defence Sector," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15941.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2014. "The Trade-off between Innovation and Defence Industrial Policy: A Simulation Model Analysis of the Norwegian Defence Industry," MPRA Paper 55326, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Day-Yang Liu & Chia-Kan Wang & Chung-Yi Fang & Pei-Leen Liu, 2021. "A Study of Project Financing on the Defense Industry in Systems Thinking Perspective," Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 11(2), pages 1-6.
    2. Zhu, Huaijia & Chang, Shiwei & Chen, Bo & Zhu, Huaiqi, 2024. "How does military-civilian integration development influence corporate financial constraints in China? Evidence based on quasi-natural experiments," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1273-1289.
    3. Bojnec, Štefan, 2016. "Dual-use products export multipliers with the indirect effects," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 287-296.
    4. Michail Ploumis, 2017. "Hellenic Defence Industrial Base in the Era of Economic Crisis," South-Eastern Europe Journal of Economics, Association of Economic Universities of South and Eastern Europe and the Black Sea Region, vol. 15(2), pages 103-125.

  2. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2012. "Defence firms facing liberalization: innovation and export in an agent-based model of the defence industry," MPRA Paper 35702, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Jackie Krafft & Francesco Quatraro & Pier-Paolo Saviotti, 2014. "The dynamics of knowledge-intensive sectors' knowledge base: Evidence from Biotechnology and Telecommunications," Post-Print hal-01070557, HAL.

  3. Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2012. "Capable companies or changing markets? Explaining the export performance of firms in the defence industry," MPRA Paper 36026, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Cited by:

    1. Vesa Kanniainen & Juha-Matti Lehtonen, 2019. "Offset Contracts as an Insurance Device in Building the National Security," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(1), pages 85-97, January.
    2. Antonio Juan Briones-Peñalver & Juan Andrés Bernal-Conesa & Carmen Nieves Nieto, 2020. "Knowledge and innovation management model. Its influence on technology transfer and performance in Spanish Defence industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 595-615, June.
    3. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne, 2012. "Defence firms facing liberalization: innovation and export in an agent-based model of the defence industry," MPRA Paper 35702, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Wu, Lichao & Wei, Yingqi & Wang, Chengang, 2021. "Disentangling the effects of business groups in the innovation-export relationship," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(1).
    5. Chen, Stephen, 2017. "Profiting from FDI in conflict zones," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 52(6), pages 760-768.
    6. Antonio Juan Briones-Peñalver & Juan Andrés Bernal-Conesa & Carmen Nieves Nieto, 0. "Knowledge and innovation management model. Its influence on technology transfer and performance in Spanish Defence industry," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-21.
    7. Wu, Lichao & Wei, Yingqi & Wang, Chengang & McDonald, Frank & Han, Xia, 2022. "The importance of institutional and financial resources for export performance associated with technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Antonella Biscione & Chiara Burlina & Raul Caruso & Annunziata de Felice, 2021. "Innovation in Transition countries: the role of training," Working Papers 1013, European Centre of Peace Science, Integration and Cooperation (CESPIC), Catholic University 'Our Lady of Good Counsel'.
    9. N�stor Duch-Brown & Antonio Fonfr�a & Elisa Trujillo-Baute, 2014. "Market Structure and Technical Efficiency of Spanish Defense Contractors," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(1), pages 23-38, February.

Articles

  1. Bugge, Markus M. & Fevolden, Arne Martin & Klitkou, Antje, 2019. "Governance for system optimization and system change: The case of urban waste," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 1076-1090.

