IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/zbw/oefsef/305301.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Securing institutional workers' power in the global garment industry: The ACT agreement's efforts to establish sectoral collective bargaining in Cambodia

Author

Listed:
  • Holl, Anna

Abstract

This master thesis analyses the implementation of the Action, Collaboration, Transformation (ACT) agreement, signed between 20 garment lead firms and the Global Union Federation IndustriALL. The agreement seeks to secure living wages through a dual approach. At the national scale in selected garment producer countries, the agreement aims to establish sectoral collective bargaining between garment trade unions and employer associations. At the transnational scale, lead firms have committed to support this process by transforming their purchasing practices to enable negotiated changes structurally and financially. This thesis analyses the implementation process in Cambodia, the country with the longest and most comprehensive negotiation process. Theoretically, I complement the vertical perspective of the GPN approach with the horizontal perspective of the Power Resource approach (PRA). To combine these two approaches, I use the concept of scales to describe the complex geographical relations in the ACT agreement. I explore how vertical and horizontal power relations influenced the implementation process in Cambodia between mid-2018 and mid-2020, and how this process in turn affects these power relations. Drawing on the qualitative analysis of press and media articles and interviews with Cambodian trade unionists (6), a representative of the Cambodian garment employer association (1), IndustriALL and ACT staff (2) and industry experts (2), this thesis identifies three phases and its key developments, in addition to summarising the position of the employers' association and six unions on the implementation process. Although, ACT is a promising and qualitatively novel approach to labour governance and has been appreciated by Cambodian stakeholders, the implementation process in Cambodia has been unsuccessful. Key factors identified are limited lead firm participation, institutional weaknesses in the mechanism, intense regional competition and the lead firms' mode of handling the Covid-19 pandemic. These factors left the vertical and horizontal relations highly asymmetrical and resulted in the fact that the employer association declined to enter sectoral bargaining. On the horizontal dimension, the thesis finds that while unions were eager to join sectoral bargaining, the employer association and the state preferred and were able to prevent the establishment of a new form of institutional power for trade unions. IndustriALL and Cambodian unions did not use their power resources to pressure lead firms and employers to get the establishment of sectoral bargaining off the ground. The thesis concludes that ACT represents a promising and novel approach to GPN specific problems, but it lacks a power-sensitive approach to implementation.

Suggested Citation

  • Holl, Anna, 2024. "Securing institutional workers' power in the global garment industry: The ACT agreement's efforts to establish sectoral collective bargaining in Cambodia," ÖFSE-Forum, Austrian Foundation for Development Research (ÖFSE), volume 90, number 305301.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsef:305301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/305301/1/1907331573.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:oefsef:305301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ofsewat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.