IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/psz73.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Ferenc Szucs

Personal Details

First Name:Ferenc
Middle Name:
Last Name:Szucs
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:psz73
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/view/ferencszucs
Terminal Degree:2018 Department of Economics; University of California-Berkeley (from RePEc Genealogy)

Affiliation

Nationalekonomiska institutionen
Stockholms Universitet

Stockholm, Sweden
http://www.ne.su.se/
RePEc:edi:neisuse (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Szeidl, Adam & Szucs, Ferenc, 2022. "The Political Economy of Alternative Realities," CEPR Discussion Papers 17767, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
  2. Szeidl, Adam & Szucs, Ferenc, 2017. "Media Capture through Favor Exchange," CEPR Discussion Papers 11875, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

Articles

  1. Ferenc Szucs, 2024. "Discretion and Favoritism in Public Procurement," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 117-160.
  2. Garz, Marcel & Szucs, Ferenc, 2023. "Algorithmic selection and supply of political news on Facebook," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
  3. Adam Szeidl & Ferenc Szucs, 2021. "Media Capture Through Favor Exchange," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 281-310, January.
  4. Szűcs, Ferenc, 2010. "Adaptáció, verseny és innováció [Adaptation, competition and innovation]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 59-70.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Szeidl, Adam & Szucs, Ferenc, 2017. "Media Capture through Favor Exchange," CEPR Discussion Papers 11875, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.

    Cited by:

    1. Gabriele Gratton & Barton E Lee, 2024. "Liberty, Security, and Accountability: The Rise and Fall of Illiberal Democracies," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 91(1), pages 340-371.
    2. Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Münster, 2023. "Strategic Complementarities in a Model of Commercial Media Bias," CESifo Working Paper Series 10738, CESifo.
    3. Brian Knight & Ana Tribin, 2019. "Opposition Media, State Censorship, and Political Accountability: Evidence from Chavez's Venezuela," NBER Working Papers 25916, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Eraslan, Hulya & Ozerturk, Saltuk, 2017. "Information Gatekeeping and Media Bias," Working Papers 17-001, Rice University, Department of Economics.
    5. Berlinger, Edina & Lilla Keresztúri, Judit & Lublóy, Ágnes & Vőneki Tamásné, Zsuzsanna, 2022. "Press freedom and operational losses: The monitoring role of the media," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    6. Commander, Simon & Poupakis, Stavros, 2020. "Political Networks across the Globe," IZA Discussion Papers 13103, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    7. Kyriacou, Andreas & Trivin, Pedro, 2024. "Populism and the rule of law: the importance of institutional legacies," MPRA Paper 120343, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Sergei Guriev & Elias Papaioannou, 2022. "The Political Economy of Populism," Post-Print hal-03874305, HAL.
    9. Garz, Marcel & Szucs, Ferenc, 2023. "Algorithmic selection and supply of political news on Facebook," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    10. Ruben Durante & Andrea Fabiani & Luc Laeven & José-Luis Peydró, 2021. "Media capture by banks," Economics Working Papers 1817, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, revised Mar 2022.
    11. Lei, Yu-Hsiang, 2021. "Quid pro quo? Government-firm relationships in China," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    12. Chopra, Felix & Haaland, Ingar & Roth, Christopher, 2020. "Do People Value More Informative News?," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 493, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    13. Hulya Eraslan & Saltuk Ozerturk, 2018. "Information Gatekeeping and Media Bias," Koç University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum Working Papers 1808, Koc University-TUSIAD Economic Research Forum.
    14. Nicolás Ajzenman & Tiago Cavalcanti & Daniel Da Mata, 2023. "More than Words: Leaders' Speech and Risky Behavior during a Pandemic," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 15(3), pages 351-371, August.
    15. Jiamin Wang & Qian Li & Chenmeng Lai & Victor Song, 2024. "Corporate fraud, political connections, and media bias: Evidence from China," Bulletin of Economic Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 76(2), pages 319-353, April.
    16. Trombetta, Federico & Rossignoli, Domenico, 2021. "The price of silence: Media competition, capture, and electoral accountability," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    17. Louis-Sidois, Charles & Mougin, Elisa, 2023. "Silence the media or the story? Theory and evidence of media capture," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    18. Anna Kerkhof & Johannes Münster, 2023. "Strategic Complementarities in a Model of Commercial Media Bias," ECONtribute Discussion Papers Series 261, University of Bonn and University of Cologne, Germany.
    19. Philine Widmer & Sergio Galletta & Elliott Ash, 2022. "Media Slant is Contagious," Papers 2202.07269, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    20. Gábor Polyák & Ágnes Urbán & Petra Szávai, 2022. "Information Patterns and News Bubbles in Hungary," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 133-145.

Articles

  1. Ferenc Szucs, 2024. "Discretion and Favoritism in Public Procurement," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(1), pages 117-160.

    Cited by:

    1. Antonio Estache & Renaud Foucart & Tomas Serebrisky, 2024. "Can Lotteries help fix Procurement Failures? A Review of Theory and Evidence," Working Papers ECARES 2024-18, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Antonio Estache & Renaud Foucart & Konstantinos Georgalos, 2024. "Preference for Control vs. Random Dictatorship," Working Papers ECARES 2024-10, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

  2. Adam Szeidl & Ferenc Szucs, 2021. "Media Capture Through Favor Exchange," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(1), pages 281-310, January.
    See citations under working paper version above.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

NEP Fields

NEP is an announcement service for new working papers, with a weekly report in each of many fields. This author has had 1 paper announced in NEP. These are the fields, ordered by number of announcements, along with their dates. If the author is listed in the directory of specialists for this field, a link is also provided.
  1. NEP-POL: Positive Political Economics (1) 2017-03-12
  2. NEP-SOC: Social Norms and Social Capital (1) 2017-03-12

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Ferenc Szucs should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.