    Cited by:

    1. Danuta Szpilko, 2020. "Foresight as a Tool for the Planning and Implementation of Visions for Smart City Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, April.
    2. Alena Harbiankova & Sławomir Kalinowski, 2023. "MSW Management to Zero Waste: Challenges and Perspectives in Belarus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    3. Guilberto Borongan & Anchana NaRanong, 2022. "Practical Challenges and Opportunities for Marine Plastic Litter Reduction in Manila: A Structural Equation Modeling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-30, May.
    4. Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko, 2023. "Smart Circular Cities: Governing the Relationality, Spatiality, and Digitality in the Promotion of Circular Economy in an Urban Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-41, August.
    5. Catalin Vrabie, 2021. "Converting Municipal Waste to Energy through the Biomass Chain, a Key Technology for Environmental Issues in (Smart) Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-16, April.
    6. Sabrina Bresciani & Francesca Rizzo & Alessandro Deserti, 2022. "Toward a Comprehensive Framework of Social Innovation for Climate Neutrality: A Systematic Literature Review from Business/Production, Public Policy, Environmental Sciences, Energy, Sustainability and," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    7. Agata Mesjasz-Lech, 2021. "Municipal Urban Waste Management—Challenges for Polish Cities in an Era of Circular Resource Management," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, May.
    8. Anton Atno Parluhutan Sinaga & Sunday Ade Sitorus, 2023. "The Role of Consumer Attitude and Renewable Energy towards Environmental Friendly Policies in the Intention to Comply With the Paid Plastic Environmental Friendly Policy," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(1), pages 14-21, January.
    9. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    10. Haddad, Carolina R. & Bergek, Anna, 2023. "Towards an integrated framework for evaluating transformative innovation policy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(2).
    11. Lucas, Benjamin & Francu, R. Elena & Goulding, James & Harvey, John & Nica-Avram, Georgiana & Perrat, Bertrand, 2021. "A Note on Data-driven Actor-differentiation and SDGs 2 and 12: Insights from a Food-sharing App," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(6).
    12. Justyna Winkowska & Danuta Szpilko, 2020. "Methodology for Integration of Smart City Dimensions in the Socialised Process of Creating City Development," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 524-547.
    13. Gabrielli do Livramento Gonçalves & Walter Leal Filho & Samara da Silva Neiva & André Borchardt Deggau & Manoela de Oliveira Veras & Flávio Ceci & Maurício Andrade de Lima & José Baltazar Salgueirinho, 2021. "The Impacts of the Fourth Industrial Revolution on Smart and Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-21, June.

  2. Lisa Scordato & Markus M. Bugge & Arne Martin Fevolden, 2017. "Directionality across Diversity: Governing Contending Policy Rationales in the Transition towards the Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.

    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Scordato & Markus M Bugge & Teis Hansen & Anne Tanner & Olav Wicken, 2022. "Walking the talk? Innovation policy approaches to unleash the transformative potentials of the Nordic bioeconomy [Derfor har vi brug for en national bioøkonomistrategi. By the Danish Agriculture & ," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 324-346.
    2. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    3. Mairon G. Bastos Lima, 2021. "Corporate Power in the Bioeconomy Transition: The Policies and Politics of Conservative Ecological Modernization in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, June.
    4. Liesbeth de Schutter & Stefan Giljum & Tiina Häyhä & Martin Bruckner & Asjad Naqvi & Ines Omann & Sigrid Stagl, 2019. "Bioeconomy Transitions through the Lens of Coupled Social-Ecological Systems: A Framework for Place-Based Responsibility in the Global Resource System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Julia Szulecka, 2019. "Towards Sustainable Wood-Based Energy: Evaluation and Strategies for Mainstreaming Sustainability in the Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. George B. Frisvold & Steven M. Moss & Andrea Hodgson & Mary E. Maxon, 2021. "Understanding the U.S. Bioeconomy: A New Definition and Landscape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    7. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    8. Bastos Lima, Mairon G., 2022. "Just transition towards a bioeconomy: Four dimensions in Brazil, India and Indonesia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    9. Daniel Hausknost & Ernst Schriefl & Christian Lauk & Gerald Kalt, 2017. "A Transition to Which Bioeconomy? An Exploration of Diverging Techno-Political Choices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, April.
    10. Marco Capasso & Antje Klitkou, 2020. "Socioeconomic Indicators to Monitor Norway’s Bioeconomy in Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Ramcilovic-Suominen, Sabaheta & Kröger, Markus & Dressler, Wolfram, 2022. "From pro-growth and planetary limits to degrowth and decoloniality: An emerging bioeconomy policy and research agenda," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. James Karabin & Izaac Mansfield & Emma K Frow, 2021. "Exploring presentations of sustainability by US synthetic biology companies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Edler, Jakob & Köhler, Jonathan Hugh & Wydra, Sven & Salas-Gironés, Edgar & Schiller, Katharina & Braun, Annette, 2021. "Dimensions of systems and transformations: Towards an integrated framework for system transformations," Working Papers "Sustainability and Innovation" S03/2021, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).

