IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/f/pca397.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Natalia Candelo Londono

Personal Details

First Name:Natalia
Middle Name:
Last Name:Candelo Londono
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:pca397
https://sites.google.com/site/nataliacandelolondono/
Terminal Degree: (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Department of Economics
Queens College
City University of New York (CUNY)

New York City, New York (United States)
http://www.qc-econ-bba.org/
RePEc:edi:deqcuus (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles Books

Working papers

  1. Natalia Candelo Londono & Sandra Polanía Reyes, 2008. "Pasos metodológicos de un diseno experimental para medir capital social y acción colectiva en seis ciudades latinoamericanas," Documentos CEDE 5104, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
  2. Juan Camilo Cárdenas & Natalia Candelo & Alejandro Gaviria & Sandra Polania, 2007. "Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study," Documentos CEDE 3885, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
  3. Natalia Candelo Londono, 2006. "El Desafío Intertemporal Del Ahorro Voluntario En Pensiones: Un Análisis Microeconómico Desde La Teoría Del Comportamiento," Documentos CEDE 2489, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.

Articles

  1. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine & Johnson, Cathleen, 2019. "The proposer’s behavior in the ultimatum game in 11 Mexican villages," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 5-8.
  2. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. de Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2019. "Worthiness versus Self‐Interest in Charitable Giving: Evidence from a Low‐Income, Minority Neighborhood," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1196-1216, April.
  3. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine, 2018. "The 2D:4D ratio does not always correlate with economic behavior: A field experiment with African-Americans," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 172-181.
  4. Natalia Candelo & Catherine Eckel & Cathleen Johnson, 2018. "Social Distance Matters in Dictator Games: Evidence from 11 Mexican Villages," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, October.
  5. Natalia Candelo & Rachel T. A. Croson & Catherine Eckel, 2018. "Transmission of information within transnational social networks: a field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(4), pages 905-923, December.
  6. Natalia Candelo & Rachel T. A. Croson & Sherry Xin Li, 2017. "Identity and social exclusion: an experiment with Hispanic immigrants in the U.S," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 460-480, June.

Books

  1. Gandelman, Néstor & Gandelman, Eduardo & Castillo, Marco & Cárdenas, Juan Camilo & Bravo, David & Sethi, Rajiv & Sanhueza, Claudia & Soruco, Ximena & Ñopo, Hugo R. & Rossi, Máximo & Elías, Víctor & El, 2010. "Discrimination in Latin America: An Economic Perspective," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 363, November.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Natalia Candelo Londono & Sandra Polanía Reyes, 2008. "Pasos metodológicos de un diseno experimental para medir capital social y acción colectiva en seis ciudades latinoamericanas," Documentos CEDE 5104, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.

    Cited by:

    1. Edwin Oswaldo Gil Mateus, 2013. "Creencias y elecciones de confianza en estudiantes del proyecto lasallista “Utopía”. Una aproximación empírica," Revista Finanzas y Politica Economica, Universidad Católica de Colombia, vol. 5(2), pages 161-179, December.
    2. Juan José Barrios, 2016. "Trust and civic engagement: evidence from six Latin American cities," Documentos de Investigación 110, Universidad ORT Uruguay. Facultad de Administración y Ciencias Sociales.
    3. Sandra Polania-Reyes, 2016. "Disentangling Social Capital: Lab-in-the-Field Evidence on Coordination, Networks, and Cooperation," Artefactual Field Experiments 00565, The Field Experiments Website.
    4. Nathalie Méndez Méndez & Andrés Casas-Casas, 2017. "Capital social y territorio: Una aproximación multi-métodos a los aspectos microsociales del cambio social en contextos subregionales," Revista Economía y Región, Universidad Tecnológica de Bolívar, vol. 11(2), pages 45-79, December.
    5. Gustavo Adolfo Caballero Orozco, 2010. "Risk Preferences Under Extreme Poverty: A Field Experiment," Documentos CEDE 7717, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    6. Attanasio, Orazio & Polania-Reyes, Sandra & Pellerano, Luca, 2015. "Building social capital: Conditional cash transfers and cooperation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 22-39.

  2. Juan Camilo Cárdenas & Natalia Candelo & Alejandro Gaviria & Sandra Polania, 2007. "Discrimination in the provision of social services to the poor: a field experimental study," Documentos CEDE 3885, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.

