IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wfo/wstudy/24788.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Patente. Ein Indikator für technologische Leistungsfähigkeit und Internationalisierung

Author

Listed:
  • Andreas Schibany

    (Joanneum Research Forschungsgesellschaft mbH)

  • Bernhard Dachs

    (ARC Seibersdorf – Systems Research)

Abstract

Die Studie zeigt den Effekt der Internationalisierung von Unternehmensforschung anhand von grenzüberschreitenden Patentanmeldungen. Multinationale Unternehmen melden zunehmend Erfindungen aus Tochterunternehmen zentral über das Mutterunternehmen bei internationalen Patentämtern an; Patentstatistiken nach Herkunftsland des Anmelders spiegeln deshalb nur unzureichend die technologische Leistungsfähigkeit eines Landes wider. Die Analyse der Patentanmeldungen am EPO zeigt, dass etwa ein Drittel der Erfindungen, an denen österreichische Erfinder beteiligt sind, von ausländischen Organisationen angemeldet werden. Umgekehrt werden in nahezu 20% aller österreichischen Patentanmeldungen ausländische Erfinder angeführt.

Suggested Citation

  • Andreas Schibany & Bernhard Dachs, 2003. "Patente. Ein Indikator für technologische Leistungsfähigkeit und Internationalisierung," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 24788, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:24788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.wifo.ac.at/wwa/pubid/24788
    File Function: abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Basberg, Bjorn L., 1987. "Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(2-4), pages 131-141, August.
    2. Zvi Griliches, 1998. "Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: A Survey," NBER Chapters, in: R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence, pages 287-343, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    3. Giovanni Dosi, 2000. "Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation," Chapters, in: Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics, chapter 2, pages 63-114, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Richard Levin & Peter C. Reiss, 1984. "Tests of a Schumpeterian Model of R&D and Market Structure," NBER Chapters, in: R&D, Patents, and Productivity, pages 175-208, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    5. Raymond Vernon, 1966. "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 80(2), pages 190-207.
    6. Guellec, Dominique & Pottelsberghe de la Potterie, Bruno v., 2001. "The internationalisation of technology analysed with patent data," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 1253-1266, October.
    7. repec:fth:harver:1473 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Patel, Pari & Vega, Modesto, 1999. "Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages1," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 28(2-3), pages 145-155, March.
    9. Cantwell, John, 1995. "The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model?," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 19(1), pages 155-174, February.
    10. Peter Huber & Daniela Kletzan-Slamanig, 2000. "Bestimmungsfaktoren der Integration von Unternehmen in internationale Netzwerke," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 19531.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jürgen Janger, 2005. "The Research and Development System in Austria – Input and Output Indicators," Monetary Policy & the Economy, Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Austrian Central Bank), issue 1, pages 43-57.
    2. Bernhard Dachs & Klaus Friesenbichler & Martin Falk & Brigitte Nones, 2005. "Innovationsaktivitäten österreichischer Unternehmen im Ausland. Umfang, Motive und Auswirkungen auf Österreich," WIFO Studies, WIFO, number 28809.
    3. Helmut Gassler & Brigitte Nones, 2008. "Internationalisation of R&D and embeddedness: the case of Austria," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 407-421, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mafini Dosso & Antonio Vezzani, 2015. "Top R&D investors and international knowledge seeking: the role of emerging technologies and technological proximity," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2015-09, Joint Research Centre.
    2. Gaétan de Rassenfosse & Russell Thomson, 2019. "R&D offshoring and home industry productivity," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 28(6), pages 1497-1513.
    3. Bas, Christian Le & Sierra, Christophe, 2002. "'Location versus home country advantages' in R&D activities: some further results on multinationals' locational strategies," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 589-609, May.
    4. René Belderbos & Bart Leten & Shinya Suzuki, 2017. "Scientific research, firm heterogeneity, and foreign R&D locations of multinational firms," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(3), pages 691-711, September.
    5. Jérôme Danguy, 2017. "Globalization of innovation production: A patent-based industry analysis," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 44(1), pages 75-94.
    6. Belderbos, Rene & Leten, Bart & Suzuki, Shinya, 2009. "Does Excellence in Academic Research Attract Foreign R&D?," MERIT Working Papers 2009-066, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    7. Patricia Laurens & Christian Le Bas & Antoine Schoen & Philippe Larédo, 2015. "Internationalisation of European MNCs R&D: " deglobalisation " and evolution of the locational strategies [Internationalisation de la recherche développement des FMN européennes : « déglo," Post-Print hal-01775107, HAL.
    8. Michele Cincera & Bruno van Pottelsberghe de la Potterie & Veugelers Reinhilde, 2006. "Assessing the foreign control of production of technology: The case of a small open economy," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 66(3), pages 493-512, March.
    9. Jérôme Danguy, 2014. "Who collaborates with whom: the role of technological distance in international innovation," Working Papers TIMES² 2014-010, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Andrea Fernández-Ribas & Philip Shapira, 2009. "Technological diversity, scientific excellence and the location of inventive activities abroad: the case of nanotechnology," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 34(3), pages 286-303, June.
    11. Thomson, Russell, 2013. "National scientific capacity and R&D offshoring," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(2), pages 517-528.
    12. Dominique Guellec & Bruno Van Pottelsberghe, 2004. "Measuring the globalisation of technology: An approach based on patent data," Working Papers CEB 04-013.RS, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    13. Montobbio, Fabio & Sterzi, Valerio, 2013. "The Globalization of Technology in Emerging Markets: A Gravity Model on the Determinants of International Patent Collaborations," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 281-299.
    14. Tamar Almor & Niron Hashai & Seev Hirsch, 2006. "The product cycle revisited: Knowledge intensity and firm internationalization," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 507-528, September.
    15. Marian Beise & Heike Belitz, 1998. "Trends in the Internationalisation of R&D - the German Perspective," Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung / Quarterly Journal of Economic Research, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research, vol. 67(2), pages 67-85.
    16. Philippe Moati & El Mouhoud Mouhoub, 2005. "Les nouvelles logiques de décomposition internationale des processus productifs," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 115(5), pages 573-589.
    17. Castellani, Davide & Pieri, Fabio, 2013. "R&D offshoring and the productivity growth of European regions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(9), pages 1581-1594.
    18. Harabi, Najib, 1994. "Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz: Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht [Technischer Fortschritt in der Schweiz:Empirische Ergebnisse aus industrieökonomischer Sicht]," MPRA Paper 6725, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Daniel Nepelski & Giuditta de Prato, 2014. "Identifying European Poles of Excellence: The Methodology," JRC Research Reports JRC85356, Joint Research Centre.
    20. Heinz Hollenstein, 2009. "Characteristics of Foreign R&D Strategies of Swiss Firms: Implications for Policy," Chapters, in: Dominique Foray (ed.), The New Economics of Technology Policy, chapter 19, Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:wstudy:24788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Florian Mayr (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/wifooat.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.