  3. Jay Sterling Gregg & Simon Bolwig & Teis Hansen & Ola Solér & Sara Ben Amer-Allam & Júlia Pladevall Viladecans & Antje Klitkou & Arne Fevolden, 2017. "Value Chain Structures that Define European Cellulosic Ethanol Production," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-17, January.

    Cited by:

    1. Lisa Scordato & Markus M Bugge & Teis Hansen & Anne Tanner & Olav Wicken, 2022. "Walking the talk? Innovation policy approaches to unleash the transformative potentials of the Nordic bioeconomy [Derfor har vi brug for en national bioøkonomistrategi. By the Danish Agriculture & ," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(2), pages 324-346.
    2. Rodica Niculescu & Adrian Clenci & Victor Iorga-Siman, 2019. "Review on the Use of Diesel–Biodiesel–Alcohol Blends in Compression Ignition Engines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-41, March.
    3. Noe Aguilar Rivera, 2022. "Sustainable Biofuels. Strategy for Growth and Energy Security," Remef - Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF (The Mexican Journal of Economics and Finance), Instituto Mexicano de Ejecutivos de Finanzas, IMEF, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, Julio - S.
    4. Wiebke Reim & Vinit Parida & David R. Sjödin, 2019. "Circular Business Models for the Bio-Economy: A Review and New Directions for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Manju Dhakad Tanwar & Felipe Andrade Torres & Ali Mubarak Alqahtani & Pankaj Kumar Tanwar & Yashas Bhand & Omid Doustdar, 2023. "Promising Bioalcohols for Low-Emission Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Shuichiro Kajima & Yuta Uchiyama & Ryo Kohsaka, 2020. "Intellectual Property Strategies for Timber and Forest Products: The Case of Regional Collective Trademark Applications by Japanese Forestry Associations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, March.
    7. Menglin Xing & Fuzhou Luo, 2018. "Comparative Study on the Optimization Path of Industrial Value Chain in China’s Resource-Based Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, April.
    8. Ge, Yuntian & Li, Lin & Yun, Lingxiang, 2021. "Modeling and economic optimization of cellulosic biofuel supply chain considering multiple conversion pathways," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 281(C).
    9. Judit Oláh & Eszter Krisán & Anna Kiss & Zoltán Lakner & József Popp, 2020. "PRISMA Statement for Reporting Literature Searches in Systematic Reviews of the Bioethanol Sector," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-35, May.
    10. Woldemariam, Daniel & Kullab, Alaa & Khan, Ershad Ullah & Martin, Andrew, 2018. "Recovery of ethanol from scrubber-water by district heat-driven membrane distillation: Industrial-scale technoeconomic study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PB), pages 484-494.

  4. Arne Martin Fevolden & Lars Coenen & Teis Hansen & Antje Klitkou, 2017. "The Role of Trials and Demonstration Projects in the Development of a Sustainable Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.

    Cited by:

