IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/e/poz105.html
   My authors  Follow this author

Kemal Ozbek

Personal Details

First Name:Kemal
Middle Name:
Last Name:Ozbek
Suffix:
RePEc Short-ID:poz105
[This author has chosen not to make the email address public]
https://sites.google.com/a/cornell.edu/kemal-ozbek/home

Affiliation

Economics Division
University of Southampton

Southampton, United Kingdom
http://www.economics.soton.ac.uk/
RePEc:edi:desotuk (more details at EDIRC)

Research output

as
Jump to: Working papers Articles

Working papers

  1. Mitra, Tapan & Ozbek, Mahmut Kemal, 2010. "On Representation and Weighted Utilitarian Representation of Preference Orders on Finite Utility Streams," Working Papers 10-05, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.

Articles

  1. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2019. "On the identification of changing tastes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 203-216.
  2. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2018. "Mood-driven choices and self-regulation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 727-760.
  3. de Oliveira, Henrique & Denti, Tommaso & Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2017. "Rationally inattentive preferences and hidden information costs," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.
  4. Tapan Mitra & M. Ozbek, 2013. "On representation of monotone preference orders in a sequence space," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 473-487, September.

Citations

Many of the citations below have been collected in an experimental project, CitEc, where a more detailed citation analysis can be found. These are citations from works listed in RePEc that could be analyzed mechanically. So far, only a minority of all works could be analyzed. See under "Corrections" how you can help improve the citation analysis.

Working papers

  1. Mitra, Tapan & Ozbek, Mahmut Kemal, 2010. "On Representation and Weighted Utilitarian Representation of Preference Orders on Finite Utility Streams," Working Papers 10-05, Cornell University, Center for Analytic Economics.

    Cited by:

    1. Yoshihara, Naoki & Veneziani, Roberto, 2013. "The Measurement of Labour Content: A General Approach," Discussion Paper Series 587, Institute of Economic Research, Hitotsubashi University.
    2. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2018. "On the Extension and Decomposition of a Preorder under Translation Invariance," MPRA Paper 90537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Tapan Mitra & M. Ozbek, 2013. "On representation of monotone preference orders in a sequence space," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 473-487, September.

Articles

  1. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2018. "Mood-driven choices and self-regulation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 727-760.

    Cited by:

    1. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2019. "On the identification of changing tastes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 203-216.
    2. Fernando Payró Chew, 2022. "Mixture-Dependent Preference for Commitment," Working Papers 1365, Barcelona School of Economics.
    3. Borah, Abhinash & Garg, Raghvi, 2023. "Reference-dependent self-control: Menu effects and behavioral choices," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 129-145.
    4. Youichiro Higashi & Kazuya Hyogo & Norio Takeoka, 2020. "Costly Subjective Learning," KIER Working Papers 1040, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    5. Tang, Rui & Zhang, Mu, 2023. "Motivated naivete," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).

  2. de Oliveira, Henrique & Denti, Tommaso & Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2017. "Rationally inattentive preferences and hidden information costs," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 12(2), May.

    Cited by:

