IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/wbk/wbpubs/16671.html
   My bibliography  Save this book

Self-evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Group

Author

Listed:
  • Independent Evaluation Group

Abstract

This report presents the self-evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Group (IEG) and covers the period from 2005 to the present. The objectives of the evaluation are as: assess IEG's structure and organizational effectiveness; compare the scope and structure of IEG with other development banks, including resource allocation, staffing, and management; assess the effectiveness of IEG in line with applicable existing best practice in multilateral institution; and develop a set of actions that can be taken in the short term, medium term, and longer term. Overall, IEG's organizational systems, reporting structures, and procedures are consistent with the Evaluation Cooperation Group (ECG) good practice standards for independence. However, independence is a precious asset for effective evaluation and is at the heart of its credibility and impartiality. IEG's work is generally viewed as being of good quality, but areas for improvement emerged from the surveys, in particular in relation to processes and the coverage of approach papers. IEG will focus on increasing the impact of evaluation lessons on the World Bank Group. To be an effective catalyst for change, IEG will engage more actively and upstream with Bank Group management and ensure that its findings and recommendations have greater practical validity and application-and ensure at the same time that its independence is not impaired.

Suggested Citation

  • Independent Evaluation Group, 2011. "Self-evaluation of the Independent Evaluation Group," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16671.
    • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:16671
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/bitstream/handle/10986/16671/812600PUB0IEG000Box379835B00PUBLIC0.pdf?sequence=1
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hendricks, Michael & Handley, Elisabeth A., 1990. "Improving the recommendations from evaluation studies," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 13(2), pages 109-117, January.
    2. Raoul Blindenbacher & Bidjan Nashat, 2010. "The Black Box of Governmental Learning : The Learning Spiral - A Concept to Organize Learning in Governments," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 2474.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. -, 2020. "Building a New Future: Transformative Recovery with Equality and Sustainability," Libros y Documentos Institucionales, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), number 46228 edited by Eclac.
    2. Bidjan Nashat & Sandra Speer & Raoul Blindenbacher, 2013. "Adding Value to Evaluations : Applying the Governmental Learning Spiral for Evaluation-Based Learning," World Bank Publications - Books, The World Bank Group, number 16666.
    3. Blindenbacher, Raoul & Maeschli, Bettina & Bruggmann, Philip, 2019. "The Swiss Hepatitis Strategy as a model for facing future health policy challenges," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(7), pages 681-687.
    4. Stoffregen, Julia Dorothée & Pawlowski, Jan M. & Ras, Eric & Tobias, Eric & Šćepanović, Snezana & Fitzpatrick, Dónal & Mehigan, Tracey & Steffens, Petra & Przygoda, Christiane & Schilling, Peter & Fri, 2016. "Barriers to open e-learning in public administrations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 198-208.
    5. -, 2020. "Building a New Future: Transformative Recovery with Equality and Sustainability," Documentos de posición del período de sesiones de la Comisión 46228, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    6. Brandon, Paul R., 1999. "Involving program stakeholders in reviews of evaluators' recommendations for program revisions," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 363-372, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbpubs:16671. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tal Ayalon (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.