    1. Sofia Nordqvist & Johan Frishammar, 2019. "Knowledge types to progress the development of sustainable technologies: a case study of Swedish demonstration plants," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 75-95, March.
    2. Roberto Rivas Hermann & Karin Wigger, 2017. "Eco-Innovation Drivers in Value-Creating Networks: A Case Study of Ship Retrofitting Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Bolwig, Simon & Bazbauers, Gatis & Klitkou, Antje & Lund, Peter D. & Blumberga, Andra & Gravelsins, Armands & Blumberga, Dagnija, 2019. "Review of modelling energy transitions pathways with application to energy system flexibility," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 440-452.
    4. Wilde, Kerstin & Hermans, Frans, 2021. "Innovation in the bioeconomy: Perspectives of entrepreneurs on relevant framework conditions," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 314.
    5. Palage, Kristoffer & Lundmark, Robert & Söderholm, Patrik, 2019. "The impact of pilot and demonstration plants on innovation: The case of advanced biofuel patenting in the European Union," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 42-55.
    6. Bossink, Bart, 2020. "Learning strategies in sustainable energy demonstration projects: What organizations learn from sustainable energy demonstrations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    7. Eva Heiskanen & Kaarina Hyvönen & Senja Laakso & Päivi Laitila & Kaisa Matschoss & Irmeli Mikkonen, 2017. "Adoption and Use of Low-Carbon Technologies: Lessons from 100 Finnish Pilot Studies, Field Experiments and Demonstrations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-20, May.
    8. Hedeler, Barbara & Lettner, Miriam & Stern, Tobias & Schwarzbauer, Peter & Hesser, Franziska, 2020. "Strategic decisions on knowledge development and diffusion at pilot and demonstration projects: An empirical mapping of actors, projects and strategies in the case of circular forest bioeconomy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    9. Durwin H.J. Lynch & Pim Klaassen & Lan van Wassenaer & Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, 2020. "Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Liu, Xiaoling & Sun, Xiaohua & Li, Mingshan & Zhai, Yu, 2020. "The effects of demonstration projects on electric vehicle diffusion: An empirical study in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    11. Vivien, F.-D. & Nieddu, M. & Befort, N. & Debref, R. & Giampietro, M., 2019. "The Hijacking of the Bioeconomy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 189-197.
    12. Befort, N., 2020. "Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    13. Sebastian Fastenrath & Lars Coenen & Kathryn Davidson, 2019. "Urban Resilience in Action: the Resilient Melbourne Strategy as Transformative Urban Innovation Policy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-10, January.

  5. Pål Børing & Arne Martin Fevolden & Sverre Herstad, 2016. "Eager and able: a study of innovation activity among young, mature and old firms in Norway," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 36(1), pages 291-297.

    Cited by:

    1. Pål Børing, 2019. "The relationship between firm productivity, firm size and CSR objectives for innovations," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 9(3), pages 269-297, September.

  6. Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2014. "Capable Companies or Changing Markets? Explaining the Export Performance of Firms in the Defence Industry," Defence and Peace Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 549-575, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  7. Martin Blom & Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2014. "Defence firms facing liberalization: innovation and export in an agent-based model of the defence industry," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 430-461, December.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  8. Blom, Martin & Castellacci, Fulvio & Fevolden, Arne Martin, 2013. "The trade-off between innovation and defense industrial policy: A simulation model analysis of the Norwegian defense industry," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 80(8), pages 1579-1592.
    See citations under working paper version above.
  9. Arne Fevolden & Terje Grønning, 2010. "Combining Innovation and Capacity Utilization in High Throughput Systems: Moving Beyond the Product Life Cycle Model by Introducing Second-Order Innovations," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 609-628.

    Cited by:

    1. Rawan Elshaarawy & Riham A. Ezzat, 2023. "Global value chains, financial constraints, and innovation," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 61(1), pages 223-257, June.

Books

  1. Fulvio Castellacci & Arne Fevolden, 2015. "Innovation and Liberalization in the European Defence Sector," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 15941.

    Cited by:

    1. Adrien Caralp, 2017. "The restructuring of the European land armaments industry: Between political incentives and economic pressures," Economics of Peace and Security Journal, EPS Publishing, vol. 12(1), pages 12-19, April.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 3 papers announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-CSE: Economics of Strategic Management (3) 2012-01-10 2012-01-25 2014-04-29
  2. NEP-INO: Innovation (3) 2012-01-10 2012-01-25 2014-04-29
  3. NEP-CMP: Computational Economics (2) 2012-01-10 2014-04-29
  4. NEP-EUR: Microeconomic European Issues (1) 2012-01-10
  5. NEP-KNM: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Economy (1) 2012-01-10
  6. NEP-TID: Technology and Industrial Dynamics (1) 2014-04-29

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Arne Martin Fevolden should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.