    Cited by:

    1. Juan Camilo Cárdenas, 2009. "Experiments in Environment and Development," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 1(1), pages 157-182, September.
    2. Abigail Barr & Andrew Zeitlin, 2011. "Conflict of interest as a barrier to local accountability," CSAE Working Paper Series 2011-13, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    3. Alberto Chong & Hugo Ñopo, 2007. "Discrimination in Latin America: An Elephant in the Room?," Research Department Publications 4536, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    4. Gustavo Adolfo García Cruz. & Luís Miguel Tovar Cuevas, 2006. "La Percepción del Estado de Salud: Una Mirada a las Regiones desde la Encuesta de Calidad de Vida 2003," Documentos de Trabajo 3972, Universidad del Valle, CIDSE.
    5. Cárdenas Juan Camilo & Casas-Casas Andrés & Méndez Nathalie Méndez, 2014. "The Hidden Face of Justice: Fairness, Discrimination and Distribution in Transitional Justice Processes," Peace Economics, Peace Science, and Public Policy, De Gruyter, vol. 20(1), pages 33-60, January.
    6. María José Torres Herrera, 2020. "¿Interactuar o no interactuar? Un estudio experimental sobre expresiones de género," Documentos CEDE 18365, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.
    7. Alberto Chong & Hugo Ñopo, 2007. "Discriminación en América Latina: Eso que (casi) todos vemos? (Discrimination in Latin America: An Elephant in the Room?)," Research Department Publications 4537, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    8. Ulrike Müller, 2012. "Pro-poor Service Delivery and Social Identity," WIDER Working Paper Series wp-2012-055, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).

  3. Natalia Candelo Londono, 2006. "El Desafío Intertemporal Del Ahorro Voluntario En Pensiones: Un Análisis Microeconómico Desde La Teoría Del Comportamiento," Documentos CEDE 2489, Universidad de los Andes, Facultad de Economía, CEDE.

    Cited by:

    1. Carlos Andrés Hernández García, 2009. "Efectos del sistema multifondos en el Régimen de Ahorro Individual en Colombia," Revista de Economía del Rosario, Universidad del Rosario, November.

Articles

  1. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine & Johnson, Cathleen, 2019. "The proposer’s behavior in the ultimatum game in 11 Mexican villages," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 5-8.

    Cited by:

    1. Qi, Tianxiao & Xu, Bin & Wu, Jinshan & Vriend, Nicolaas J., 2022. "On the Stochasticity of Ultimatum Games," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 227-254.
    2. Natalia Candelo & Catherine Eckel & Cathleen Johnson, 2018. "Social Distance Matters in Dictator Games: Evidence from 11 Mexican Villages," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, October.
    3. Gonzalez-Sanchez, Eric & Loyola, Gino, 2024. "Ultimatum bargaining with envy under incomplete information," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-11.

  2. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. de Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2019. "Worthiness versus Self‐Interest in Charitable Giving: Evidence from a Low‐Income, Minority Neighborhood," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1196-1216, April.

    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2023. "Trust among the poor: African Americans trust their neighbors, but are less trusting of public officials," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 427-452, September.
    2. Catherine C. Eckel & Benjamin A. Priday & Rick K. Wilson, 2018. "Charity Begins at Home: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment on Charitable Giving," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine, 2018. "The 2D:4D ratio does not always correlate with economic behavior: A field experiment with African-Americans," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 172-181.
    4. Natalia Candelo & Catherine Eckel & Cathleen Johnson, 2018. "Social Distance Matters in Dictator Games: Evidence from 11 Mexican Villages," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, October.

  3. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine, 2018. "The 2D:4D ratio does not always correlate with economic behavior: A field experiment with African-Americans," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 172-181.

    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2023. "Trust among the poor: African Americans trust their neighbors, but are less trusting of public officials," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 427-452, September.
    2. da Silva, Eduardo Borges & Silva, Thiago Christiano & Constantino, Michel & Amancio, Diego Raphael & Tabak, Benjamin Miranda, 2020. "Overconfidence and the 2D:4D ratio," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    3. Finley, Brian & Kalwij, Adriaan & Kapteyn, Arie, 2022. "Born to be wild: Second-to-fourth digit length ratio and risk preferences," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).

  4. Natalia Candelo & Catherine Eckel & Cathleen Johnson, 2018. "Social Distance Matters in Dictator Games: Evidence from 11 Mexican Villages," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-13, October.

    Cited by:

    1. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2023. "Trust among the poor: African Americans trust their neighbors, but are less trusting of public officials," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 196(3), pages 427-452, September.
    2. Catherine C. Eckel & Benjamin A. Priday & Rick K. Wilson, 2018. "Charity Begins at Home: A Lab-in-the-Field Experiment on Charitable Giving," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Robson, Matthew, 2021. "Inequality aversion, self-interest and social connectedness," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 744-772.
    4. Adena, Maja & Hakimov, Rustamdjan & Huck, Steffen, 2022. "Charitable Giving by the Poor A Field Experiment in Kyrgyzstan," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 331, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    5. Ingela Alger & Laura Juarez & Miriam Juarez-Torres & Josepa Miquel-Florensa, 2023. "Do Women Contribute More Effort than Men to a Real Public Good?," Post-Print hal-04050045, HAL.
    6. Natalia Candelo & Angela C. M. de Oliveira & Catherine Eckel, 2019. "Worthiness versus Self‐Interest in Charitable Giving: Evidence from a Low‐Income, Minority Neighborhood," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 85(4), pages 1196-1216, April.
    7. Livingston, Jeffrey A. & Rasulmukhamedov, Rustam, 2023. "On the Interpretation of Giving in Dictator Games When the Recipient is a Charity," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 275-285.
    8. Candelo, Natalia & Eckel, Catherine & Johnson, Cathleen, 2019. "The proposer’s behavior in the ultimatum game in 11 Mexican villages," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 5-8.
    9. Schütt, Christoph A., 2023. "The effect of perceived similarity and social proximity on the formation of prosocial preferences," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    10. Adena, Maja & Hakimov, Rustamdjan & Huck, Steffen, 2019. "Charitable giving by the poor: A field experiment on matching and distance to charitable output in Kyrgyzstan," Discussion Papers, Research Unit: Economics of Change SP II 2019-305, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.

