IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/tuisbw/32010.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Die kundenseitige Wahrnehmung der Servicequalität bei der Nutzung von SST

Author

Listed:
  • Gleitsmann, Sinje
  • Guttzeit, Mandy
  • Roschk, Holger

Abstract

Sogenannte Self-Service-Technologien (SST), wie Bankautomaten, automatischer Self-Checkout in Hotels, Telefonbanking und Dienstleistungen, die der Kunde über das Internet bezieht (z.B. Onlinebanking) werden in den letzten Jahren zunehmend von Unternehmen genutzt, um den kostenintensiven, persönlichen Kontakt mit dem Kunden durch eine günstigere, technologiebasierte Alternative zu ersetzen. Fragestellungen hinsichtlich Akzeptanz und Adoption solcher Technologien werden in der Literatur umfassend diskutiert, es fehlt jedoch bisher an fundierten Untersuchungen zur kundenseitigen Wahrnehmung der Servicequalität dieser Technologien und den Faktoren, die diese beeinflussen. Ausgehend von bestehenden Ergebnissen über die Servicequalität bei interpersonellen Dienstleistungen überträgt dieser Beitrag das Wissen analog auf technologiebasierte Serviceleistungen. Aufbauend auf diesem konzeptionellen Rahmen wird eine empirische Studie durchgeführt, die zwei Wahrnehmungsmodelle der interpersonellen Serviceforschung gegeneinander testet. Modell 1 stellt die Qualitätseigenschaften und die Servicequalität als separate Konstrukte dar, während in Modell 2 die Qualitätseigenschaften als Bestandteile der Servicequalität betrachtet werden. Die Ergebnisse der Studie zeigen, dass im Bereich von SST die Kunden unabhängig von der Bewertung der Qualitätseigenschaften ein globales Servicequalitätsurteil bilden, welches nicht aus der Summe der Qualitätseigenschaften resultiert.

Suggested Citation

  • Gleitsmann, Sinje & Guttzeit, Mandy & Roschk, Holger, 2010. "Die kundenseitige Wahrnehmung der Servicequalität bei der Nutzung von SST," Ilmenauer Schriften zur Betriebswirtschaftslehre, Technische Universität Ilmenau, Institut für Betriebswirtschaftslehre, volume 3, number 32010, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:tuisbw:32010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/55679/1/665348401.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Calder, Bobby J & Phillips, Lynn W & Tybout, Alice M, 1981. "Designing Research for Application," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 8(2), pages 197-207, September.
    2. Babakus, Emin & Boller, Gregory W., 1992. "An empirical assessment of the SERVQUAL scale," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 24(3), pages 253-268, May.
    3. Brady, Michael K. & Cronin, J. Jr. & Brand, Richard R., 2002. "Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 17-31, January.
    4. Prem Shamdasani & Avinandan Mukherjee & Neeru Malhotra, 2008. "Antecedents and consequences of service quality in consumer evaluation of self-service internet technologies," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 117-138, January.
    5. Peter, J Paul & Churchill, Gilbert A, Jr & Brown, Tom J, 1993. "Caution in the Use of Difference Scores in Consumer Research," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 655-662, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. D. Vandaele & P. Gemmel, 2004. "Development of a measurement scale for business-to-business service quality: assessment in the facility services sector," Working Papers of Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Belgium 04/259, Ghent University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    2. Sang-June Park & Youjae Yi, 2016. "Performance-only measures vs. performance-expectation measures of service quality," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(15-16), pages 741-756, December.
    3. Söderlund, Magnus & Sagfossen, Sofie, 2017. "The consumer experience: The impact of supplier effort and consumer effort on customer satisfaction," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 219-229.
    4. Pablo Gutiérrez Rodríguez & José Vázquez Burguete & Roger Vaughan & Jonathan Edwards, 2009. "Quality dimensions in the public sector: municipal services and citizen’s perception," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 6(1), pages 75-90, June.
    5. Calabrese, Armando, 2012. "Service productivity and service quality: A necessary trade-off?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 800-812.
    6. Spiros Gounaris, 2005. "An alternative measure for assessing perceived quality of software house services," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(6), pages 803-823, September.
    7. Brady, Michael K. & Cronin, J. Jr. & Brand, Richard R., 2002. "Performance-only measurement of service quality: a replication and extension," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 17-31, January.
    8. Nikhil Chandra Shil & Bhagaban Das, 2012. "Satisfaction management in retail financial services: an analysis of gap in perceived quality," International Journal of Financial Services Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 5(3), pages 256-271.
    9. Babic-Hodovic Vesna & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic Maja & Imsirpasic Amina, 2017. "Perceived Quality and Corporate Image in Mobile Services: The Role of Technical and Functional Quality," South East European Journal of Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 12(1), pages 114-125, April.
    10. Akinci, Serkan & Atilgan-Inan, Eda & Aksoy, Safak, 2010. "Re-assessment of E-S-Qual and E-RecS-Qual in a pure service setting," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 232-240, March.
    11. Smith, Anne M., 1999. "Some Problems When Adopting Churchill's Paradigm for the Development of Service Quality Measurement Scales," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 109-120, October.
    12. Ueltschy, Linda C. & Laroche, Michel & Tamilia, Robert D. & Yannopoulos, Peter, 2004. "Cross-cultural invariance of measures of satisfaction and service quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 57(8), pages 901-912, August.
    13. Jaya Sangeetha, 2017. "Development of Scale for Service Quality, Satisfaction and Behavioral intentions: Middle Eastern Context," Advances in Management and Applied Economics, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 1-4.
    14. Andreas Kakouris & Elina Meliou, 2011. "New Public Management: Promote the Public Sector Modernization Through Service Quality. Current Experiences and Future Challenges," Public Organization Review, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 351-369, December.
    15. Nugroho, Adi, 2021. "Study of Airport Service Quality and Profitability in Indonesia," OSF Preprints ah2ns, Center for Open Science.
    16. Jung-Yu Lai & Khire Rushikesh Ulhas & Jian-Da Lin, 2014. "Assessing and managing e-commerce service convenience," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 16(2), pages 273-289, April.
    17. Karsten Hadwich & Corina Keller, 2015. "Interne Servicequalität in Unternehmen: Eine empirische Untersuchung der Einflussfaktoren und Auswirkungen," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 170-205, May.
    18. Homburg, Christian & Rudolph, Bettina, 2001. "Customer satisfaction in industrial markets: dimensional and multiple role issues," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 52(1), pages 15-33, April.
    19. Correia Loureiro, Sandra María & Miranda González, Francisco Javier, 2012. "DUAQUAL: calidad percibida por docentes y alumnos en la gestión universitaria," Cuadernos de Gestión, Universidad del País Vasco - Instituto de Economía Aplicada a la Empresa (IEAE).
    20. Heng Zhang & Po-Chien Chang & Ming-Fong Tsai, 2018. "How Physical Environment Impacts Visitors’ Behavior in Learning-Based Tourism—The Example of Technology Museum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-25, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:tuisbw:32010. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fwtuide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.