    1. Isaac Baley & Laura Veldkamp, 2021. "Bayesian Learning," Working Papers 1287, Barcelona School of Economics.
    2. Ludmila Matyskova, 2018. "Bayesian Persuasion with Costly Information Acquisition," CERGE-EI Working Papers wp614, The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education - Economics Institute, Prague.
    3. Andrew Caplin & Mark Dean & John Leahy, 2022. "Rationally Inattentive Behavior: Characterizing and Generalizing Shannon Entropy," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(6), pages 1676-1715.
    4. Andrew Caplin & Dániel Csaba & John Leahy & Oded Nov, 2018. "Rational Inattention, Competitive Supply, and Psychometrics," NBER Working Papers 25224, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Benjamin M. Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2019. "Rational Inattention when Decisions Take Time," NBER Working Papers 26415, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Fosgerau, Mogens & Melo, Emerson & Shum, Matt, 2017. "Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result�," MPRA Paper 76605, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    7. Aubrey Clark & Giovanni Reggiani, 2021. "Contracts for acquiring information," Papers 2103.03911, arXiv.org.
    8. Benjamin Balzer & Benjamin Young, 2020. "A Theory of Intuition and Contemplation," Working Paper Series 2020/01, Economics Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    9. Philippe Jehiel & Jakub Steiner, 2019. "Selective Sampling with Information-Storage Constraints," Working Papers halshs-02183450, HAL.
    10. Bartosz Maćkowiak & Filip Matějka & Mirko Wiederholt, 2023. "Rational Inattention: A Review," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-03878692, HAL.
    11. Luciano Pomatto & Philipp Strack & Omer Tamuz, 2018. "The Cost of Information: The Case of Constant Marginal Costs," Papers 1812.04211, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.
    12. Doron Ravid, 2020. "Ultimatum Bargaining with Rational Inattention," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 110(9), pages 2948-2963, September.
    13. Mensch, Jeffrey, 2021. "Rational inattention and the monotone likelihood ratio property," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    14. Mark Whitmeyer, 2024. "Can One Hear the Shape of a Decision Problem?," Papers 2403.06344, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2024.
    15. Adriani, Fabrizio & Sonderegger, Silvia, 2020. "Optimal similarity judgments in intertemporal choice (and beyond)," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Mogens Fosgerau & Emerson Melo & André de Palma & Matthew Shum, 2017. "Discrete Choice and Rational Inattention: a General Equivalence Result," Discussion Papers 17-26, University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics.
    17. Lin, Yi-Hsuan, 2022. "Stochastic choice and rational inattention," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    18. Aoyama, Tomohito, 2020. "Response time and revealed information structure," Discussion paper series HIAS-E-101, Hitotsubashi Institute for Advanced Study, Hitotsubashi University.
    19. Saponara, Nick, 2022. "Revealed reasoning," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Frank Huettner, & Tamer Boyaci, & Yalcin Akcay, 2016. "Consumer choice under limited attention when alternatives have different information costs," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-16-04_R3, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 26 Sep 2018.
    21. David Walker-Jones, 2019. "Rational Inattention and Perceptual Distance," Papers 1909.00888, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2019.
    22. Moyu Liao, 2020. "Identification and Estimation of A Rational Inattention Discrete Choice Model with Bayesian Persuasion," Papers 2009.08045, arXiv.org.
    23. Daniele Pennesi, 2020. "Identity and information acquisition," Carlo Alberto Notebooks 610, Collegio Carlo Alberto, revised 2021.
    24. Frank Huettner, & Tamer Boyaci, & Yalcin Akcay, 2016. "Consumer choice under limited attention when options have different information costs," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-16-04, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 04 Oct 2016.
    25. Steiner, Jakub & Jehiel, Philippe, 2017. "On Second Thoughts, Selective Memory, and Resulting Behavioral Biases," CEPR Discussion Papers 12546, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    26. Tsakas, Elias, 2018. "Robust scoring rules," Research Memorandum 023, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    27. Benjamin Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2018. "Information Costs and Sequential Information Sampling," NBER Working Papers 25316, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    28. Áron Tóbiás, 2023. "Cognitive limits and preferences for information," Decisions in Economics and Finance, Springer;Associazione per la Matematica, vol. 46(1), pages 221-253, June.
    29. Tommaso Denti & Massimo Marinacci & Aldo Rustichini, 2019. "Experimental Cost of Information," Working Papers 657, IGIER (Innocenzo Gasparini Institute for Economic Research), Bocconi University.
    30. Tsakas, Elias, 2016. "Reasonable doubt revisited," Research Memorandum 017, Maastricht University, Graduate School of Business and Economics (GSBE).
    31. Jetlir Duraj & Yi-Hsuan Lin, 2022. "Costly information and random choice," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 74(1), pages 135-159, July.
    32. Frank Huettner, & Tamer Boyaci, & Yalcin Akcay, 2016. "Consumer choice under limited attention when alternatives have different information costs," ESMT Research Working Papers ESMT-16-04_R2, ESMT European School of Management and Technology, revised 28 Feb 2018.
    33. Liu, Ce & Chambers, Christopher & Rehbeck, John, 2019. "Costly Information Acquisition," Working Papers 2019-9, Michigan State University, Department of Economics.
    34. Ellis, Andrew, 2017. "Foundations for optimal inattention," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 85334, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    35. Benjamin Hébert & Michael Woodford, 2017. "Rational Inattention and Sequential Information Sampling," NBER Working Papers 23787, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    36. Liao, Moyu, 2024. "Identification of a rational inattention discrete choice model," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 240(1).
    37. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2018. "Mood-driven choices and self-regulation," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 727-760.
    38. Ludvig Sinander, 2023. "Optimism, overconfidence, and moral hazard," Papers 2304.08343, arXiv.org, revised May 2024.
    39. Erin T. Bronchetti & Judd B. Kessler & Ellen B. Magenheim & Dmitry Taubinsky & Eric Zwick, 2020. "Is Attention Produced Optimally? Theory and Evidence from Experiments with Bandwidth Enhancements," NBER Working Papers 27443, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    40. Wang, Hailong & Hu, Duni, 2024. "Heterogeneous beliefs with information processing capacity constraints and asset pricing in a monetary economy," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    41. Valentino Dardanoni & Paola Manzini & Marco Mariotti & Christopher J. Tyson, 2020. "Inferring Cognitive Heterogeneity From Aggregate Choices," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 88(3), pages 1269-1296, May.
    42. Youichiro Higashi & Kazuya Hyogo & Norio Takeoka, 2020. "Costly Subjective Learning," KIER Working Papers 1040, Kyoto University, Institute of Economic Research.
    43. S. Nageeb Ali & Nima Haghpanah & Xiao Lin & Ron Siegel, 2020. "How to Sell Hard Information," Papers 2010.08037, arXiv.org.
    44. Frank Huettner & Tamer Boyacı & Yalçın Akçay, 2019. "Consumer Choice Under Limited Attention When Alternatives Have Different Information Costs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(3), pages 671-699, May.
    45. Avoyan, Ala & Romagnoli, Giorgia, 2023. "Paying for inattention," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 226(C).
    46. Daniele Pennesi, 2018. "Perfectionism and willpower," Economic Theory Bulletin, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 6(1), pages 101-110, April.
    47. Tsakas, Elias, 2020. "Robust scoring rules," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 15(3), July.
    48. Jetlir Duraj & Yi-Hsuan Lin, 2022. "Identification and welfare evaluation in sequential sampling models," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 407-431, March.
    49. Monte, Daniel & Linhares, Luis Henrique, 2023. "Stealth Startups, Clauses, and Add-ons: A Model of Strategic Obfuscation," MPRA Paper 115926, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    50. Alexander M. Jakobsen, 2021. "An Axiomatic Model of Persuasion," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 89(5), pages 2081-2116, September.
    51. Daniele Pennesi, 2021. "Between Commitment and Flexibility: Revealing Anticipated Regret and Elation," Working papers 071, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    52. Caballero, Adrián & López-Pérez, Raúl, 2022. "Heterogeneous primacy and recency effects in frequency estimation," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 182-203.
    53. Yuan Gu & Chao Hung Chan, 2024. "Complexity Aversion," Papers 2406.18463, arXiv.org.
    54. Tommaso Denti, 2022. "Posterior Separable Cost of Information," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 112(10), pages 3215-3259, October.
    55. Gonczarowski, Yannai A. & Kominers, Scott Duke & Shorrer, Ran I., 0. "To infinity and beyond: a general framework for scaling economic theories," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society.