  5. Natalia Candelo & Rachel T. A. Croson & Catherine Eckel, 2018. "Transmission of information within transnational social networks: a field experiment," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 21(4), pages 905-923, December.

    Cited by:

    1. Gruener, Sven, 2019. "Sample size calculation in economic experiments," SocArXiv 574he, Center for Open Science.
    2. Gruener, Sven, 2018. "Sample size calculations in economic RCTs: following clinical studies?," SocArXiv 43zbg, Center for Open Science.
    3. Jonathan H.W. Tan & Zhao Zichen & Daniel John Zizzo, 2023. "Scientific Inference from Field and Laboratory Economic Experiments: Empirical Evidence," Discussion Papers Series 663, School of Economics, University of Queensland, Australia.

  6. Natalia Candelo & Rachel T. A. Croson & Sherry Xin Li, 2017. "Identity and social exclusion: an experiment with Hispanic immigrants in the U.S," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 20(2), pages 460-480, June.

    Cited by:

    1. Gallier, Carlo & Goeschl, Timo & Kesternich, Martin & Lohse, Johannes & Reif, Christiane & Römer, Daniel, 2017. "Leveling up? An inter-neighborhood experiment on parochialism and the efficiency of multi-level public goods provision," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-012, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    2. Sabina Albrecht & David Smerdon, 2022. "The social capital effects of refugee resettlement on host communities," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 98(320), pages 80-112, March.
    3. Jiabin Wu, 2021. "Stochastic Value Formation," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 597-611, September.
    4. Klaus Abbink & Lu Dong & Lingbo Hugang, 2018. "Talking Behind Your Back: Asymmetric Communication in a Three-person Dilemma," Discussion Papers 2018-11, The Centre for Decision Research and Experimental Economics, School of Economics, University of Nottingham.
    5. Grote, Nora & Klausmann, Tim & Scharfbillig, Mario, 2023. "Investment in identity in the field-Nudging refugees’ integration effort," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    6. Raghunathan, Kalyani & Alvi, Muzna & Sehgal, Mrignyani, 2023. "Ethnicity, information and cooperation: Evidence from a group-based nutrition intervention," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Lindokuhle Njozela & Justine Burns & Arnim Langer, 2018. "The Effects of Social Exclusion and Group Heterogeneity on the Provision of Public Goods," Games, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, August.
    8. Guo, Shiqi & Liang, Pinghan & Xiao, Erte, 2020. "In-group bias in prisons," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 328-340.
    9. Li, Sherry Xin & de Oliveira, Angela C.M. & Eckel, Catherine, 2017. "Common identity and the voluntary provision of public goods: An experimental investigation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 32-46.
    10. Nora Grote & Tim Klausmann & Mario Scharfbillig, 2019. "Investment in Identity in the Field - Nudging Refugees' Integration Effort," Working Papers 1905, Gutenberg School of Management and Economics, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, revised 24 Sep 2021.
    11. Liang, Pinghan & Xiao, Shukang, 2022. "Pray, vote, and money: The double-edged sword effect of religions on rural political participation in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).

Books

  1. Gandelman, Néstor & Gandelman, Eduardo & Castillo, Marco & Cárdenas, Juan Camilo & Bravo, David & Sethi, Rajiv & Sanhueza, Claudia & Soruco, Ximena & Ñopo, Hugo R. & Rossi, Máximo & Elías, Víctor & El, 2010. "Discrimination in Latin America: An Economic Perspective," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 363, November.

    Cited by:

    1. Zanoni, Wladimir & Duryea, Suzanne & Paredes, Jorge, 2024. "Exploring Gender Discrimination: A Multi-Trial Field Experiment in Urban Ecuador," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 13705, Inter-American Development Bank.
    2. Christian Daude & Virginia Robano, 2015. "On intergenerational (im)mobility in Latin America," Latin American Economic Review, Springer;Centro de Investigaciòn y Docencia Económica (CIDE), vol. 24(1), pages 1-29, December.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-DEV: Development (1) 2008-10-21
  2. NEP-EXP: Experimental Economics (1) 2008-10-21
  3. NEP-LAM: Central and South America (1) 2008-10-21

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Natalia Candelo Londono should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.