  3. Tapan Mitra & M. Ozbek, 2013. "On representation of monotone preference orders in a sequence space," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 41(3), pages 473-487, September.

    Cited by:

    1. Geir B. Asheim & Kuntal Banerjee & Tapan Mitra, 2021. "How stationarity contradicts intergenerational equity," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 423-444, September.
    2. Neyman, Abraham, 2023. "Additive valuations of streams of payoffs that satisfy the time value of money principle: characterization and robust optimization," Theoretical Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 18(1), January.
    3. Metin Uyanik & M. Ali Khan, 2021. "The Continuity Postulate in Economic Theory: A Deconstruction and an Integration," Papers 2108.11736, arXiv.org, revised Jan 2022.
    4. Mabrouk, Mohamed, 2018. "On the Extension and Decomposition of a Preorder under Translation Invariance," MPRA Paper 90537, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    5. Tapan Mitra & Kemal Ozbek, 2021. "Ranking by weighted sum," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 72(2), pages 511-532, September.
    6. Toyotaka Sakai, 2016. "Limit representations of intergenerational equity," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 47(2), pages 481-500, August.
    7. Kuntal Banerjee, 2014. "On the representation of preference orders on sequence spaces," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 43(2), pages 497-506, August.
    8. Banerjee, Kuntal & Mitra, Tapan, 2018. "On Wold’s approach to representation of preferences," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 65-74.

More information

Research fields, statistics, top rankings, if available.

Statistics

Access and download statistics for all items

Co-authorship network on CollEc

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. For general information on how to correct material on RePEc, see these instructions.

To update listings or check citations waiting for approval, Kemal Ozbek should log into the RePEc Author Service.

To make corrections to the bibliographic information of a particular item, find the technical contact on the abstract page of that item. There, details are also given on how to add or correct references and citations.

To link different versions of the same work, where versions have a different title, use this form. Note that if the versions have a very similar title and are in the author's profile, the links will usually be created automatically.

Please note that most corrections can take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.